Paper · 2025 · Nitrogen

Impact of Nitrogen Fertilization on Rosemary: Assessment of Physiological Traits, Vegetation Indices, and Environmental Resource Use Efficiency

Christos A. Dordas

11
claims
27
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Rosemary (Salvia rosmarinus L.) is a versatile and resilient plant with significant culinary, medicinal, and ecological value. This study evaluates the impact of four nitrogen (N) fertilization levels (0, 50, 100, and 150 kg N ha⁻¹) on the morphological, physiological, and agronomic traits, as well as vegetative indices, of rosemary over two growing seasons (2022 and 2023). The results indicate that plant height and leaf area index (LAI) increased with N application. Additionally, physiological characteristics such as chlorophyll content, photosynthetic efficiency, and assimilation rates (A) increased by an average of 32%, 17%, and 55%, respectively, compared to the control. Biomass production also improved with N fertilization, with yields rising by 32% in 2022 and 58% in 2023. Furthermore, both essential oil concentration and essential oil yield were enhanced by N application. Radiation use efficiency (RUE), water use efficiency (WUE), agronomic efficiency (AE), and partial factor productivity (PFP) also increased, indicating more efficient utilization of environmental resources. Moreover, higher N rates consistently enhanced vegetation indices, reflecting improved plant health, greenness, biomass, photosynthetic activity, and energy utilization. Therefore, this study highlights that the optimal N range appears to balance biomass yield and essential oil yield while maximizing the efficiency of environmental resource use.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height and leaf area index increased with N application.

Taxon
RosemarySalvia rosmarinuse1
Treatment
N applicatione0
Outcome
plant height and leaf area index (LAI)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salvia rosmarinus
Salvia rosmarinus · TaxonMargalob · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant height and leaf area index (LAI) increased with N application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 403–470 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rosemary (Salvia rosmarinus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll content increased by an average of 32% compared with the control with N fertilization.

Taxon
RosemarySalvia rosmarinuse1
Treatment
nitrogen (N) fertilization levelse2
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
32%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salvia rosmarinus
Salvia rosmarinus · TaxonMargalob · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chlorophyll content, photosynthetic efficiency, and assimilation rates (A) increased by an average of 32%, 17%, and 55%, respectively, compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–682 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rosemary (Salvia rosmarinus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–31 · show in text ↑
e2

“four nitrogen (N) fertilization levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–200 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthetic efficiency increased by an average of 17% compared with the control with N fertilization.

Taxon
RosemarySalvia rosmarinuse1
Treatment
nitrogen (N) fertilization levelse2
Outcome
photosynthetic efficiencye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
17%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salvia rosmarinus
Salvia rosmarinus · TaxonMargalob · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chlorophyll content, photosynthetic efficiency, and assimilation rates (A) increased by an average of 32%, 17%, and 55%, respectively, compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–682 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rosemary (Salvia rosmarinus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–31 · show in text ↑
e2

“four nitrogen (N) fertilization levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–200 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Assimilation rates increased by an average of 55% compared with the control with N fertilization.

Taxon
RosemarySalvia rosmarinuse1
Treatment
nitrogen (N) fertilization levelse2
Outcome
assimilation rates (A)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
55%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salvia rosmarinus
Salvia rosmarinus · TaxonMargalob · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chlorophyll content, photosynthetic efficiency, and assimilation rates (A) increased by an average of 32%, 17%, and 55%, respectively, compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–682 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rosemary (Salvia rosmarinus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–31 · show in text ↑
e2

“four nitrogen (N) fertilization levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–200 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biomass production rose by 32% in 2022 with N fertilization.

Taxon
RosemarySalvia rosmarinuse1
Treatment
N fertilizatione0
Outcome
Biomass productione0
Direction
risinge0
Value
32%e0
Qualifier
2022e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salvia rosmarinus
Salvia rosmarinus · TaxonMargalob · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biomass production also improved with N fertilization, with yields rising by 32% in 2022 and 58% in 2023”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–788 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rosemary (Salvia rosmarinus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biomass production rose by 58% in 2023 with N fertilization.

Taxon
RosemarySalvia rosmarinuse1
Treatment
N fertilizatione0
Outcome
Biomass productione0
Direction
risinge0
Value
58%e0
Qualifier
2023e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salvia rosmarinus
Salvia rosmarinus · TaxonMargalob · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biomass production also improved with N fertilization, with yields rising by 32% in 2022 and 58% in 2023”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–788 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rosemary (Salvia rosmarinus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Essential oil concentration and essential oil yield were enhanced by N application.

Taxon
RosemarySalvia rosmarinuse1
Treatment
N applicatione0
Outcome
essential oil concentration and essential oil yielde0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salvia rosmarinus
Salvia rosmarinus · TaxonMargalob · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both essential oil concentration and essential oil yield were enhanced by N application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–890 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rosemary (Salvia rosmarinus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Radiation use efficiency and water use efficiency increased with N fertilization.

Taxon
RosemarySalvia rosmarinuse1
Treatment
nitrogen (N) fertilization levelse2
Outcome
Radiation use efficiency (RUE), water use efficiency (WUE)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salvia rosmarinus
Salvia rosmarinus · TaxonMargalob · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Radiation use efficiency (RUE), water use efficiency (WUE), agronomic efficiency (AE), and partial factor productivity (PFP) also increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1031 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rosemary (Salvia rosmarinus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–31 · show in text ↑
e2

“four nitrogen (N) fertilization levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–200 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Agronomic efficiency and partial factor productivity increased with N fertilization.

Taxon
RosemarySalvia rosmarinuse1
Treatment
nitrogen (N) fertilization levelse2
Outcome
agronomic efficiency (AE), and partial factor productivity (PFP)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salvia rosmarinus
Salvia rosmarinus · TaxonMargalob · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Radiation use efficiency (RUE), water use efficiency (WUE), agronomic efficiency (AE), and partial factor productivity (PFP) also increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1031 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rosemary (Salvia rosmarinus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–31 · show in text ↑
e2

“four nitrogen (N) fertilization levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–200 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher N rates consistently enhanced vegetation indices.

Taxon
RosemarySalvia rosmarinuse1
Treatment
higher N ratese0
Outcome
vegetation indicese0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salvia rosmarinus
Salvia rosmarinus · TaxonMargalob · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher N rates consistently enhanced vegetation indices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1164 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rosemary (Salvia rosmarinus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–31 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude the optimal N range balances biomass yield and essential oil yield while maximizing environmental resource use efficiency.

Taxon
RosemarySalvia rosmarinuse1
Outcome
optimal N rangee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salvia rosmarinus
Salvia rosmarinus · TaxonMargalob · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the optimal N range appears to balance biomass yield and essential oil yield while maximizing the efficiency of environmental resource use”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1307–1445 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rosemary (Salvia rosmarinus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–31 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: oil · Salvia rosmarinus (rosemary)Results differ

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fertilization · growth · Salvia rosmarinus (rosemary)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 19 positive, 3 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

nitrogen · physiology: pigments · Salvia rosmarinus (rosemary)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · physiology: photosynthesis · Salvia rosmarinus (rosemary)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Salvia rosmarinus (rosemary)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Salvia rosmarinus (rosemary)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

fertilization · yield · Salvia rosmarinus (rosemary)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.