Paper · 2025 · Social science review archives.

Use of Potash to Improve Sugar Cane Quality Under Various Water Stress Levels.

Abdul Mannan; Khalid Hussain; Zain ul Islam; et al.

7
claims
17
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Pakistan is projected to face an increasing water shortage in the future due to climate change, which will significantly impact sugarcane yields. To assess the effects of various potash levels on sugarcane crops in response to water scarcity, an experiment was conducted using a randomized complete block design with three replications at Bahauddin Zakariya University in Multan. The number of irrigations were selected as 10, 12 and 14 times. Potash was applied through soil (33%), foliar (33%) and fertigation (33%). The results indicated that water shortage adversely affected all observed parameters. Optimal irrigation improved the number of tillers, stem girth, number of millable canes, brix percentage, sugar recovery percentage, and overall sugarcane production. Application of potash at different levels increased the sugar recovery approximately 0.2-0.3%. Furthermore, increased potash application positively influenced tiller growth, stem girth, brix percentage, sugar recovery percentage, and overall production, achieving about an 85% improvement compared to conditions of water scarcity. Thus, integrating potash application with effective irrigation strategies can help mitigate the negative effects of water shortage on sugarcane yields and promote more cost-effective sugarcane production and recovery.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water shortage adversely affected all observed sugarcane parameters compared with optimal irrigation.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
water shortagee1
Outcome
all observed parameterse1
Direction
adversely affectede1
Comparator
Optimal irrigatione2

Verbatim

e0

“effects of various potash levels on sugarcane crops in response to water scarcity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 160–241 · show in text ↑
e1

“water shortage adversely affected all observed parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–603 · show in text ↑
e2

“Optimal irrigation improved the number of tillers, stem girth, number of millable canes, brix percentage, sugar recovery percentage, and overall sugarcane production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–770 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimal irrigation improved the number of tillers, stem girth and number of millable canes compared with water shortage.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
Optimal irrigatione2
Outcome
number of tillers, stem girth, number of millable canese2
Direction
improvede2
Comparator
water shortagee1

Verbatim

e0

“effects of various potash levels on sugarcane crops in response to water scarcity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 160–241 · show in text ↑
e1

“water shortage adversely affected all observed parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–603 · show in text ↑
e2

“Optimal irrigation improved the number of tillers, stem girth, number of millable canes, brix percentage, sugar recovery percentage, and overall sugarcane production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–770 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimal irrigation improved brix percentage, sugar recovery percentage and overall sugarcane production compared with water shortage.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
Optimal irrigatione2
Outcome
brix percentage, sugar recovery percentage, and overall sugarcane productione2
Direction
improvede2
Comparator
water shortagee1

Verbatim

e0

“effects of various potash levels on sugarcane crops in response to water scarcity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 160–241 · show in text ↑
e1

“water shortage adversely affected all observed parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–603 · show in text ↑
e2

“Optimal irrigation improved the number of tillers, stem girth, number of millable canes, brix percentage, sugar recovery percentage, and overall sugarcane production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–770 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potash application increased sugar recovery by approximately 0.2-0.3%.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
Application of potash at different levelse3
Outcome
sugar recoverye3
Direction
increasede3
Value
approximately 0.2-0.3%e3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“effects of various potash levels on sugarcane crops in response to water scarcity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 160–241 · show in text ↑
e3

“Application of potash at different levels increased the sugar recovery approximately 0.2-0.3%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–865 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased potash application positively influenced tiller growth, stem girth and brix percentage compared with water scarcity.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
increased potash applicatione4
Outcome
tiller growth, stem girth, brix percentagee4
Direction
positively influencede4
Comparator
conditions of water scarcitye4

Verbatim

e0

“effects of various potash levels on sugarcane crops in response to water scarcity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 160–241 · show in text ↑
e4

“increased potash application positively influenced tiller growth, stem girth, brix percentage, sugar recovery percentage, and overall production, achieving about an 85% improvement compared to conditions of water scarcity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–1101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased potash application positively influenced sugar recovery and overall production, with about an 85% improvement compared with water scarcity.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
increased potash applicatione4
Outcome
sugar recovery percentage, and overall productione4
Direction
positively influencede4
Value
85%e4
Comparator
conditions of water scarcitye4

Verbatim

e0

“effects of various potash levels on sugarcane crops in response to water scarcity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 160–241 · show in text ↑
e4

“increased potash application positively influenced tiller growth, stem girth, brix percentage, sugar recovery percentage, and overall production, achieving about an 85% improvement compared to conditions of water scarcity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–1101 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend integrating potash application with effective irrigation strategies to mitigate water shortage effects on sugarcane yields.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Outcome
integrating potash application with effective irrigation strategiese5

Verbatim

e0

“effects of various potash levels on sugarcane crops in response to water scarcity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 160–241 · show in text ↑
e5

“integrating potash application with effective irrigation strategies can help mitigate the negative effects of water shortage on sugarcane yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1253 · show in text ↑

potassium · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

18 papers: 16 positive, 2 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

potassium · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

57 papers: 50 positive, 7 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

irrigation · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 24 positive, 17 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

irrigation · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

142 papers: 129 positive, 13 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

138 papers more in this group

See all 142 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.