Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Raising the foliar fertilization frequency from 2 to 4 times increased the yield of grafted grape seedlings by 1.2–12.5 %.

A claim from THE EFFECTIVENESS OF FOLIAR APPLICATION OF POLYNUTRIENT FERTILIZERS ON THE NURSERY GARDEN FOR GROWING GRAFTED GRAPE SEEDLINGS · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raising the foliar fertilization frequency from 2 to 4 times increased the yield of grafted grape seedlings by 1.2–12.5 %.

Taxon
grafted grape seedlingse0
Treatment
increase in the multiplicity of foliar fertilizatione7
Outcome
yield of seedlingse7
Direction
increasede7
Value
1.2–12.5 %e7

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“the effectiveness of foliar fertilization when growing grafted grape seedlings on a nursery garden in the conditions of the Rostov Region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–173
e7

“An increase in the multiplicity of foliar fertilization (Bio-Don 10 Fe; Beres; Helios Boron Molybdenum; Nano Silicon; Fertigrain Foliar) from 2 to 4 times increased the survival rate by 1.4–14.8 %, and the yield of seedlings by 1.2–12.5 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1477–1715

Title

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF FOLIAR APPLICATION OF POLYNUTRIENT FERTILIZERS ON THE NURSERY GARDEN FOR GROWING GRAFTED GRAPE SEEDLINGS

Irina Avdeenko Bulletin of KSAU 2025. doi:10.36718/1819-4036-2023-8-32-38

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-6d0277fc79d2345fdb64ab3140004207cccd6cfb890f5c16dd946aec8c14e244 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

fertilization · yield · VitisResults differ

107 papers: 97 positive, 10 negative or no effect

96 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

98 papers more in this group

See all 107 papers →

application · yield · VitisPositive and negative results

87 papers: 80 positive, 7 negative or no effect

79 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. positive

78 papers more in this group

See all 87 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.