Paper · 2025 · Plant Science Today

Synergistic impact of zinc, iron, and nitrogen on nutrient availability and soil health for sustainable mustard (Brassica juncea L.) cultivation

L Diana; J Anita; H S Sarang

7
claims
17
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The rising incidence of chronic diseases, such as cancer, osteoporosis, and cardiovascular disorders, is associated with micronutrient deficiencies. Significant shortages in iron, folate, zinc, iodine, and vitamin A lead to several health complications, highlighting the necessity for comprehensive preventive measures. Agronomic biofortification, especially by delivering micronutrients via foliar spraying, offers a viable method to improve crop nutritional value and alleviate malnutrition. This research investigated Brassica juncea L. (Indian mustard), an important oilseed crop in India, analyzing the impact of several fertilization treatments on soil and plant nutrient dynamics at Lovely Professional University during the winter season of 2022-2023. The field trial used a randomized block design with eight treatments, including control and combinations of urea, FeSO?, and ZnSO?. Soil tests indicated that foliar sprays enhanced nutrient availability, especially nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium, iron, and zinc, improving soil health and crop nutrient absorption. The findings demonstrated that integrating urea with micronutrient sprays optimized plant nutrient concentration and absorption in Brassica juncea, enhancing crop performance. Maximum soil pH, EC, organic carbon, and nutrient availability (N, P, K, S, Fe, Zn) were observed with RDF combined with 1 % urea, 0.5 % ZnSO?·7H?O, and 0.5 % FeSO?·7H?O foliar sprays at 45 DAS. Nutrient uptake and biofortification efficiency indices were significantly enhanced under these treatments, promoting plant growth and productivity. The control group showed the lowest values across all parameters. The results highlight the promise of agronomic biofortification in mitigating micronutrient deficits and enhancing food security, especially in areas dependent on staple crops for sustenance. This study promotes incorporating micronutrient management measures in agricultural practices to improve sustainable development and public health outcomes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar sprays enhanced soil nutrient availability, especially N, P, K, Fe and Zn.

Taxon
Brassica juncea L.Brassica junceae0
Treatment
foliar sprayse1
Outcome
nutrient availabilitye1
Direction
enhancede1
Qualifier
especially nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium, iron, and zince1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This research investigated Brassica juncea L. (Indian mustard)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–556 · show in text ↑
e1

“Soil tests indicated that foliar sprays enhanced nutrient availability, especially nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium, iron, and zinc, improving soil health and crop nutrient absorption”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1075 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrating urea with micronutrient sprays optimized plant nutrient concentration and absorption in mustard.

Taxon
Brassica junceaBrassica junceae2
Treatment
integrating urea with micronutrient sprayse2
Outcome
plant nutrient concentration and absorptione2
Direction
optimizede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This research investigated Brassica juncea L. (Indian mustard)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–556 · show in text ↑
e2

“The findings demonstrated that integrating urea with micronutrient sprays optimized plant nutrient concentration and absorption in Brassica juncea, enhancing crop performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1251 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF with 1 % urea and foliar sprays gave maximum soil pH, EC and organic carbon at 45 DAS.

Taxon
Brassica juncea L.Brassica junceae0
Treatment
RDF combined with 1 % ureae3
Outcome
soil pH, EC, organic carbone3
Direction
Maximume3
Qualifier
at 45 DASe3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This research investigated Brassica juncea L. (Indian mustard)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–556 · show in text ↑
e3

“Maximum soil pH, EC, organic carbon, and nutrient availability (N, P, K, S, Fe, Zn) were observed with RDF combined with 1 % urea, 0.5 % ZnSO?·7H?O, and 0.5 % FeSO?·7H?O foliar sprays at 45 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1446 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF with 1 % urea and foliar sprays gave maximum nutrient availability (N, P, K, S, Fe, Zn) at 45 DAS.

Taxon
Brassica juncea L.Brassica junceae0
Treatment
RDF combined with 1 % ureae3
Outcome
nutrient availability (N, P, K, S, Fe, Zn)e3
Direction
Maximume3
Qualifier
at 45 DASe3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This research investigated Brassica juncea L. (Indian mustard)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–556 · show in text ↑
e3

“Maximum soil pH, EC, organic carbon, and nutrient availability (N, P, K, S, Fe, Zn) were observed with RDF combined with 1 % urea, 0.5 % ZnSO?·7H?O, and 0.5 % FeSO?·7H?O foliar sprays at 45 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1446 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient uptake and biofortification efficiency indices were significantly enhanced under the RDF with urea and micronutrient sprays, relative to the control.

Taxon
Brassica juncea L.Brassica junceae0
Treatment
RDF combined with 1 % ureae3
Outcome
Nutrient uptake and biofortification efficiency indicese4
Direction
enhancede4
Comparator
control groupe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This research investigated Brassica juncea L. (Indian mustard)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–556 · show in text ↑
e3

“Maximum soil pH, EC, organic carbon, and nutrient availability (N, P, K, S, Fe, Zn) were observed with RDF combined with 1 % urea, 0.5 % ZnSO?·7H?O, and 0.5 % FeSO?·7H?O foliar sprays at 45 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1446 · show in text ↑
e4

“Nutrient uptake and biofortification efficiency indices were significantly enhanced under these treatments, promoting plant growth and productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1448–1595 · show in text ↑
e5

“The control group showed the lowest values across all parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1597–1661 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF with 1 % urea and foliar sprays promoted plant growth and productivity of mustard.

Taxon
Brassica juncea L.Brassica junceae0
Treatment
RDF combined with 1 % ureae3
Outcome
plant growth and productivitye4
Direction
promotinge4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This research investigated Brassica juncea L. (Indian mustard)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–556 · show in text ↑
e3

“Maximum soil pH, EC, organic carbon, and nutrient availability (N, P, K, S, Fe, Zn) were observed with RDF combined with 1 % urea, 0.5 % ZnSO?·7H?O, and 0.5 % FeSO?·7H?O foliar sprays at 45 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1446 · show in text ↑
e4

“Nutrient uptake and biofortification efficiency indices were significantly enhanced under these treatments, promoting plant growth and productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1448–1595 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The control group had the lowest values across all measured parameters.

Taxon
Brassica juncea L.Brassica junceae0
Outcome
values across all parameterse5
Direction
loweste5
Comparator
control groupe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This research investigated Brassica juncea L. (Indian mustard)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–556 · show in text ↑
e5

“The control group showed the lowest values across all parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1597–1661 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results differ

65 papers: 63 positive, 2 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Positive and negative results

42 papers: 41 positive, 1 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

fertilization · yield · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Positive and negative results

139 papers: 138 positive, 1 negative or no effect

137 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

135 papers more in this group

See all 139 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.