Paper · 2025 · Scientific Reports

Supplementation of silicon oxide nanoparticles mitigates the damaging effects of arsenic stress on photosynthesis, antioxidant mechanism and nitrogen metabolism in Brassica juncea

Mohammad Faisal; Aynur Bilmez Ozcinar; Erdal Karadeniz; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
14
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Nanoparticles (NPs) represent one of the most promising platforms for addressing challenges in drug delivery, biosensing, and the development of advanced biotechnological tools. These innovative materials are revolutionizing modern agriculture by enabling precision farming practices that optimize resource utilization and enhance crop productivity. This study investigates the role of silicon oxide nanoparticles (SiO 2 NPs, 200 ppm) in mitigating arsenic (As, 50 µM) toxicity in Brassica juncea . The results demonstrate that As stress significantly impaired morphological and physiological parameters, as well as the accumulation of key metabolites, including flavonoids, phenolics, proteins, soluble sugars, and free amino acids. However, foliar application of SiO 2 NPs effectively alleviated As-induced toxicity by enhancing antioxidant enzyme activities and maintaining nutrient homeostasis. The application of SiO 2 NPs also positively influenced growth parameters, net photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, and soluble sugar content. Notably, SiO 2 NPs improved the transpiration rate by 52%, leaf nitrogen content by 33%, and phenolic content by 42%. Furthermore, there was a significant reduction in oxidative stress markers, with hydrogen peroxide and malondialdehyde levels decreasing by 41% and 39%, respectively, indicating reduced oxidative damage and lipid peroxidation. These findings underscore the promising potential of SiO 2 NPs in mitigating As stress and offer valuable insights for promoting sustainable crop production under environmental stress conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

As stress significantly impaired morphological and physiological parameters, as well as the accumulation of key metabolites, including flavonoids, phenolics, proteins, soluble sugars, and free amino acids

Taxon
Brassica junceaBrassica junceat0
Treatment
As stresse0
Outcome
morphological and physiological parameterse0
Direction
impairede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As stress significantly impaired morphological and physiological parameters, as well as the accumulation of key metabolites, including flavonoids, phenolics, proteins, soluble sugars, and free amino acids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–732 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica juncea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 164–179 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

foliar application of SiO 2 NPs effectively alleviated As-induced toxicity by enhancing antioxidant enzyme activities and maintaining nutrient homeostasis

Taxon
Brassica junceaBrassica junceat0
Treatment
foliar application of SiO 2 NPse0
Outcome
antioxidant enzyme activitiese0
Direction
enhancinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of SiO 2 NPs effectively alleviated As-induced toxicity by enhancing antioxidant enzyme activities and maintaining nutrient homeostasis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–897 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica juncea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 164–179 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The application of SiO 2 NPs also positively influenced growth parameters, net photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, and soluble sugar content

Taxon
Brassica junceaBrassica junceat0
Treatment
SiO 2 NPse0
Outcome
growth parameters, net photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, and soluble sugar contente0
Direction
positively influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of SiO 2 NPs also positively influenced growth parameters, net photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, and soluble sugar content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1046 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica juncea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 164–179 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SiO 2 NPs improved the transpiration rate by 52%, leaf nitrogen content by 33%, and phenolic content by 42%

Taxon
Brassica junceaBrassica junceat0
Treatment
SiO 2 NPse0
Outcome
transpiration ratee0
Direction
improvede0
Value
52%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SiO 2 NPs improved the transpiration rate by 52%, leaf nitrogen content by 33%, and phenolic content by 42%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1164 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica juncea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 164–179 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SiO 2 NPs improved the transpiration rate by 52%, leaf nitrogen content by 33%, and phenolic content by 42%

Taxon
Brassica junceaBrassica junceat0
Treatment
SiO 2 NPse0
Outcome
leaf nitrogen contente0
Direction
improvede0
Value
33%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SiO 2 NPs improved the transpiration rate by 52%, leaf nitrogen content by 33%, and phenolic content by 42%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1164 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica juncea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 164–179 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SiO 2 NPs improved the transpiration rate by 52%, leaf nitrogen content by 33%, and phenolic content by 42%

Taxon
Brassica junceaBrassica junceat0
Treatment
SiO 2 NPse0
Outcome
phenolic contente0
Direction
improvede0
Value
42%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SiO 2 NPs improved the transpiration rate by 52%, leaf nitrogen content by 33%, and phenolic content by 42%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1164 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica juncea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 164–179 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

hydrogen peroxide and malondialdehyde levels decreasing by 41% and 39%, respectively

Taxon
Brassica junceaBrassica junceat0
Outcome
hydrogen peroxidee0
Direction
decreasinge0
Value
41%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hydrogen peroxide and malondialdehyde levels decreasing by 41% and 39%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1331 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica juncea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 164–179 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

hydrogen peroxide and malondialdehyde levels decreasing by 41% and 39%, respectively

Taxon
Brassica junceaBrassica junceat0
Outcome
malondialdehyde levelse0
Direction
decreasinge0
Value
39%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hydrogen peroxide and malondialdehyde levels decreasing by 41% and 39%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1331 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica juncea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 164–179 · show in text ↑

nanoparticle · physiology: photosynthesis · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nanoparticle · soil: biology · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · soil: biology · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

nanoparticle · nutrient: content · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.