Paper · 2025 · Food Chemistry X

Changes in chemical composition, volatile compound, and bioactive compounds retention in shallots (Allium ascalonicum L.) under different drying methods

Jiranan Ratseewo; Theeraphan Chumroenphat; Hua Li; et al.

12
claims
21
verbatim quotes
7
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Shallots ( Allium ascalonicum L.) are widely used in culinary and medicinal applications due to their rich bioactive compounds and health benefits. This study examines the effects of freeze drying, sun drying, and hot air drying at 40, 60, and 80 °C on chemical and bioactive compounds in shallots. Hot air drying at 80 °C had the highest total phenolic and flavonoid contents. Freeze drying increased syringic, p -coumaric, protocatechuic, vanillic, and ferulic acids. Quercetin was highest in freeze drying. Apigenin increased in samples that was dried by hot air drying at 80 °C. Proline was the major amino acid; arginine increased by 34 % in sun drying. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) revealed polysaccharides, lipids-proteins, and amino acids. Eucalyptol was the predominant volatile component in fresh shallot and most preserved by freeze drying. The results underscore the significance of choosing suitable drying methods to preserve shallot bioactive compounds and antioxidant properties. • Freeze-drying best preserves shallot microstructure and bioactive compounds. • Hot air drying at 80 °C yields the highest total phenolic and flavonoid contents. • Syringic, p -coumaric, and ferulic acids increased with freeze-drying treatment. • Drying methods significantly reduce fructooligosaccharides, sucrose, and stachyose. • Amino acid and volatile profiles varried significantly with different drying methods.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hot air drying at 80 °C gave the highest total phenolic and flavonoid contents.

Treatment
Hot air drying at 80 °Ce0
Outcome
total phenolic and flavonoid contentse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hot air drying at 80 °C had the highest total phenolic and flavonoid contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 299–376 · show in text ↑
t0

“shallots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Freeze drying increased syringic, p-coumaric and protocatechuic acids.

Treatment
Freeze dryinge0
Outcome
syringic, p -coumaric, protocatechuic, vanillic, and ferulic acidse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Freeze drying increased syringic, p -coumaric, protocatechuic, vanillic, and ferulic acids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–468 · show in text ↑
t0

“shallots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Quercetin was highest after freeze drying.

Treatment
freeze dryinge0
Outcome
Quercetine0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Quercetin was highest in freeze drying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–508 · show in text ↑
t0

“shallots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hot air drying at 80 °C increased apigenin.

Treatment
hot air drying at 80 °Ce0
Outcome
Apigenine0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Apigenin increased in samples that was dried by hot air drying at 80 °C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–581 · show in text ↑
t0

“shallots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–97 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline was the major amino acid.

Outcome
Proline was the major amino acide0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Proline was the major amino acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–615 · show in text ↑
t0

“shallots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sun drying increased arginine by 34%.

Treatment
sun dryinge0
Outcome
argininee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
34 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“arginine increased by 34 % in sun drying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–657 · show in text ↑
t0

“shallots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–97 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FTIR revealed polysaccharides, lipids-proteins and amino acids.

Outcome
polysaccharides, lipids-proteins, and amino acidse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) revealed polysaccharides, lipids-proteins, and amino acids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–764 · show in text ↑
t0

“shallots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–97 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eucalyptol predominated in fresh shallot.

Organ / stage
fresh shallote0
Outcome
Eucalyptol was the predominant volatile componente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Eucalyptol was the predominant volatile component in fresh shallot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–832 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Freeze drying best preserved eucalyptol.

Treatment
freeze dryinge0
Outcome
Eucalyptole0
Direction
most preservede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Eucalyptol was the predominant volatile component in fresh shallot and most preserved by freeze drying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–868 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Freeze drying best preserved shallot microstructure and bioactive compounds.

Treatment
Freeze-dryinge0
Outcome
microstructure and bioactive compoundse0
Direction
best preservese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Freeze-drying best preserves shallot microstructure and bioactive compounds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1091 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drying significantly reduced fructooligosaccharides, sucrose and stachyose.

Treatment
Drying methodse0
Outcome
fructooligosaccharides, sucrose, and stachyosee0
Direction
reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drying methods significantly reduce fructooligosaccharides, sucrose, and stachyose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1344 · show in text ↑
t0

“shallots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–97 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Amino acid and volatile profiles varied significantly among drying methods.

Treatment
different drying methodse0
Outcome
Amino acid and volatile profilese0
Direction
varriede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Amino acid and volatile profiles varried significantly with different drying methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1348–1432 · show in text ↑
t0

“shallots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–97 · show in text ↑

cold · molecular: metabolites · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

processing · molecular: metabolites · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

processing · quality: phytochemicals · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 12 positive, 7 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

cold · quality: phytochemicals · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.