Paper · 2025 · Tropical Journal of Natural Product Research

Enhancing Shallot (Allium cepa L.) Resilience to Salt Stress Levels through the Application of Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria and Goat Manure

Andi Kurniawan; Anna Karyawati; Aldila Rahayu; et al.

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Salinity is a major challenge to optimizing plant production worldwide. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and goat manure have been shown to alleviate the negative effects of salt stress. This study aims to investigate the mechanism by which PGPR and goat manure mitigate salt stress and enhance shallot yield. Conducted from July to November 2023 in Poncokusumo, Malang, this study employed a randomized block- design (RBD) with three treatment factors: salinity (0 and 150 mM NaCl), PGPR concentration (0, 10, and 20 ml L-1), and goat manure (0, 10, and 20 t ha-1). A combination of 20 ml L-1 PGPR and 20 t ha-1 goat manure was applied to evaluate its effect on plant growth and yield components under both normal or salt stress conditions. The results showed that 150 mM NaCl significantly reduced plant growth variables (leaf number, leaf area, tiller number, biomass) and yield parameters (bulbs number, bulb diameter, bulb fresh weight). The combination of 20 ml L-1 PGPR and 20 t ha-1 goat manure treatment led to greater improvements in plant morphology compared to untreated plants, both under normal and stressed conditions. This treatment also enhanced relative chlorophyll content and relative water content (RWC). Additionally, salinity increased osmoprotectant levels, such as proline and flavonoids. Moreover, the treatment of PGPR and goat manure under salinity significantly boosted these compounds, which are crucial for salinity defense. Our findings suggest that the combined use of rhizobacteria and biofertilizers as soil organic amendments under salinity stress can improve crop resilience and yield, supporting sustainable agricultural practices.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

150 mM NaCl significantly reduced shallot leaf number, leaf area and tiller number.

Taxon
Shallot (Allium cepa L.)Allium cepat0
Treatment
150 mM NaCle1
Outcome
leaf number, leaf area, tiller numbere1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Shallot (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–34 · show in text ↑
e1

“150 mM NaCl significantly reduced plant growth variables (leaf number, leaf area, tiller number, biomass) and yield parameters (bulbs number, bulb diameter, bulb fresh weight)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–952 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

150 mM NaCl significantly reduced shallot biomass.

Taxon
Shallot (Allium cepa L.)Allium cepat0
Treatment
150 mM NaCle1
Outcome
biomasse1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Shallot (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–34 · show in text ↑
e1

“150 mM NaCl significantly reduced plant growth variables (leaf number, leaf area, tiller number, biomass) and yield parameters (bulbs number, bulb diameter, bulb fresh weight)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–952 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

150 mM NaCl significantly reduced shallot bulb number, bulb diameter and bulb fresh weight.

Taxon
Shallot (Allium cepa L.)Allium cepat0
Treatment
150 mM NaCle1
Outcome
bulbs number, bulb diameter, bulb fresh weighte1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Shallot (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–34 · show in text ↑
e1

“150 mM NaCl significantly reduced plant growth variables (leaf number, leaf area, tiller number, biomass) and yield parameters (bulbs number, bulb diameter, bulb fresh weight)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–952 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of 20 ml L-1 PGPR and 20 t ha-1 goat manure gave greater improvements in shallot morphology than untreated plants, under both normal and stressed conditions.

Taxon
Shallot (Allium cepa L.)Allium cepat0
Treatment
20 ml L-1 PGPR and 20 t ha-1 goat manuree2
Outcome
plant morphologye2
Direction
greater improvementse2
Qualifier
both under normal and stressed conditionse2
Comparator
untreated plantse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Shallot (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–34 · show in text ↑
e2

“The combination of 20 ml L-1 PGPR and 20 t ha-1 goat manure treatment led to greater improvements in plant morphology compared to untreated plants, both under normal and stressed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1143 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The PGPR and goat manure combination enhanced relative chlorophyll content and relative water content of shallot.

Taxon
Shallot (Allium cepa L.)Allium cepat0
Treatment
20 ml L-1 PGPR and 20 t ha-1 goat manuree2
Outcome
relative chlorophyll content and relative water content (RWC)e3
Direction
enhancede3
Comparator
untreated plantse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Shallot (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–34 · show in text ↑
e2

“The combination of 20 ml L-1 PGPR and 20 t ha-1 goat manure treatment led to greater improvements in plant morphology compared to untreated plants, both under normal and stressed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1143 · show in text ↑
e3

“This treatment also enhanced relative chlorophyll content and relative water content (RWC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1235 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity increased osmoprotectant levels, such as proline and flavonoids, in shallot.

Taxon
Shallot (Allium cepa L.)Allium cepat0
Treatment
salinitye4
Compound
proline and flavonoidse4
Outcome
osmoprotectant levelse4
Direction
increasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Shallot (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–34 · show in text ↑
e4

“Additionally, salinity increased osmoprotectant levels, such as proline and flavonoids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1323 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPR and goat manure under salinity significantly boosted the osmoprotectant compounds of shallot.

Taxon
Shallot (Allium cepa L.)Allium cepat0
Treatment
the treatment of PGPR and goat manure under salinitye5
Outcome
these compoundse5
Direction
boostede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Shallot (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–34 · show in text ↑
e5

“Moreover, the treatment of PGPR and goat manure under salinity significantly boosted these compounds, which are crucial for salinity defense”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1325–1465 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend combined rhizobacteria and biofertilizer use as soil organic amendments under salinity stress to improve shallot resilience and yield.

Taxon
Shallot (Allium cepa L.)Allium cepat0
Outcome
crop resilience and yielde6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Shallot (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–34 · show in text ↑
e6

“the combined use of rhizobacteria and biofertilizers as soil organic amendments under salinity stress can improve crop resilience and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1493–1632 · show in text ↑

sodium chloride · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

12 papers: 0 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

inoculation · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

99 papers: 89 positive, 10 negative or no effect

88 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

95 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

fertilization · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

294 papers: 251 positive, 43 negative or no effect

250 papers in the same direction as this paper · 40 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

290 papers more in this group

See all 294 papers →

inoculation · physiology: water · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · physiology: water · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.