Paper · 2024 · Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science

Elevated CO2 Modulates N Uptake and N Use Efficiency of Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) Response to Soil Progressive Drought at Topping Stage

Lin Zhang; Fulai Liu; Guitong Li

12
claims
26
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Rising atmospheric CO 2 concentration ([CO 2 ]) is believed to mitigate the drought stress on plant, and is regulated by soil nitrogen availability. Nonetheless, effects of elevated [CO 2 ] ( e [CO 2 ]) on plant response to drought and their interactive effects on plant N uptake and utilisation remain critical unknown. In this study, three‐month‐old potted tobacco plants (a C 3 model and crop plant) cultivated at two CO 2 concentrations (400 and 800 μmol mol −1 ) were exposed to progressive drought stress after budding‐topping. In this study, 15 N isotopic technique used for analysing the fertiliser‐N transformation in soil and plant organs. Results shown drought generally decreased tobacco biomass, and soil nutrient supply significantly intensify this leaf biomass decreasing induced by drought, while e [CO 2 ] could alleviate the soil drought and nutrient effects on biomass decreasing in upper‐leaf. During progressive drought, e [CO 2 ]‐plants are able to maintain higher root hydraulic conductivity ( K r ) than their a [CO 2 ]‐counterparts, the higher K r induced by e [CO 2 ] were correlated with leaf stomatal conductance ( g s ) decrease and xylem sap ABA ([ABA] xylem ) increase. In other words, soil nutrient supply enhanced the [ABA] xylem of drought‐stressed plants with 3–7 folds higher than none nutrient supply counterparts. Elevated [CO 2 ] induced more fertiliser‐N accumulated in tobacco leaves, especially under well‐watered conditions, which in turn yielded higher photosynthetic nitrogen use efficiency in leaves but low in whole plant. These results suggested that e [CO 2 ] could alleviate drought‐induced photosynthesis limitation by improving root biomass (mainly fine root) and K r , but the alleviation varied with soil nutrient conditions, thereby mitigating the drought‐negative effects on upper‐leaf growth, finally improved tobacco water use efficiency and tobacco production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought generally decreased tobacco biomass.

Treatment
droughte1
Outcome
biomasse1
Direction
decreasede1
Qualifier
generallye1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–86 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results shown drought generally decreased tobacco biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–716 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil nutrient supply significantly intensified the drought-induced decrease in leaf biomass of tobacco.

Treatment
soil nutrient supplye2
Outcome
leaf biomass decreasinge2
Direction
intensifye2
Qualifier
induced by droughte2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–86 · show in text ↑
e2

“soil nutrient supply significantly intensify this leaf biomass decreasing induced by drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–814 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 could alleviate the soil drought and nutrient effects on tobacco biomass decrease.

Treatment
e [CO 2 ]e3
Outcome
biomass decreasinge3
Direction
alleviatee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–86 · show in text ↑
e3

“while e [CO 2 ] could alleviate the soil drought and nutrient effects on biomass decreasing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–907 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 plants maintained higher root hydraulic conductivity than ambient CO2 plants during progressive drought.

Treatment
e [CO 2 ]e4
Outcome
root hydraulic conductivitye4
Direction
highere4
Qualifier
During progressive droughte4
Comparator
a [CO 2 ]-counterpartse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–86 · show in text ↑
e4

“During progressive drought, e [CO 2 ]-plants are able to maintain higher root hydraulic conductivity (K r) than their a [CO 2 ]-counterparts”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 923–1065 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher root hydraulic conductivity induced by elevated CO2 is correlated with a decrease in leaf stomatal conductance.

Organ / stage
leafe5
Treatment
e [CO 2 ]e5
Outcome
leaf stomatal conductancee5
Direction
decreasee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–86 · show in text ↑
e5

“the higher K r induced by e [CO 2 ] were correlated with leaf stomatal conductance ( g s ) decrease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1067–1166 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher root hydraulic conductivity induced by elevated CO2 is correlated with an increase in xylem sap ABA.

Treatment
e [CO 2 ]e6
Outcome
xylem sap ABAe6
Direction
increasee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–86 · show in text ↑
e6

“the higher K r induced by e [CO 2 ] were correlated with leaf stomatal conductance ( g s ) decrease and xylem sap ABA ([ABA] xylem ) increase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1067–1208 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil nutrient supply enhanced xylem ABA in drought-stressed tobacco plants 3-7 fold relative to plants without nutrient supply.

Treatment
soil nutrient supplye7
Outcome
[ABA] xyleme7
Direction
enhancede7
Value
3–7 foldse7
Comparator
none nutrient supply counterpartse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–86 · show in text ↑
e7

“soil nutrient supply enhanced the [ABA] xylem of drought‐stressed plants with 3–7 folds higher than none nutrient supply counterparts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1359 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 induced more fertiliser-N accumulation in tobacco leaves.

Organ / stage
leavese1
Treatment
Elevated [CO 2]e1
Outcome
accumulated in tobacco leavese1
Direction
moree1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Elevated [CO 2] induced more fertiliser‐N accumulated in tobacco leaves”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1361–1433 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 yielded higher photosynthetic nitrogen use efficiency in leaves.

Organ / stage
leavese2
Treatment
Elevated [CO 2]e1
Outcome
photosynthetic nitrogen use efficiencye2
Direction
highere2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–86 · show in text ↑
e1

“Elevated [CO 2] induced more fertiliser‐N accumulated in tobacco leaves”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1361–1433 · show in text ↑
e2

“which in turn yielded higher photosynthetic nitrogen use efficiency in leaves but low in whole plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1477–1577 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 gave low photosynthetic nitrogen use efficiency in the whole plant.

Organ / stage
whole plante2
Treatment
Elevated [CO 2]e1
Outcome
photosynthetic nitrogen use efficiencye2
Direction
lowe2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–86 · show in text ↑
e1

“Elevated [CO 2] induced more fertiliser‐N accumulated in tobacco leaves”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1361–1433 · show in text ↑
e2

“which in turn yielded higher photosynthetic nitrogen use efficiency in leaves but low in whole plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1477–1577 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 alleviates drought-induced photosynthesis limitation in tobacco by improving root biomass and hydraulic conductivity.

Treatment
e [CO 2]e3
Outcome
photosynthesis limitatione3
Qualifier
by improving root biomass (mainly fine root) and K re3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–86 · show in text ↑
e3

“These results suggested that e [CO 2] could alleviate drought‐induced photosynthesis limitation by improving root biomass (mainly fine root) and K r”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1579–1728 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 improved tobacco water use efficiency and tobacco production under drought.

Treatment
e [CO 2]e3
Outcome
water use efficiency and tobacco productione4
Direction
improvede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–86 · show in text ↑
e3

“These results suggested that e [CO 2] could alleviate drought‐induced photosynthesis limitation by improving root biomass (mainly fine root) and K r”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1579–1728 · show in text ↑
e4

“finally improved tobacco water use efficiency and tobacco production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1859–1927 · show in text ↑

co2 · physiology: water · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

co2 · physiology: photosynthesis · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 10 positive, 6 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

co2 · growth · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 12 positive, 6 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

drought · growth · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 16 positive, 23 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

fertilization · growth · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

182 papers: 154 positive, 28 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 154 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

178 papers more in this group

See all 182 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.