Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Microbial amendments alone did not promote growth.

A claim from Combined Soil Microorganism Amendments and Foliar Micronutrient Nanofertilization Increased the Production of Allium cepa L. through Aquaporin Gene Regulation · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial amendments alone did not promote growth.

Taxon
Allium cepa L.Allium cepat0
Treatment
Amendments with microorganisms alonee0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
did not promotee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Amendments with microorganisms alone did not promote growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–754
t0

“Combined Soil Microorganism Amendments and Foliar Micronutrient Nanofertilization Increased the Production of Allium cepa L. through Aquaporin Gene Regulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–158

Title

Combined Soil Microorganism Amendments and Foliar Micronutrient Nanofertilization Increased the Production of Allium cepa L. through Aquaporin Gene Regulation

José A. Berna-Sicilia; Mercy Quizhpe-Romero; María Hurtado-Navarro; et al. Life 2023. doi:10.3390/life14010004

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-7e40b0c9efccae2a91fd11692afc29f56ccf118ce491bc697950719c03799968 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

inoculation · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

99 papers: 89 positive, 10 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this claim · 88 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

90 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

other · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 33 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.