Paper · 2025 · Plant Cell & Environment

Both Proteins/Peptides and Non‐Proteins/Peptides in Larval Oral Secretions of a Chewing Herbivore Function as Elicitors That Induce Plant Defenses

Shiyun Jing; Shuting Chen; Yayun Xu; et al.

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Herbivore elicitors, most of which identified thus far are from the oral secretions (OS) of herbivores, are important in herbivore-induced plant defense. However, whether and how larval OS of the striped stem borer (SSB), Chilo suppressalis, a devastating pest on rice, induce plant defenses remains largely unknown. We found that treating plants with SSB OS enhanced levels of phosphorylated OsMPK3/4/6, JA, JA-Ile, ethylene, and ABA in rice, which subsequently induced the production of defense compounds, such as trypsin protease inhibitors, and decreased the growth of SSB larvae. Digestion by proteinase K decreased the induction activity of SSB OS on rice defense, but it still activated OsMPK6, JA, ABA, and ethylene pathways, and enhanced plant SSB resistance. Treating plants with SSB OS fractions that did not contain fatty acid-amino acid conjugates (FACs) activated OsMPK3/4/6, JA, ABA, and ethylene pathways, whereas treating plants with other OS fractions containing FACs did not. Bioassays revealed that impairing the JA or ABA signaling pathway in rice decreased plant SSB resistance. These results demonstrate that both proteins/peptides and non-proteins/peptides-but not FACs-in SSB OS play a central role in inducing rice defenses by activating signaling pathways mediated by JA, ABA, and ethylene.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SSB oral secretions enhanced OsMPK3/4/6 phosphorylation and hormone levels in rice.

Treatment
SSB OSe0
Outcome
phosphorylated OsMPK3/4/6, JA, JA-Ile, ethylene, and ABAe0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treating plants with SSB OS enhanced levels of phosphorylated OsMPK3/4/6, JA, JA-Ile, ethylene, and ABA in rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–442 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oral secretions induced trypsin protease inhibitor production.

Treatment
Larval Oral Secretionst0
Outcome
trypsin protease inhibitorse0
Direction
inducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“which subsequently induced the production of defense compounds, such as trypsin protease inhibitors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–543 · show in text ↑
t0

“Larval Oral Secretions of a Chewing Herbivore Function as Elicitors That Induce Plant Defenses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–146 · show in text ↑
e1

“treating plants with SSB OS enhanced levels of phosphorylated OsMPK3/4/6, JA, JA-Ile, ethylene, and ABA in rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–442 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oral secretions decreased SSB larval growth.

Treatment
Larval Oral Secretionst0
Interactor
SSB larvaee0pestt0
Outcome
growth of SSB larvaee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“and decreased the growth of SSB larvae.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–584 · show in text ↑
t0

“Larval Oral Secretions of a Chewing Herbivore Function as Elicitors That Induce Plant Defenses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–146 · show in text ↑
e1

“treating plants with SSB OS enhanced levels of phosphorylated OsMPK3/4/6, JA, JA-Ile, ethylene, and ABA in rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–442 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proteinase K digestion decreased oral secretion induction of rice defense.

Treatment
Digestion by proteinase Ke0
Outcome
induction activity of SSB OS on rice defensee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Digestion by proteinase K decreased the induction activity of SSB OS on rice defense”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–669 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Digested secretions still activated signaling pathways and enhanced resistance.

Outcome
OsMPK6, JA, ABA, and ethylene pathwayse0
Direction
activatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but it still activated OsMPK6, JA, ABA, and ethylene pathways, and enhanced plant SSB resistance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–768 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chewing Herbivore”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–97 · show in text ↑
e1

“treating plants with SSB OS enhanced levels of phosphorylated OsMPK3/4/6, JA, JA-Ile, ethylene, and ABA in rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–442 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fractions without FACs activated OsMPK and hormone pathways.

Treatment
SSB OS fractions that did not contain fatty acid-amino acid conjugates (FACs)e0
Outcome
OsMPK3/4/6, JA, ABA, and ethylene pathwayse0
Direction
activatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treating plants with SSB OS fractions that did not contain fatty acid-amino acid conjugates (FACs) activated OsMPK3/4/6, JA, ABA, and ethylene pathways”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–920 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chewing Herbivore”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–97 · show in text ↑
e1

“treating plants with SSB OS enhanced levels of phosphorylated OsMPK3/4/6, JA, JA-Ile, ethylene, and ABA in rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–442 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FAC-containing fractions did not activate the pathways.

Outcome
did note0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“whereas treating plants with other OS fractions containing FACs did not.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–994 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chewing Herbivore”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–97 · show in text ↑
e1

“treating plants with SSB OS enhanced levels of phosphorylated OsMPK3/4/6, JA, JA-Ile, ethylene, and ABA in rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–442 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Impairing JA signaling decreased rice SSB resistance.

Treatment
JAe0
Outcome
plant SSB resistancee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“impairing the JA or ABA signaling pathway in rice decreased plant SSB resistance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Impairing ABA signaling decreased rice SSB resistance.

Treatment
ABAe0
Outcome
plant SSB resistancee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“impairing the JA or ABA signaling pathway in rice decreased plant SSB resistance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1100 · show in text ↑

jasmonic acid · disease · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 3 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

(+)-abscisic acid · disease · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 18 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.