Abstract
An experiment was conducted during February to June in 2022 and 2023 at the College Farm, N. M. College of Agriculture, Navsari Agricultural University, Navsari, India, to evaluate the impact of liquid Nano urea fertilizer on soil properties of soil after harvest of summer rice under South Gujarat conditions. The experiment carried out with a randomized block design (RBD) with twelve nitrogen management treatments combining conventional urea and Nano urea through seedling root dips and foliar sprays. The experimental site had clayey soil, medium organic carbon, and varied nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium levels. Results showed no significant effect of nitrogen treatments on soil pH, electrical conductivity, organic carbon, bulk density, available P2O5 and K2O after harvest of summer rice. However, significantly higher available nitrogen was recorded with 100% RDN (120 kg N/ha) through urea (T1) in both years, but it remained at par with remaining treatments except T2, T3, T5 and T8. The lowest nitrogen was recorded in T12, involving Nano urea without full urea supplementation. The study indicates Nano urea can enhance traditional urea applications but cannot fully replace conventional urea for maintaining soil nitrogen and boosting rice productivity. Integrating Nano urea with conventional methods is essential for sustainable rice cultivation in South Gujarat.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen treatments had no significant effect on soil pH, electrical conductivity or organic carbon after summer rice harvest.
- Taxon
- summer rice
Oryza sativae0 - Treatment
- nitrogen treatmentse0
- Outcome
- soil pH, electrical conductivity, organic carbone0
- Direction
- no significant effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“summer rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
e0“Results showed no significant effect of nitrogen treatments on soil pH, electrical conductivity, organic carbon, bulk density, available P2O5 and K2O after harvest of summer rice”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen treatments had no significant effect on bulk density, available P2O5 or K2O after summer rice harvest.
- Taxon
- summer riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- nitrogen treatmentse0
- Outcome
- bulk density, available P2O5 and K2Oe0
- Direction
- no significant effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“summer rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
e0“Results showed no significant effect of nitrogen treatments on soil pH, electrical conductivity, organic carbon, bulk density, available P2O5 and K2O after harvest of summer rice”
Claim · model-written summary
Available nitrogen was significantly higher with 100% RDN (120 kg N/ha) as urea (T1) in both years.
- Taxon
- summer riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- 100% RDN (120 kg N/ha) through urea (T1)e1
- Outcome
- available nitrogene1
- Direction
- highere1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“summer rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
e1“significantly higher available nitrogen was recorded with 100% RDN (120 kg N/ha) through urea (T1) in both years”
Claim · model-written summary
Available nitrogen with 100% RDN urea (T1) remained at par with the remaining treatments except T2, T3, T5 and T8.
- Taxon
- summer riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- 100% RDN (120 kg N/ha) through urea (T1)e1
- Outcome
- available nitrogene1
- Direction
- at pare2
- Comparator
- remaining treatments except T2, T3, T5 and T8e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“summer rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
e1“significantly higher available nitrogen was recorded with 100% RDN (120 kg N/ha) through urea (T1) in both years”
e2“but it remained at par with remaining treatments except T2, T3, T5 and T8”
Claim · model-written summary
The lowest nitrogen was recorded with nano urea without full urea supplementation (T12).
- Taxon
- summer riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- Nano urea without full urea supplementatione3
- Outcome
- nitrogene3
- Direction
- loweste3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“summer rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
e3“The lowest nitrogen was recorded in T12, involving Nano urea without full urea supplementation”
Claim · model-written summary
Nano urea can enhance traditional urea applications but cannot fully replace conventional urea for maintaining soil nitrogen and boosting rice productivity.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae4
- Outcome
- maintaining soil nitrogen and boosting rice productivitye4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“summer rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
e4“The study indicates Nano urea can enhance traditional urea applications but cannot fully replace conventional urea for maintaining soil nitrogen and boosting rice productivity”
Claim · model-written summary
Integrating nano urea with conventional methods is essential for sustainable rice cultivation in South Gujarat.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae5
- Outcome
- sustainable rice cultivatione5
- Setting
- South Gujarate5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“summer rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
e5“Integrating Nano urea with conventional methods is essential for sustainable rice cultivation in South Gujarat”
The same questions in other papers
nitrogen · soil: physics · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →nitrogen · soil: chemistry · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
41 papers more in this group
See all 45 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.