Paper · 2025 · Plants

Biopriming of Cucumis sativus L. Seeds with a Consortium of Nitrofixing Cyanobacteria Treated with Static Magnetic Field

Yadenis Ortega Díaz; Liliana Gómez Luna; Yilan Fung Boix; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The growing demand for sustainable agriculture necessitates innovative strategies to enhance crop productivity while minimizing environmental impact. This study explores the biopriming potential of Cucumis sativus L. seeds using extracts derived from a consortium of nitrofixing cyanobacteria Nostoc commune, Calothrix sp., and Aphanothece minutissima subjected to static magnetic field (SMF) treatments. The cyanobacterial consortia were exposed to SMF at varying magnetic inductions (40–50 mT and 100–200 mT), followed by extract preparation and application as biopriming agents. Results demonstrated significant improvements in key seedling growth parameters, including root and stem length, vigor index I, and fresh biomass. The consortium treated with 40–50 mT SMF showed the most pronounced growth-stimulating activity, suggesting enhanced bioactive compound production under this treatment that might be related to auxin biosynthesis. Biopriming with cyanobacterial extracts maintained a balanced nutritional uptake and plant health, as indicated by stable fresh weight dry weight ratios. These findings highlight the potential of SMF-enhanced cyanobacterial consortia as biopriming agents for horticultural crops. Future research should elucidate the underlying modes of action and optimize conditions for broader crop applications.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biopriming with cyanobacterial extracts improved root and stem length and vigor index I of cucumber seedlings.

Taxon
Cucumis sativus L.Cucumis sativuse2
Treatment
extracts derived from a consortium of nitrofixing cyanobacteriae2
Outcome
root and stem length, vigor index Ie1
Direction
improvementse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Results demonstrated significant improvements in key seedling growth parameters, including root and stem length, vigor index I, and fresh biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–727 · show in text ↑
e2

“biopriming potential of Cucumis sativus L. seeds using extracts derived from a consortium of nitrofixing cyanobacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–292 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biopriming with cyanobacterial extracts improved fresh biomass of cucumber seedlings.

Taxon
Cucumis sativus L.Cucumis sativuse2
Treatment
extracts derived from a consortium of nitrofixing cyanobacteriae2
Outcome
fresh biomasse1
Direction
improvementse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Results demonstrated significant improvements in key seedling growth parameters, including root and stem length, vigor index I, and fresh biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–727 · show in text ↑
e2

“biopriming potential of Cucumis sativus L. seeds using extracts derived from a consortium of nitrofixing cyanobacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–292 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cyanobacteria consortium treated with 40–50 mT static magnetic field gave the most pronounced growth-stimulating activity in cucumber.

Taxon
Cucumis sativus L.Cucumis sativuse2
Treatment
40–50 mT SMFe1
Outcome
growth-stimulating activitye1
Direction
most pronouncede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The consortium treated with 40–50 mT SMF showed the most pronounced growth-stimulating activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–824 · show in text ↑
e2

“biopriming potential of Cucumis sativus L. seeds using extracts derived from a consortium of nitrofixing cyanobacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–292 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Enhanced bioactive compound production under the 40–50 mT treatment may be related to auxin biosynthesis.

Taxon
Cucumis sativus L.Cucumis sativuse2
Compound
auxine1
Outcome
bioactive compound productione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“suggesting enhanced bioactive compound production under this treatment that might be related to auxin biosynthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–940 · show in text ↑
e2

“biopriming potential of Cucumis sativus L. seeds using extracts derived from a consortium of nitrofixing cyanobacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–292 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biopriming with cyanobacterial extracts maintained balanced nutritional uptake and plant health in cucumber.

Taxon
Cucumis sativus L.Cucumis sativuse2
Treatment
Biopriming with cyanobacterial extractse1
Outcome
balanced nutritional uptake and plant healthe1
Direction
maintainede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Biopriming with cyanobacterial extracts maintained a balanced nutritional uptake and plant health, as indicated by stable fresh weight dry weight ratios”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1094 · show in text ↑
e2

“biopriming potential of Cucumis sativus L. seeds using extracts derived from a consortium of nitrofixing cyanobacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–292 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fresh weight to dry weight ratios of biopriming-treated cucumber seedlings were stable.

Taxon
Cucumis sativus L.Cucumis sativuse2
Outcome
fresh weight dry weight ratiose1
Qualifier
stablee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Biopriming with cyanobacterial extracts maintained a balanced nutritional uptake and plant health, as indicated by stable fresh weight dry weight ratios”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1094 · show in text ↑
e2

“biopriming potential of Cucumis sativus L. seeds using extracts derived from a consortium of nitrofixing cyanobacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–292 · show in text ↑

magnetic · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

botanical · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

111 papers: 66 positive, 45 negative or no effect

65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

107 papers more in this group

See all 111 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.