Abstract
Abstract The results of a study that examined the effects of spraying local fig plants with the growth regulators Atonic and Greetnal revealed notable variations in the majority of the vegetative traits that were examined, including stem height and thickness, number of leaves, and area, when spraying with Atonic (95.6 cm, 12.26 mm, 21.00 leaves. plant −1 , and 178.0 cm 2 ), respectively. At the 4 ml l −1 level, however, the Greetnal treatment was noticeably better in terms of the number of branches characteristic, recording 7.11 branches. plant −1 . The treatment with growth regulators at the level of 4 ml l −1 Atonic and 4 ml l −1 Greetnal substantially outperformed all examined traits, reaching 101.0 cm, 13.30 mm, 24.33 leaf.plant −1 , 195.4 cm 2 , and 9.67 branch.plant −1 , respectively, indicating the impact of the interaction between Atonic and Greetnal. While the Greetnal spray treatment at level 4 ml l −1 was significantly superior in the leaf content of phosphorus, recording (0.249%), the atonic spray treatment at level 4 ml l −1 was significantly superior in the majority of the chemical characteristics studied in the experiment, including the leaf content of N and K, carbohydrates, and chlorophyll, reaching 1.831% and 1.817% and 18.35% and 20.74 SPAD, respectively. Regarding how the two experimental elements interact in both directions, the atonic spray treatment Greetnal 4 ml l −1 was better in every category at the level of 4 ml l −1 , reaching 1.997%, 0.344%, and 1.993%. 23.60 and 20.51% SPAD.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 15
Claim · model-written summary
Atonic spraying produced stem height of 95.6 cm.
- Taxon
- Ficus carica L.
_(Ficus_carica)_-_Cagliari%2C_Italy_2024-03-26.jpg?width=60)
Ficus caricat0 - Treatment
- Atonice0
- Outcome
- stem heighte1
- Value
- 95.6 cme0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_(Ficus_carica)_-_Cagliari%2C_Italy_2024-03-26.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“spraying with Atonic (95.6 cm, 12.26 mm, 21.00 leaves. plant −1 , and 178.0 cm 2 )”
t0“Local Fig Plants Ficus carica L.”
e1“including stem height and thickness, number of leaves, and area, when spraying with Atonic (95.6 cm, 12.26 mm, 21.00 leaves. plant −1 , and 178.0 cm 2 )”
e2“number of branches characteristic, recording 7.11 branches. plant −1”
Claim · model-written summary
Atonic spraying produced stem thickness of 12.26 mm.
- Taxon
- Ficus carica L.Ficus caricat0
- Treatment
- Atonice0
- Outcome
- thicknesse0
- Value
- 12.26 mme0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“including stem height and thickness, number of leaves, and area, when spraying with Atonic (95.6 cm, 12.26 mm, 21.00 leaves. plant −1 , and 178.0 cm 2 )”
t0“Local Fig Plants Ficus carica L.”
e1“including stem height and thickness, number of leaves, and area, when spraying with Atonic (95.6 cm, 12.26 mm, 21.00 leaves. plant −1 , and 178.0 cm 2 )”
e2“number of branches characteristic, recording 7.11 branches. plant −1”
Claim · model-written summary
Atonic spraying produced 21.00 leaves per plant.
- Taxon
- Ficus carica L.Ficus caricat0
- Treatment
- Atonice0
- Outcome
- number of leavese0
- Value
- 21.00 leaves. plant −1e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“number of leaves, and area, when spraying with Atonic (95.6 cm, 12.26 mm, 21.00 leaves. plant −1 , and 178.0 cm 2 )”
t0“Local Fig Plants Ficus carica L.”
e1“including stem height and thickness, number of leaves, and area, when spraying with Atonic (95.6 cm, 12.26 mm, 21.00 leaves. plant −1 , and 178.0 cm 2 )”
e2“number of branches characteristic, recording 7.11 branches. plant −1”
Claim · model-written summary
Atonic spraying produced leaf area of 178.0 cm2.
- Taxon
- Ficus carica L.Ficus caricat0
- Treatment
- Atonice0
- Outcome
- areae0
- Value
- 178.0 cm 2e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“area, when spraying with Atonic (95.6 cm, 12.26 mm, 21.00 leaves. plant −1 , and 178.0 cm 2 )”
t0“Local Fig Plants Ficus carica L.”
e1“including stem height and thickness, number of leaves, and area, when spraying with Atonic (95.6 cm, 12.26 mm, 21.00 leaves. plant −1 , and 178.0 cm 2 )”
e2“number of branches characteristic, recording 7.11 branches. plant −1”
Claim · model-written summary
Greetnal at 4 ml l−1 gave 7.11 branches per plant.
- Taxon
- Ficus carica L.Ficus caricat0
- Treatment
- Greetnal treatmente0
- Outcome
- number of branchese0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Value
- 7.11 branches. plant −1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“At the 4 ml l −1 level, however, the Greetnal treatment was noticeably better in terms of the number of branches characteristic, recording 7.11 branches. plant −1 .”
t0“Local Fig Plants Ficus carica L.”
e1“including stem height and thickness, number of leaves, and area, when spraying with Atonic (95.6 cm, 12.26 mm, 21.00 leaves. plant −1 , and 178.0 cm 2 )”
e2“number of branches characteristic, recording 7.11 branches. plant −1”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined Atonic and Greetnal at 4 ml l−1 gave 101.0 cm stem height.
- Taxon
- Ficus carica L.Ficus caricat0
- Treatment
- 4 ml l −1 Atonic and 4 ml l −1 Greetnale0
- Outcome
- stem heighte1
- Direction
- outperformede0
- Value
- 101.0 cme0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“4 ml l −1 Atonic and 4 ml l −1 Greetnal substantially outperformed all examined traits, reaching 101.0 cm, 13.30 mm, 24.33 leaf.plant −1 , 195.4 cm 2 , and 9.67 branch.plant −1”
t0“Local Fig Plants Ficus carica L.”
e1“including stem height and thickness, number of leaves, and area, when spraying with Atonic (95.6 cm, 12.26 mm, 21.00 leaves. plant −1 , and 178.0 cm 2 )”
e2“number of branches characteristic, recording 7.11 branches. plant −1”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined treatment gave 13.30 mm stem thickness.
- Taxon
- Ficus carica L.Ficus caricat0
- Treatment
- 4 ml l −1 Atonic and 4 ml l −1 Greetnale0
- Outcome
- thicknesse1
- Direction
- outperformede0
- Value
- 13.30 mme0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“4 ml l −1 Atonic and 4 ml l −1 Greetnal substantially outperformed all examined traits, reaching 101.0 cm, 13.30 mm, 24.33 leaf.plant −1 , 195.4 cm 2 , and 9.67 branch.plant −1”
t0“Local Fig Plants Ficus carica L.”
e1“including stem height and thickness, number of leaves, and area, when spraying with Atonic (95.6 cm, 12.26 mm, 21.00 leaves. plant −1 , and 178.0 cm 2 )”
e2“number of branches characteristic, recording 7.11 branches. plant −1”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined treatment gave 24.33 leaves per plant.
- Taxon
- Ficus carica L.Ficus caricat0
- Treatment
- 4 ml l −1 Atonic and 4 ml l −1 Greetnale0
- Outcome
- number of leavese1
- Direction
- outperformede0
- Value
- 24.33 leaf.plant −1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“4 ml l −1 Atonic and 4 ml l −1 Greetnal substantially outperformed all examined traits, reaching 101.0 cm, 13.30 mm, 24.33 leaf.plant −1 , 195.4 cm 2 , and 9.67 branch.plant −1”
t0“Local Fig Plants Ficus carica L.”
e1“including stem height and thickness, number of leaves, and area, when spraying with Atonic (95.6 cm, 12.26 mm, 21.00 leaves. plant −1 , and 178.0 cm 2 )”
e2“number of branches characteristic, recording 7.11 branches. plant −1”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined treatment gave leaf area of 195.4 cm2.
- Taxon
- Ficus carica L.Ficus caricat0
- Treatment
- 4 ml l −1 Atonic and 4 ml l −1 Greetnale0
- Outcome
- areae1
- Direction
- outperformede0
- Value
- 195.4 cm 2e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“4 ml l −1 Atonic and 4 ml l −1 Greetnal substantially outperformed all examined traits, reaching 101.0 cm, 13.30 mm, 24.33 leaf.plant −1 , 195.4 cm 2 , and 9.67 branch.plant −1”
t0“Local Fig Plants Ficus carica L.”
e1“including stem height and thickness, number of leaves, and area, when spraying with Atonic (95.6 cm, 12.26 mm, 21.00 leaves. plant −1 , and 178.0 cm 2 )”
e2“number of branches characteristic, recording 7.11 branches. plant −1”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined treatment gave 9.67 branches per plant.
- Taxon
- Ficus carica L.Ficus caricat0
- Treatment
- 4 ml l −1 Atonic and 4 ml l −1 Greetnale0
- Outcome
- number of branchese2
- Direction
- outperformede0
- Value
- 9.67 branch.plant −1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“4 ml l −1 Atonic and 4 ml l −1 Greetnal substantially outperformed all examined traits, reaching 101.0 cm, 13.30 mm, 24.33 leaf.plant −1 , 195.4 cm 2 , and 9.67 branch.plant −1”
t0“Local Fig Plants Ficus carica L.”
e1“including stem height and thickness, number of leaves, and area, when spraying with Atonic (95.6 cm, 12.26 mm, 21.00 leaves. plant −1 , and 178.0 cm 2 )”
e2“number of branches characteristic, recording 7.11 branches. plant −1”
Claim · model-written summary
Greetnal at 4 ml l−1 significantly improved leaf phosphorus to 0.249%.
- Taxon
- Ficus carica L.Ficus caricat0
- Treatment
- Greetnal spray treatment at level 4 ml l −1e0
- Outcome
- leaf content of phosphoruse0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Value
- 0.249%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Greetnal spray treatment at level 4 ml l −1 was significantly superior in the leaf content of phosphorus, recording (0.249%)”
t0“Local Fig Plants Ficus carica L.”
e1“including stem height and thickness, number of leaves, and area, when spraying with Atonic (95.6 cm, 12.26 mm, 21.00 leaves. plant −1 , and 178.0 cm 2 )”
e2“number of branches characteristic, recording 7.11 branches. plant −1”
Claim · model-written summary
Atonic at 4 ml l−1 significantly improved leaf nitrogen to 1.831%.
- Taxon
- Ficus carica L.Ficus caricat0
- Treatment
- atonic spray treatment at level 4 ml l −1e0
- Outcome
- leaf content of Ne0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Value
- 1.831%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“atonic spray treatment at level 4 ml l −1 was significantly superior in the majority of the chemical characteristics studied in the experiment, including the leaf content of N and K, carbohydrates, and chlorophyll, reaching 1.831% and 1.817% and 18.35% and 20.74 SPAD, respectively.”
t0“Local Fig Plants Ficus carica L.”
e1“including stem height and thickness, number of leaves, and area, when spraying with Atonic (95.6 cm, 12.26 mm, 21.00 leaves. plant −1 , and 178.0 cm 2 )”
e2“number of branches characteristic, recording 7.11 branches. plant −1”
Claim · model-written summary
Atonic at 4 ml l−1 significantly improved leaf potassium to 1.817%.
- Taxon
- Ficus carica L.Ficus caricat0
- Treatment
- atonic spray treatment at level 4 ml l −1e0
- Outcome
- leaf content of N and Ke0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Value
- 1.817%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“atonic spray treatment at level 4 ml l −1 was significantly superior in the majority of the chemical characteristics studied in the experiment, including the leaf content of N and K, carbohydrates, and chlorophyll, reaching 1.831% and 1.817% and 18.35% and 20.74 SPAD, respectively.”
t0“Local Fig Plants Ficus carica L.”
e1“including stem height and thickness, number of leaves, and area, when spraying with Atonic (95.6 cm, 12.26 mm, 21.00 leaves. plant −1 , and 178.0 cm 2 )”
e2“number of branches characteristic, recording 7.11 branches. plant −1”
Claim · model-written summary
Atonic at 4 ml l−1 significantly improved carbohydrates to 18.35%.
- Taxon
- Ficus carica L.Ficus caricat0
- Treatment
- atonic spray treatment at level 4 ml l −1e0
- Outcome
- carbohydratese0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Value
- 18.35%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“atonic spray treatment at level 4 ml l −1 was significantly superior in the majority of the chemical characteristics studied in the experiment, including the leaf content of N and K, carbohydrates, and chlorophyll, reaching 1.831% and 1.817% and 18.35% and 20.74 SPAD, respectively.”
t0“Local Fig Plants Ficus carica L.”
e1“including stem height and thickness, number of leaves, and area, when spraying with Atonic (95.6 cm, 12.26 mm, 21.00 leaves. plant −1 , and 178.0 cm 2 )”
e2“number of branches characteristic, recording 7.11 branches. plant −1”
Claim · model-written summary
Atonic at 4 ml l−1 significantly improved chlorophyll to 20.74 SPAD.
- Taxon
- Ficus carica L.Ficus caricat0
- Treatment
- atonic spray treatment at level 4 ml l −1e0
- Outcome
- chlorophylle0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Value
- 20.74 SPADe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“atonic spray treatment at level 4 ml l −1 was significantly superior in the majority of the chemical characteristics studied in the experiment, including the leaf content of N and K, carbohydrates, and chlorophyll, reaching 1.831% and 1.817% and 18.35% and 20.74 SPAD, respectively.”
t0“Local Fig Plants Ficus carica L.”
e1“including stem height and thickness, number of leaves, and area, when spraying with Atonic (95.6 cm, 12.26 mm, 21.00 leaves. plant −1 , and 178.0 cm 2 )”
e2“number of branches characteristic, recording 7.11 branches. plant −1”
The same questions in other papers
application · quality: sugar starch · Ficus carica (common fig)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →application · physiology: pigments · Ficus carica (common fig)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
application · molecular: metabolites · Ficus carica (common fig)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.