Paper · 2025 · Visnyk agrarnoi nauky

Exit of starch and bioethanol from corn crops depending on predecessors and basic tillage

A. Andriienko; I. Semeniaka; O. Andriienko

17
claims
33
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Goal. To develop the basic parameters of bioadaptive technology of corn cultivation (ZEA Mays L.), and to determine the yield and quality of grain in the Steppe of Ukraine. Methods. The main — field experiment, additional — laboratory, calculation, and mathematical statistics (variance and correlation analyses). Results. The research was conducted in the conditions of the Northern Steppe of Ukraine during 2010–2024. The use of soybeans as a predecessor had a positive effect on corn grain yield (6.56–7.15 t/ha), which was much higher than after other predecessors. The lowest yield for plowing was after sunflower — 6.29 t/ha. The minimization of soil tillage after all predecessors led to a reliable harvest, which was 0.59–2.55 t/ha for direct sowing. At the same time, the harvest of corn grain for direct sowing after soybean was higher than for plowing after sunflower. Starch content in corn grain had an inverse dependence on yield (r = –0.74) and was larger than for sowing after sunflower (71.67–72.33%), and the smallest — after soybean (70.63–71.47% ). The starch content in the grain was affected by the depth of soil cultivation and had an inverse correlation (r = –0.59). With the minimization of the basic tillage, there was a general tendency to reduce the biometric indicators of the cobs, the amount of grains, and the weight of grain with 1 cob. The inverse relationship between the indicators of the crop structure and the starch content in corn grain was established (r = –0,51…–0.73). With shallow tillage, the content of starch in grain was less than in variants without soil tillage by 0.06–0.67%, and with deep plowing — by 0.57–0.97%. At the same time, it was during deep plowing that the highest yield of starch and bio-ethanol was obtained from a unit area as a complex estimated indicator of crop productivity — 4,51–5.05 t/ha and 288.2–322.7 dal/ha (2.92–3,27 thousand l/ha) respectively. For shallow soil tillage, these figures were less by 4.1–6.8%, for direct sowing — by 7.1–37.4%. The output of starch and bio-ethanol for corn sowing after soybean was higher than for plowing after sunflower and in repeated crops. Conclusions. To form a stable productivity of crops and high yield of starch and bioethanol in the conditions of the Northern Steppe, corn for grain should be grown after the best predecessors against the background of plowing as the main cultivation of ordinary black soil. Minimizing soil tillage leads to a significant decrease in the share of the potential of corn crops. Soybeans are the best precursor, after which even without tillage, corn productivity indicators are higher than after sunflower on the background of plowing.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean predecessor increased corn grain yield to 6.56–7.15 t/ha versus other predecessors.

Treatment
soybeans as a predecessore0
Outcome
corn grain yielde0
Direction
much highere0
Value
6.56–7.15 t/hae0
Comparator
other predecessorse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“use of soybeans as a predecessor had a positive effect on corn grain yield (6.56–7.15 t/ha), which was much higher than after other predecessors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–568 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plowing after sunflower gave the lowest yield, 6.29 t/ha.

Treatment
plowing was after sunflowere0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
loweste0
Value
6.29 t/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lowest yield for plowing was after sunflower — 6.29 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–630 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct sowing under minimized tillage gave a harvest of 0.59–2.55 t/ha.

Treatment
direct sowinge0
Outcome
harveste0
Value
0.59–2.55 t/hae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“minimization of soil tillage after all predecessors led to a reliable harvest, which was 0.59–2.55 t/ha for direct sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–757 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct sowing after soybean yielded more grain than plowing after sunflower.

Treatment
direct sowing after soybeane0
Outcome
harvest of corn graine0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
plowing after sunflowere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“harvest of corn grain for direct sowing after soybean was higher than for plowing after sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–878 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain starch content was inversely associated with yield, r = –0.74.

Outcome
Starch content in corn graine0
Direction
inversee0
Value
r = –0.74e0
Comparator
yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Starch content in corn grain had an inverse dependence on yield (r = –0.74)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–955 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Starch content after sunflower was 71.67–72.33%, higher than after soybean.

Treatment
sowing after sunflowere0
Outcome
corn cropst0
Direction
largere0
Value
71.67–72.33%e0
Comparator
after soybeane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“larger than for sowing after sunflower (71.67–72.33%), and the smallest — after soybean (70.63–71.47% )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1067 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–45 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Starch content after soybean was the smallest, at 70.63–71.47%.

Treatment
after soybeane0
Outcome
Starch content in corn graine1
Direction
smalleste0
Value
70.63–71.47%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“smallest — after soybean (70.63–71.47% )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1067 · show in text ↑
e1

“Starch content in corn grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–908 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Starch content had an inverse correlation with depth of soil cultivation, r = –0.59.

Treatment
depth of soil cultivatione0
Outcome
starch content in the graine0
Direction
inversee0
Value
r = –0.59e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“starch content in the grain was affected by the depth of soil cultivation and had an inverse correlation (r = –0.59)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1189 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Minimizing tillage tended to reduce cob biometric indicators, grain count and grain weight per cob.

Treatment
minimization of the basic tillagee0
Outcome
biometric indicators of the cobs, the amount of grains, and the weight of grain with 1 cobe0
Direction
reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With the minimization of the basic tillage, there was a general tendency to reduce the biometric indicators of the cobs, the amount of grains, and the weight of grain with 1 cob”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1368 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–45 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop structure indicators were inversely related to grain starch content, r = –0,51…–0.73.

Outcome
starch content in corn graine0
Direction
inversee0
Value
r = –0,51…–0.73e0
Comparator
indicators of the crop structuree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inverse relationship between the indicators of the crop structure and the starch content in corn grain was established (r = –0,51…–0.73)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1374–1510 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shallow tillage gave 0.06–0.67% less grain starch than no tillage.

Treatment
shallow tillagee0
Outcome
content of starch in graine0
Direction
lesse0
Value
0.06–0.67%e0
Comparator
variants without soil tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With shallow tillage, the content of starch in grain was less than in variants without soil tillage by 0.06–0.67%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1512–1625 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep plowing gave 0.57–0.97% less grain starch than no tillage.

Treatment
deep plowinge0
Outcome
content of starch in graine1
Direction
lesse1
Value
0.57–0.97%e0
Comparator
variants without soil tillagee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with deep plowing — by 0.57–0.97%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1631–1664 · show in text ↑
e1

“content of starch in grain was less than in variants without soil tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1538–1611 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–45 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep plowing gave the highest starch output, 4,51–5.05 t/ha.

Treatment
deep plowinge0
Outcome
yield of starche0
Direction
higheste0
Value
4,51–5.05 t/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“during deep plowing that the highest yield of starch and bio-ethanol was obtained from a unit area as a complex estimated indicator of crop productivity — 4,51–5.05 t/ha and 288.2–322.7 dal/ha (2.92–3,27 thousand l/ha) respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1691–1922 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–45 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep plowing gave the highest bioethanol output, 288.2–322.7 dal/ha.

Treatment
deep plowinge0
Outcome
bio-ethanole0
Direction
higheste0
Value
288.2–322.7 dal/hae0
Qualifier
2.92–3,27 thousand l/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“during deep plowing that the highest yield of starch and bio-ethanol was obtained from a unit area as a complex estimated indicator of crop productivity — 4,51–5.05 t/ha and 288.2–322.7 dal/ha (2.92–3,27 thousand l/ha) respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1691–1922 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shallow tillage reduced starch and bioethanol output by 4.1–6.8%.

Treatment
shallow soil tillagee0
Outcome
yield of starch and bio-ethanole1
Direction
lesse0
Value
4.1–6.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For shallow soil tillage, these figures were less by 4.1–6.8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1924–1985 · show in text ↑
e1

“yield of starch and bio-ethanol”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1728–1759 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct sowing reduced starch and bioethanol output by 7.1–37.4%.

Treatment
direct sowinge0
Outcome
yield of starch and bio-ethanole2
Direction
lesse1
Value
7.1–37.4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for direct sowing — by 7.1–37.4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1987–2019 · show in text ↑
e1

“these figures were less”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1950–1973 · show in text ↑
e2

“yield of starch and bio-ethanol”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1728–1759 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–45 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Starch and bioethanol output after soybean was higher than after plowing sunflower or repeated cropping.

Treatment
sowing after soybeane0
Outcome
output of starch and bio-ethanole0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
plowing after sunflower and in repeated cropse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“output of starch and bio-ethanol for corn sowing after soybean was higher than for plowing after sunflower and in repeated crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2025–2153 · show in text ↑

Glycine max · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

180 papers: 155 positive, 25 negative or no effect

154 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

176 papers more in this group

See all 180 papers →

transplanting · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

130 papers: 88 positive, 42 negative or no effect

87 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

126 papers more in this group

See all 130 papers →

tillage · quality: sugar starch · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

transplanting · quality: sugar starch · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.