Abstract
The purpose of research is to study the effectiveness of foliar fertilization when growing grafted grape seedlings on a nursery garden in the conditions of the Rostov Region. The studies were carried out at the production complex and experimental field of ARRIV&W (a branch of FSBSI FRARC) located in Novocherkassk. The study examined the inclusion of foliar application of modern complex fertilizers of the following names: Bio-Don 10 Fe (0.2 %); Beres (0.05 %); Juss Argentum Agro (0.2 %); Helios Boron Molybdenum (0.3 %); Nano Silicon (0.06 %); Fertigrain Foliar (0.2 %) in the technology of growing grafted seedlings of the technical white grape variety Sibirkovy (rootstock Kober 5 BB). The development of the main biometric indicators of the annual growth of the experimental variants using fertilizers increased significantly in comparison with the variant without additional treatments (control) by: 45.0–189.7 cm along the total length of the increase (LSD05=32.84); 23.7-104.7 cm along the length of the hardwood part (LSD05=15.46); 2.7–29.4 % on aging (LSD05= 6.37); 0.2-4.0 mm in diameter (LSD05=0.75); 693.1-5101.5 cm2 of the leaf surface area (LSD05=630.76). The survival rate in the control was 22.4%, and when using fertilizers, it increased to 32.4–51.9 %, which is significant for LSD05 = 1.4. The yield of seedlings in the control was the lowest (19.0%), non-root treatment increased the bottom indicator to 27.5–44.1 %, which is significant at LSD05= 1.31. An increase in the multiplicity of foliar fertilization (Bio-Don 10 Fe; Beres; Helios Boron Molybdenum; Nano Silicon; Fertigrain Foliar) from 2 to 4 times increased the survival rate by 1.4–14.8 %, and the yield of seedlings by 1.2–12.5 %. Correlation analysis showed positive linear dependencies: 1 – increase in the diameter of the increment with an increase in the multiplicity of processing (r=0.589); 2 – increase in survival rate and yield of seedlings with an increase in the frequency of processing (r = 0.659).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar fertilizers increased the total length of the annual increment of grafted grape seedlings by 45.0–189.7 cm compared with the control.
Verbatim
e0“the effectiveness of foliar fertilization when growing grafted grape seedlings on a nursery garden in the conditions of the Rostov Region”
e1“The study examined the inclusion of foliar application of modern complex fertilizers”
e2“increased significantly in comparison with the variant without additional treatments (control) by: 45.0–189.7 cm along the total length of the increase (LSD05=32.84)”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilizer use raised the survival rate of grafted grape seedlings from 22.4% in the control to 32.4–51.9 %.
Verbatim
e0“the effectiveness of foliar fertilization when growing grafted grape seedlings on a nursery garden in the conditions of the Rostov Region”
e7“The survival rate in the control was 22.4%, and when using fertilizers, it increased to 32.4–51.9 %, which is significant for LSD05 = 1.4”
Claim · model-written summary
Non-root foliar treatment raised the yield of grafted grape seedlings from 19.0% in the control to 27.5–44.1 %.
Verbatim
e0“the effectiveness of foliar fertilization when growing grafted grape seedlings on a nursery garden in the conditions of the Rostov Region”
e7“The yield of seedlings in the control was the lowest (19.0%), non-root treatment increased the bottom indicator to 27.5–44.1 %, which is significant at LSD05= 1.31”
Claim · model-written summary
Raising the foliar fertilization frequency from 2 to 4 times increased the survival rate of grafted grape seedlings by 1.4–14.8 %.
- Taxon
- grafted grape seedlingse0
- Treatment
- increase in the multiplicity of foliar fertilizatione7
- Outcome
- survival ratee7
- Direction
- increasede7
- Value
- 1.4–14.8 %e7
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“the effectiveness of foliar fertilization when growing grafted grape seedlings on a nursery garden in the conditions of the Rostov Region”
e7“An increase in the multiplicity of foliar fertilization (Bio-Don 10 Fe; Beres; Helios Boron Molybdenum; Nano Silicon; Fertigrain Foliar) from 2 to 4 times increased the survival rate by 1.4–14.8 %, and the yield of seedlings by 1.2–12.5 %”
Claim · model-written summary
Raising the foliar fertilization frequency from 2 to 4 times increased the yield of grafted grape seedlings by 1.2–12.5 %.
- Taxon
- grafted grape seedlingse0
- Treatment
- increase in the multiplicity of foliar fertilizatione7
- Outcome
- yield of seedlingse7
- Direction
- increasede7
- Value
- 1.2–12.5 %e7
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“the effectiveness of foliar fertilization when growing grafted grape seedlings on a nursery garden in the conditions of the Rostov Region”
e7“An increase in the multiplicity of foliar fertilization (Bio-Don 10 Fe; Beres; Helios Boron Molybdenum; Nano Silicon; Fertigrain Foliar) from 2 to 4 times increased the survival rate by 1.4–14.8 %, and the yield of seedlings by 1.2–12.5 %”
Claim · model-written summary
The diameter of the increment of grafted grape seedlings was positively correlated with the multiplicity of processing (r=0.589).
Verbatim
e0“the effectiveness of foliar fertilization when growing grafted grape seedlings on a nursery garden in the conditions of the Rostov Region”
e7“increase in the diameter of the increment with an increase in the multiplicity of processing (r=0.589)”
Claim · model-written summary
Survival rate and seedling yield of grafted grape seedlings were positively correlated with the frequency of processing (r = 0.659).
Verbatim
e0“the effectiveness of foliar fertilization when growing grafted grape seedlings on a nursery garden in the conditions of the Rostov Region”
e7“increase in survival rate and yield of seedlings with an increase in the frequency of processing (r = 0.659)”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · yield · VitisResults differ
96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
103 papers more in this group
See all 107 papers →application · yield · VitisPositive and negative results
79 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
83 papers more in this group
See all 87 papers →application · survival · VitisResults agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
fertilization · survival · VitisResults agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.