Paper · 2025 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Effects of irrigation and organic fertilizer on pumpkin yield, quality, and water-fertilizer use efficiency in arid northwest China

Meng Yin; Jinxia Zhang; Liangliang Du; et al.

19
claims
40
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Due to the increasing water scarcity and the need for sustainable agricultural practices in arid regions, optimizing water and fertilizer management is crucial for enhancing crop productivity and resource efficiency. Field experiments in 2022 and 2023 in northwestern China’s arid region explored the impacts of irrigation volume, organic fertilizer use, and their coupling on pumpkin yield, quality, and water-fertilizer efficiency. The study included ten treatments with a completely randomized two-factor design, comprising three irrigation quotas, three organic fertilizer application rates and a control group (CK). The results showed that the organic fertilizer application significantly enhanced soil moisture content, which peaked at a depth of 50 cm. Irrigation quota and organic fertilizer application had a highly significant impact on pumpkin vine length and stem diameter (P < 0.01), with a significant interaction between the two factors (P < 0.05). The rate of dry matter accumulation in pumpkin peaked at 60 ~ 80 days after sowing, with a trend of F2 > F3 > F1 in dry matter accumulation at identical irrigation quota. The effects of irrigation volume, organic fertilizer application and water-fertilizer coupling on pumpkin yield, irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE), partial fertilizer productivity (PFP) and pumpkin quality were statistically highly significant (P < 0.01). Specifically, increasing the irrigation volume from W1 to W3 increased the yield by 17.36%. However, pumpkin yield initially increased and then decreased in response to increasing organic fertilizer application. IWUE increased and then decreased with the increase of organic fertilizer application, while PFP increased with the increase of irrigation volume. Regression analysis revealed that the optimal range for irrigation quota to ensure pumpkin quality was 430 ~ 506 m 3 ·ha -1 , and that for organic fertilizer application was 5,373 ~ 6,570 kg·ha -1 . When only quality indicators were considered, the W2F2 treatment performed well. However, from the comprehensive evaluation of pumpkin yield, quality, and water and fertilizer use efficiency using the TOPSIS method, the W3F2 treatment was identified as the most suitable among the water- fertilizer coupling management modes considered in this study for pumpkin cultivation in the arid northwestern China.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizer application significantly enhanced soil moisture content, which peaked at a depth of 50 cm.

Taxon
pumpkint0
Treatment
organic fertilizer applicatione1
Outcome
soil moisture contente1
Direction
enhancede1
Qualifier
peaked at a depth of 50 cme1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“pumpkin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–55 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results showed that the organic fertilizer application significantly enhanced soil moisture content, which peaked at a depth of 50 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–758 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation quota and organic fertilizer application had a highly significant impact on pumpkin vine length and stem diameter (P < 0.01).

Taxon
pumpkint0
Treatment
Irrigation quota and organic fertilizer applicatione2
Outcome
pumpkin vine length and stem diametere2
Qualifier
P < 0.01e2

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“pumpkin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–55 · show in text ↑
e2

“Irrigation quota and organic fertilizer application had a highly significant impact on pumpkin vine length and stem diameter (P < 0.01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–895 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction between irrigation quota and organic fertilizer application significantly affected pumpkin vine length and stem diameter (P < 0.05).

Taxon
pumpkint0
Treatment
Irrigation quota and organic fertilizer applicatione2
Outcome
pumpkin vine length and stem diametere2
Qualifier
significant interaction between the two factors (P < 0.05)e3

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“pumpkin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–55 · show in text ↑
e2

“Irrigation quota and organic fertilizer application had a highly significant impact on pumpkin vine length and stem diameter (P < 0.01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–895 · show in text ↑
e3

“with a significant interaction between the two factors (P < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–962 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The rate of dry matter accumulation in pumpkin peaked at 60 to 80 days after sowing.

Taxon
pumpkint0
Outcome
rate of dry matter accumulatione4
Value
60 ~ 80 days after sowinge4

Verbatim

t0

“pumpkin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–55 · show in text ↑
e4

“The rate of dry matter accumulation in pumpkin peaked at 60 ~ 80 days after sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1046 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter accumulation followed the trend F2 > F3 > F1 at identical irrigation quota.

Taxon
pumpkint0
Outcome
dry matter accumulatione5
Value
F2 > F3 > F1e5
Qualifier
at identical irrigation quotae5

Verbatim

t0

“pumpkin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–55 · show in text ↑
e5

“with a trend of F2 > F3 > F1 in dry matter accumulation at identical irrigation quota”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1133 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation volume had highly significant (P < 0.01) effects on pumpkin yield, IWUE and PFP.

Taxon
pumpkint0
Treatment
irrigation volumee6
Outcome
pumpkin yield, irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE), partial fertilizer productivity (PFP)e6
Qualifier
P < 0.01e6

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“pumpkin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–55 · show in text ↑
e6

“The effects of irrigation volume, organic fertilizer application and water-fertilizer coupling on pumpkin yield, irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE), partial fertilizer productivity (PFP) and pumpkin quality were statistically highly significant (P < 0.01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1394 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation volume had highly significant (P < 0.01) effects on pumpkin quality.

Taxon
pumpkint0
Treatment
irrigation volumee6
Outcome
pumpkin qualitye6
Qualifier
P < 0.01e6

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“pumpkin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–55 · show in text ↑
e6

“The effects of irrigation volume, organic fertilizer application and water-fertilizer coupling on pumpkin yield, irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE), partial fertilizer productivity (PFP) and pumpkin quality were statistically highly significant (P < 0.01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1394 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizer application had highly significant (P < 0.01) effects on pumpkin yield, IWUE and PFP.

Taxon
pumpkint0
Treatment
organic fertilizer applicatione6
Outcome
pumpkin yield, irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE), partial fertilizer productivity (PFP)e6
Qualifier
P < 0.01e6

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“pumpkin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–55 · show in text ↑
e6

“The effects of irrigation volume, organic fertilizer application and water-fertilizer coupling on pumpkin yield, irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE), partial fertilizer productivity (PFP) and pumpkin quality were statistically highly significant (P < 0.01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1394 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizer application had highly significant (P < 0.01) effects on pumpkin quality.

Taxon
pumpkint0
Treatment
organic fertilizer applicatione6
Outcome
pumpkin qualitye6
Qualifier
P < 0.01e6

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“pumpkin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–55 · show in text ↑
e6

“The effects of irrigation volume, organic fertilizer application and water-fertilizer coupling on pumpkin yield, irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE), partial fertilizer productivity (PFP) and pumpkin quality were statistically highly significant (P < 0.01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1394 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water-fertilizer coupling had highly significant (P < 0.01) effects on pumpkin yield, IWUE and PFP.

Taxon
pumpkint0
Treatment
water-fertilizer couplinge6
Outcome
pumpkin yield, irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE), partial fertilizer productivity (PFP)e6
Qualifier
P < 0.01e6

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“pumpkin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–55 · show in text ↑
e6

“The effects of irrigation volume, organic fertilizer application and water-fertilizer coupling on pumpkin yield, irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE), partial fertilizer productivity (PFP) and pumpkin quality were statistically highly significant (P < 0.01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1394 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water-fertilizer coupling had highly significant (P < 0.01) effects on pumpkin quality.

Taxon
pumpkint0
Treatment
water-fertilizer couplinge6
Outcome
pumpkin qualitye6
Qualifier
P < 0.01e6

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“pumpkin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–55 · show in text ↑
e6

“The effects of irrigation volume, organic fertilizer application and water-fertilizer coupling on pumpkin yield, irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE), partial fertilizer productivity (PFP) and pumpkin quality were statistically highly significant (P < 0.01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1394 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing irrigation volume from W1 to W3 increased pumpkin yield by 17.36%.

Taxon
pumpkint0
Treatment
increasing the irrigation volume from W1 to W3e7
Outcome
yielde7
Direction
increasede7
Value
17.36%e7
Comparator
W1e7

Verbatim

t0

“pumpkin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–55 · show in text ↑
e7

“increasing the irrigation volume from W1 to W3 increased the yield by 17.36%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1410–1486 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pumpkin yield first increased and then decreased with increasing organic fertilizer application.

Taxon
pumpkint0
Treatment
increasing organic fertilizer applicatione1
Outcome
pumpkin yielde1
Direction
initially increased and then decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“pumpkin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–55 · show in text ↑
e1

“pumpkin yield initially increased and then decreased in response to increasing organic fertilizer application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1497–1606 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IWUE first increased and then decreased with increasing organic fertilizer application.

Taxon
pumpkint0
Treatment
the increase of organic fertilizer applicatione2
Outcome
IWUEe2
Direction
increased and then decreasede2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“pumpkin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–55 · show in text ↑
e2

“IWUE increased and then decreased with the increase of organic fertilizer application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1608–1693 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PFP increased with increasing irrigation volume.

Taxon
pumpkint0
Treatment
the increase of irrigation volumee3
Outcome
PFPe3
Direction
increasede3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“pumpkin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–55 · show in text ↑
e3

“PFP increased with the increase of irrigation volume”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1701–1753 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The optimal irrigation quota range for pumpkin quality was 430 to 506 m3 per ha.

Taxon
pumpkint0
Outcome
optimal range for irrigation quota to ensure pumpkin qualitye1
Value
430 ~ 506 m 3 ·ha -1e1

Verbatim

t0

“pumpkin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–55 · show in text ↑
e1

“Regression analysis revealed that the optimal range for irrigation quota to ensure pumpkin quality was 430 ~ 506 m 3 ·ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1755–1878 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The optimal organic fertilizer application for pumpkin was 5,373 to 6,570 kg per ha.

Taxon
pumpkint0
Outcome
organic fertilizer applicatione1
Value
5,373 ~ 6,570 kg·ha -1e1

Verbatim

t0

“pumpkin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–55 · show in text ↑
e1

“for organic fertilizer application was 5,373 ~ 6,570 kg·ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1890–1951 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

When only quality indicators were considered, the W2F2 treatment performed well.

Taxon
pumpkint0
Treatment
the W2F2 treatmente1
Outcome
quality indicatorse1
Qualifier
When only quality indicators were considerede1

Verbatim

t0

“pumpkin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–55 · show in text ↑
e1

“When only quality indicators were considered, the W2F2 treatment performed well”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1954–2033 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Across the water-fertilizer coupling modes, the W3F2 treatment was the most suitable for pumpkin cultivation in arid northwest China.

Taxon
pumpkint0
Treatment
the W3F2 treatmente1
Outcome
most suitablee1
Qualifier
TOPSIS methode2

Verbatim

t0

“pumpkin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–55 · show in text ↑
e1

“the W3F2 treatment was identified as the most suitable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2170–2224 · show in text ↑
e2

“from the comprehensive evaluation of pumpkin yield, quality, and water and fertilizer use efficiency using the TOPSIS method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2044–2168 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 17 positive, 4 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

fertilization · quality: grain · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.