Paper · 2023 · Life

Combined Soil Microorganism Amendments and Foliar Micronutrient Nanofertilization Increased the Production of Allium cepa L. through Aquaporin Gene Regulation

José A. Berna-Sicilia; Mercy Quizhpe-Romero; María Hurtado-Navarro; et al.

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
4
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

L.) plants when subjected to dual applications of microorganism-based soil amendments and foliar nanoencapsulated mineral nutrients. Multiple physiological parameters related to water, gas exchange, and nutrient content in leaf, root, and bulb tissues were determined. Additionally, the gene expression of aquaporins, specifically PIP1, PIP2 (aquaporin subfamily plasma membrane intrinsic protein), and TIP2 (aquaporin subfamily tonoplast intrinsic protein), was analyzed. The findings revealed that the foliar application of nutrients in a nanoencapsulated form significantly enhanced nutrient penetration, mobilization, and overall plant growth to a greater extent than free-form fertilizers. Amendments with microorganisms alone did not promote growth but influenced the production of secondary metabolites in the bulbs. The combination of microorganisms and nanoencapsulated mineral nutrients demonstrated synergistic effects, increasing dry matter, mineral content, and aquaporin gene expression. This suggests that aquaporins play a pivotal role in the transport of nutrients from leaves to storage organs, resulting in the overexpression of PIP2 aquaporins in bulbs, improved water uptake, and enhanced cell growth. Therefore, the combined treatment with microorganisms and nanoencapsulated mineral nutrients may be an optimal approach for enhancing onion productivity by regulating aquaporins under field conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanoencapsulated foliar nutrients improved nutrient penetration and mobilization more than free fertilizers.

Taxon
Allium cepa L.Allium cepat0
Treatment
foliar application of nutrients in a nanoencapsulated forme0
Outcome
nutrient penetration, mobilizatione0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
free-form fertilizerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of nutrients in a nanoencapsulated form significantly enhanced nutrient penetration, mobilization, and overall plant growth to a greater extent than free-form fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–693 · show in text ↑
t0

“Combined Soil Microorganism Amendments and Foliar Micronutrient Nanofertilization Increased the Production of Allium cepa L. through Aquaporin Gene Regulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–158 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanoencapsulated nutrients enhanced overall growth versus free fertilizers.

Taxon
Allium cepa L.Allium cepat0
Treatment
foliar application of nutrients in a nanoencapsulated forme0
Outcome
overall plant growthe0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
free-form fertilizerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of nutrients in a nanoencapsulated form significantly enhanced nutrient penetration, mobilization, and overall plant growth to a greater extent than free-form fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–693 · show in text ↑
t0

“Combined Soil Microorganism Amendments and Foliar Micronutrient Nanofertilization Increased the Production of Allium cepa L. through Aquaporin Gene Regulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–158 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial amendments alone did not promote growth.

Taxon
Allium cepa L.Allium cepat0
Treatment
Amendments with microorganisms alonee0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
did not promotee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Amendments with microorganisms alone did not promote growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–754 · show in text ↑
t0

“Combined Soil Microorganism Amendments and Foliar Micronutrient Nanofertilization Increased the Production of Allium cepa L. through Aquaporin Gene Regulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–158 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial amendments alone influenced bulb secondary metabolites.

Taxon
Allium cepa L.Allium cepat0
Organ / stage
bulbse0
Treatment
Amendments with microorganisms alonee0
Outcome
production of secondary metabolitese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Amendments with microorganisms alone did not promote growth but influenced the production of secondary metabolites in the bulbs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–822 · show in text ↑
t0

“Combined Soil Microorganism Amendments and Foliar Micronutrient Nanofertilization Increased the Production of Allium cepa L. through Aquaporin Gene Regulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–158 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined microorganisms and nanonutrients increased dry matter and mineral content.

Taxon
Allium cepa L.Allium cepat0
Treatment
combination of microorganisms and nanoencapsulated mineral nutrientse0
Outcome
dry matter, mineral contente0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combination of microorganisms and nanoencapsulated mineral nutrients demonstrated synergistic effects, increasing dry matter, mineral content, and aquaporin gene expression”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–1000 · show in text ↑
t0

“Combined Soil Microorganism Amendments and Foliar Micronutrient Nanofertilization Increased the Production of Allium cepa L. through Aquaporin Gene Regulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–158 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined microorganisms and nanonutrients increased aquaporin gene expression.

Taxon
Allium cepa L.Allium cepat0
Treatment
combination of microorganisms and nanoencapsulated mineral nutrientse0
Outcome
aquaporin gene expressione0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combination of microorganisms and nanoencapsulated mineral nutrients demonstrated synergistic effects, increasing dry matter, mineral content, and aquaporin gene expression”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–1000 · show in text ↑
t0

“Combined Soil Microorganism Amendments and Foliar Micronutrient Nanofertilization Increased the Production of Allium cepa L. through Aquaporin Gene Regulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–158 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors inferred aquaporins transport nutrients from leaves to storage organs.

Taxon
Allium cepa L.Allium cepat0
Gene
aquaporinse0
Outcome
transport of nutrients from leaves to storage organse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“aquaporins play a pivotal role in the transport of nutrients from leaves to storage organs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1111 · show in text ↑
t0

“Combined Soil Microorganism Amendments and Foliar Micronutrient Nanofertilization Increased the Production of Allium cepa L. through Aquaporin Gene Regulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–158 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment was associated with PIP2 overexpression in bulbs.

Taxon
Allium cepa L.Allium cepat0
Organ / stage
bulbse0
Gene
PIP2e0
Outcome
overexpressione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“overexpression of PIP2 aquaporins in bulbs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1172 · show in text ↑
t0

“Combined Soil Microorganism Amendments and Foliar Micronutrient Nanofertilization Increased the Production of Allium cepa L. through Aquaporin Gene Regulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–158 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment improved water uptake and cell growth.

Taxon
Allium cepa L.Allium cepat0
Treatment
Soil Microorganism Amendments and Foliar Micronutrient Nanofertilizationt0
Outcome
water uptakee0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“improved water uptake, and enhanced cell growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1221 · show in text ↑
t0

“Combined Soil Microorganism Amendments and Foliar Micronutrient Nanofertilization Increased the Production of Allium cepa L. through Aquaporin Gene Regulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–158 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend combined microbial and nanonutrient treatment for onion productivity in field conditions.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Outcome
combined treatment with microorganisms and nanoencapsulated mineral nutrientse0
Setting
field conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combined treatment with microorganisms and nanoencapsulated mineral nutrients may be an optimal approach for enhancing onion productivity by regulating aquaporins under field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1234–1423 · show in text ↑

inoculation · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

99 papers: 89 positive, 10 negative or no effect

88 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

95 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 13 positive, 2 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 28 positive, 2 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

other · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 33 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

application · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

74 papers: 70 positive, 4 negative or no effect

69 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

70 papers more in this group

See all 74 papers →

inoculation · physiology: water · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

other · physiology: water · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

application · physiology: water · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.