Paper · 2025 · Journal of Experimental Agriculture International

Investigating the Synergistic Effects of Biofertilizers, Micronutrients and Biostimulants on Fruit Quality of Strawberry Cv. Nabila

Harinee S; Vinu Radha R; Praveena Katherine S; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) is a high-value fruit crop with substantial economic and nutritional benefits. This study assesses how nutrient and biostimulant management influences the quality of strawberry cv. 'Nabila' grown in the Nilgiris of TamilNadu. A factorial experiment was carried out to evaluate the effect of combinations of biofertilizers, micronutrients, and biostimulants on fruit quality parameters of strawberry. The findings revealed that treatments including Arbuscular Micorhizal Fungi (AMF) and potassium-solubilizing bacteria (KSB), as well as a micronutrient mix (0.6%) with humic acid (1%) and seaweed extract (1%), greatly increased fruit production and quality. This combination resulted in higher total soluble solids, total phenols, and titratable acidity. An integrated nutrient management strategy, incorporating AMF and KSB in combination with micronutrients and biostimulants such as humic acid and seaweed extract, presents a promising approach to improving both the quality and post-harvest attributes of strawberries. Additionally, the adoption of such a bio-enhanced fertilization approach promotes soil health, reduces reliance on synthetic inputs, and aligns with environmentally sustainable agricultural practices.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined nutrient and biostimulant treatment increased strawberry fruit production.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
Arbuscular Micorhizal Fungi (AMF) and potassium-solubilizing bacteria (KSB), as well as a micronutrient mix (0.6%) with humic acid (1%) and seaweed extract (1%)e0
Interactor
Arbuscular Micorhizal Fungi (AMF)e0symbiont
Second interactor
potassium-solubilizing bacteria (KSB)e0symbiont
Outcome
fruit productione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatments including Arbuscular Micorhizal Fungi (AMF) and potassium-solubilizing bacteria (KSB), as well as a micronutrient mix (0.6%) with humic acid (1%) and seaweed extract (1%), greatly increased fruit production and quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 460–690 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment increased strawberry fruit quality.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
Arbuscular Micorhizal Fungi (AMF) and potassium-solubilizing bacteria (KSB), as well as a micronutrient mix (0.6%) with humic acid (1%) and seaweed extract (1%)e0
Interactor
Arbuscular Micorhizal Fungi (AMF)e0symbiont
Second interactor
potassium-solubilizing bacteria (KSB)e0symbiont
Outcome
qualitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatments including Arbuscular Micorhizal Fungi (AMF) and potassium-solubilizing bacteria (KSB), as well as a micronutrient mix (0.6%) with humic acid (1%) and seaweed extract (1%), greatly increased fruit production and quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 460–690 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination increased strawberry total soluble solids, total phenols and titratable acidity.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
Arbuscular Micorhizal Fungi (AMF) and potassium-solubilizing bacteria (KSB), as well as a micronutrient mix (0.6%) with humic acid (1%) and seaweed extract (1%)e1
Interactor
Arbuscular Micorhizal Fungi (AMF)e1symbiont
Second interactor
potassium-solubilizing bacteria (KSB)e1symbiont
Outcome
total soluble solids, total phenols, and titratable aciditye0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This combination resulted in higher total soluble solids, total phenols, and titratable acidity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–787 · show in text ↑
e1

“treatments including Arbuscular Micorhizal Fungi (AMF) and potassium-solubilizing bacteria (KSB), as well as a micronutrient mix (0.6%) with humic acid (1%) and seaweed extract (1%), greatly increased fruit production and quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 460–690 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–32 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend integrated nutrient management to improve strawberry quality and post-harvest attributes.

Taxon
strawberriesFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
integrated nutrient management strategye0
Outcome
quality and post-harvest attributese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An integrated nutrient management strategy, incorporating AMF and KSB in combination with micronutrients and biostimulants such as humic acid and seaweed extract, presents a promising approach to improving both the quality and post-harvest attributes of strawberries.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–1055 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors state that bio-enhanced fertilization promotes soil health and reduces reliance on synthetic inputs.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
bio-enhanced fertilization approache0
Outcome
soil health, reduces reliance on synthetic inputse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the adoption of such a bio-enhanced fertilization approach promotes soil health, reduces reliance on synthetic inputs, and aligns with environmentally sustainable agricultural practices.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1256 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–32 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · quality: sugar starch · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results differ

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

other · quality: sugar starch · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results differ

16 papers: 13 positive, 3 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

inoculation · quality: sugar starch · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results differ

26 papers: 23 positive, 3 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

mycorrhiza · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results differ

34 papers: 30 positive, 4 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

inoculation · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results differ

67 papers: 60 positive, 7 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

63 papers more in this group

See all 67 papers →

micronutrient · quality: sugar starch · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

micronutrient · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · quality: general · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

8 of 17 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.