Intervention effectmodel-written summary

T6 significantly increased availability of macronutrients (N, P, K) in post-harvest mustard soil over control.

A claim from Impact of Foliar Application of Nano Nitrogen and Nano Zinc on Soil Properties of Mustard (Brassica juncea L.) Crop · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 significantly increased availability of macronutrients (N, P, K) in post-harvest mustard soil over control.

Taxon
Mustard (Brassica juncea L.)Brassica junceat0
Treatment
T6 (100% NPK Zn +1st spray of Nano N and Zn at 30 DAS +2nd spray of Nano N and Zn at 45 DAS)e0
Outcome
availability of macronutrients (N, P, K)e0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Mustard (Brassica juncea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–110
e0

“The application treatment T6 (100% NPK Zn +1st spray of Nano N and Zn at 30 DAS +2nd spray of Nano N and Zn at 45 DAS) has significantly increased the availability of macronutrients (N, P, K), micronutrients (Zn, Fe, Cu and Mn), microbial population (bacteria, fungi and actinomycetes) as well as the dehydrogenase and acid phosphatase enzyme activity in post-harvest soil of mustard over control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–1140

Title

Impact of Foliar Application of Nano Nitrogen and Nano Zinc on Soil Properties of Mustard (Brassica juncea L.) Crop

Kriti Sharma; R. H. Meena; Kishan Kumar; et al. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science 2023. doi:10.9734/ijpss/2023/v35i183399

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-e39820560d77b3354364f6a3fae9642c75ff8b6c44797b1910a98cb48583ac92 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Positive and negative results

42 papers: 41 positive, 1 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

33 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

nanoparticle · nutrient: content · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.