Paper · 2025 · International Journal of Agriculture and Biology

OCASE® Biostimulant and NPK Fertilizer Synergies Enhance Growth, Yield, Shelf-life, and Profitability of Onion (Allium cepa) in Senegal

Andre A Diatta; Pape A Diouf; Ahmadou B Ndiaye; et al.

7
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Sustainable agriculture focuses on reducing the excessive use of inorganic fertilizers while sustaining crop productivity and improving profitability.In Senegal, onion is an important cash crop and widely grown in the Senegal River Valley and the Niayes agroecological zones.However, its production depends on the intensive use of chemical fertilizers, which has negative effects on soil health and environment.This study assessed the effects of the single or combined application of OCASE biostimulant, made from nettle (Urtica dioica) and dandelion (Taraxacum officinale), with decreased rates of NPK on onion growth, yield, shelf-life and economic profitability under field conditions.The experiment was laid out in a randomized complete block design with four replications and six fertilization treatments: control, recommended rate of NPK fertilizer (10-10-20 -300 kg/ha), OCASE biostimulant (10 L/ha) and its combination with 75%, 50% and 25% of the recommended of NPK rate.Results showed that OCASE + 25% NPK significantly enhanced bulb weight (377.5 g), plant height (58.15 cm), and overall yield (67.89 t/ha), which were greater than the recommended rate of NPK.This treatment combination also improved postharvest storability with a decreased water loss and disease incidence compared with the NPK fertilizer alone.The highest economic gain (USD26301.28),profit (USD25891.03),and value: cost ratio (64.11) was also achieved with OCASE biostimulant + 25% NPK, demonstrating its profitability.In crux, application of OCASE biostimulant with 25% of the recommended dose of NPK could be a sustainable alternative to synthetic fertilizers for improving onion productivity, postharvest losses and environmental sustainability in Senegal.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

OCASE + 25% NPK significantly enhanced onion bulb weight relative to the recommended NPK rate under field conditions.

Taxon
Onion (Allium cepa)Allium cepat1
Organ / stage
bulbe1
Treatment
OCASE + 25% NPKe1
Outcome
bulb weighte1
Direction
enhancede1
Value
377.5 ge1
Comparator
recommended rate of NPKe1
Setting
field conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–687 · show in text ↑
e1

“OCASE + 25% NPK significantly enhanced bulb weight (377.5 g), plant height (58.15 cm), and overall yield (67.89 t/ha), which were greater than the recommended rate of NPK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1170 · show in text ↑
t1

“Onion (Allium cepa) in Senegal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

OCASE + 25% NPK significantly enhanced onion plant height relative to the recommended NPK rate under field conditions.

Taxon
Onion (Allium cepa)Allium cepat1
Treatment
OCASE + 25% NPKe1
Outcome
plant heighte1
Direction
enhancede1
Value
58.15 cme1
Comparator
recommended rate of NPKe1
Setting
field conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–687 · show in text ↑
e1

“OCASE + 25% NPK significantly enhanced bulb weight (377.5 g), plant height (58.15 cm), and overall yield (67.89 t/ha), which were greater than the recommended rate of NPK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1170 · show in text ↑
t1

“Onion (Allium cepa) in Senegal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

OCASE + 25% NPK significantly enhanced overall onion yield relative to the recommended NPK rate under field conditions.

Taxon
Onion (Allium cepa)Allium cepat1
Treatment
OCASE + 25% NPKe1
Outcome
overall yielde1
Direction
enhancede1
Value
67.89 t/hae1
Comparator
recommended rate of NPKe1
Setting
field conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–687 · show in text ↑
e1

“OCASE + 25% NPK significantly enhanced bulb weight (377.5 g), plant height (58.15 cm), and overall yield (67.89 t/ha), which were greater than the recommended rate of NPK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1170 · show in text ↑
t1

“Onion (Allium cepa) in Senegal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

OCASE + 25% NPK decreased onion water loss and disease incidence in storage compared with NPK fertilizer alone.

Taxon
Onion (Allium cepa)Allium cepat1
Treatment
OCASE biostimulant with 25% of the recommended dose of NPKe2
Outcome
water loss and disease incidencee3
Direction
decreasede3
Comparator
NPK fertilizer alonee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“application of OCASE biostimulant with 25% of the recommended dose of NPK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1510–1583 · show in text ↑
e3

“This treatment combination also improved postharvest storability with a decreased water loss and disease incidence compared with the NPK fertilizer alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1171–1324 · show in text ↑
t1

“Onion (Allium cepa) in Senegal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

OCASE biostimulant + 25% NPK gave the highest economic gain in the onion trial.

Taxon
Onion (Allium cepa)Allium cepat1
Treatment
OCASE biostimulant + 25% NPKe4
Outcome
economic gaine4
Direction
higheste4
Value
USD26301.28e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The highest economic gain (USD26301.28),profit (USD25891.03),and value: cost ratio (64.11) was also achieved with OCASE biostimulant + 25% NPK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1325–1467 · show in text ↑
t1

“Onion (Allium cepa) in Senegal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

OCASE biostimulant + 25% NPK gave the highest profit in the onion trial.

Taxon
Onion (Allium cepa)Allium cepat1
Treatment
OCASE biostimulant + 25% NPKe4
Outcome
profite4
Direction
higheste4
Value
USD25891.03e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The highest economic gain (USD26301.28),profit (USD25891.03),and value: cost ratio (64.11) was also achieved with OCASE biostimulant + 25% NPK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1325–1467 · show in text ↑
t1

“Onion (Allium cepa) in Senegal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

OCASE biostimulant + 25% NPK gave the highest value: cost ratio in the onion trial.

Taxon
Onion (Allium cepa)Allium cepat1
Treatment
OCASE biostimulant + 25% NPKe4
Outcome
value: cost ratioe4
Direction
higheste4
Value
64.11e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The highest economic gain (USD26301.28),profit (USD25891.03),and value: cost ratio (64.11) was also achieved with OCASE biostimulant + 25% NPK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1325–1467 · show in text ↑
t1

“Onion (Allium cepa) in Senegal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–135 · show in text ↑

other · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 44 positive, 4 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

fertilization · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

294 papers: 251 positive, 43 negative or no effect

250 papers in the same direction as this paper · 40 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

290 papers more in this group

See all 294 papers →

fertilization · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

530 papers: 464 positive, 66 negative or no effect

463 papers in the same direction as this paper · 59 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

526 papers more in this group

See all 530 papers →

other · physiology: water · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

fertilization · physiology: water · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.