Paper · 2025 · Scientific Reports

Synergistic effects of magnetic water treatment and mulching on crop and soil moisture-salinity distribution

Ahmed Abdelfattah; Montaser Awad; Omnia Sorour

10
claims
17
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Freshwater scarcity has increased the reliance on low quality water for irrigation purposes. Brackish and/or high salinity irrigation water may increase soil salinity and reduce yields. This study was carried out for two consecutive seasons to study the effect of magnetic treatment of brackish water and soil mulching on strawberry growth and productivity and soil moisture-salinity distribution. For this purpose, three irrigation water types were used: tap water (W 1 ), brackish water (W 2 ), and magnetically treated brackish water (W 3 ). Four different soil mulches were evaluated: rice straw mulch applied at rate of 3 t ha −1 (M 1 ), rice straw mulch applied at rate of 5 t ha −1 (M 2 ), white polyethylene plastic mulch (M 3 ), and black polyethylene plastic mulch (M 4 ) compared to bare soil (M 0 ). The results revealed that magnetic water treatment (MWT) and soil mulching significantly enhanced crop growth and productivity and improved soil moisture-salinity distribution. The difference between M 2 and M 4 was not statistically significant in almost all the studied traits in both growing seasons. This result highlights the potential of using rice straw as a sustainable alternative to plastic mulch in strawberry cultivation. Strawberry marketable yield and water productivity increased significantly by 26.7% and 18.6% over the two growing seasons as a result of MWT, compared to untreated water. Moreover, MWT had a positive effect on reducing soil salinization. MWT led to a significant decrease in soil salinity by 17.8% compared to untreated water (W 2 ) and the difference in soil salinity between W 1 and W 3 was not statistically significant. The integration of MWT and straw mulch at 5 t ha −1 (W 3 M 2 ) has resulted in marketable yield increase of 32.6 and 40.9% compared to brackish water irrigation and bare soil conditions (W 2 M 0 ). Hence W 3 M 2 could be adopted as a sustainable management practice for safe use of brackish irrigation water in strawberry cultivation

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Magnetic water treatment and soil mulching significantly enhanced strawberry crop growth and productivity.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae1
Treatment
magnetic water treatment (MWT) and soil mulchinge0
Outcome
crop growth and productivitye0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results revealed that magnetic water treatment (MWT) and soil mulching significantly enhanced crop growth and productivity and improved soil moisture-salinity distribution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–996 · show in text ↑
e1

“on strawberry growth and productivity and soil moisture-salinity distribution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 328–405 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Magnetic water treatment and soil mulching significantly improved the soil moisture-salinity distribution under strawberry.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae1
Treatment
magnetic water treatment (MWT) and soil mulchinge0
Outcome
soil moisture-salinity distributione0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results revealed that magnetic water treatment (MWT) and soil mulching significantly enhanced crop growth and productivity and improved soil moisture-salinity distribution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–996 · show in text ↑
e1

“on strawberry growth and productivity and soil moisture-salinity distribution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 328–405 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice straw mulch at 5 t ha −1 did not differ significantly from black polyethylene mulch in almost all studied strawberry traits in both seasons.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae1
Treatment
rice straw mulch applied at rate of 5 t ha −1 (M 2 )e3
Outcome
studied traitse2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2
Comparator
black polyethylene plastic mulch (M 4 )e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“on strawberry growth and productivity and soil moisture-salinity distribution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 328–405 · show in text ↑
e2

“The difference between M 2 and M 4 was not statistically significant in almost all the studied traits in both growing seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1123 · show in text ↑
e3

“rice straw mulch applied at rate of 5 t ha −1 (M 2 ), white polyethylene plastic mulch (M 3 ), and black polyethylene plastic mulch (M 4 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–790 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Magnetic water treatment increased strawberry marketable yield by 26.7% over two seasons compared with untreated water.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassae4
Treatment
MWTe4
Outcome
marketable yielde4
Direction
increasede4
Value
26.7%e4
Comparator
untreated watere4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Strawberry marketable yield and water productivity increased significantly by 26.7% and 18.6% over the two growing seasons as a result of MWT, compared to untreated water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1425 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Magnetic water treatment increased strawberry water productivity by 18.6% over two seasons compared with untreated water.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassae4
Treatment
MWTe4
Outcome
water productivitye4
Direction
increasede4
Value
18.6%e4
Comparator
untreated watere4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Strawberry marketable yield and water productivity increased significantly by 26.7% and 18.6% over the two growing seasons as a result of MWT, compared to untreated water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1425 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Magnetic water treatment significantly decreased soil salinity by 17.8% compared with untreated brackish water under strawberry.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae1
Treatment
MWTe5
Outcome
soil salinitye5
Direction
decreasee5
Value
17.8%e5
Comparator
untreated water (W 2 )e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“on strawberry growth and productivity and soil moisture-salinity distribution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 328–405 · show in text ↑
e5

“MWT led to a significant decrease in soil salinity by 17.8% compared to untreated water (W 2 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1494–1588 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integration of magnetic water treatment and straw mulch increased strawberry marketable yield compared with brackish water irrigation (32.6%).

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae1
Treatment
integration of MWT and straw mulche6
Outcome
marketable yielde6
Direction
increasee6
Value
32.6e6
Comparator
brackish water irrigatione6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“on strawberry growth and productivity and soil moisture-salinity distribution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 328–405 · show in text ↑
e6

“The integration of MWT and straw mulch at 5 t ha −1 (W 3 M 2 ) has resulted in marketable yield increase of 32.6 and 40.9% compared to brackish water irrigation and bare soil conditions (W 2 M 0 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1680–1876 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integration of magnetic water treatment and straw mulch increased strawberry marketable yield compared with bare soil (40.9%).

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae1
Treatment
integration of MWT and straw mulche6
Outcome
marketable yielde6
Direction
increasee6
Value
40.9%e6
Comparator
bare soil conditionse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“on strawberry growth and productivity and soil moisture-salinity distribution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 328–405 · show in text ↑
e6

“The integration of MWT and straw mulch at 5 t ha −1 (W 3 M 2 ) has resulted in marketable yield increase of 32.6 and 40.9% compared to brackish water irrigation and bare soil conditions (W 2 M 0 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1680–1876 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Magnetic treatment of brackish water with straw mulch at 5 t ha −1 could be adopted as a sustainable practice for safe use of brackish irrigation water in strawberry cultivation.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae7
Outcome
sustainable management practice for safe use of brackish irrigation watere7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“W 3 M 2 could be adopted as a sustainable management practice for safe use of brackish irrigation water in strawberry cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1884–2013 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Rice straw is a sustainable alternative to plastic mulch in strawberry cultivation.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Outcome
using rice straw as a sustainable alternative to plastic mulche0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This result highlights the potential of using rice straw as a sustainable alternative to plastic mulch in strawberry cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1253 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results differ

65 papers: 40 positive, 25 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

mulching · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results differ

97 papers: 78 positive, 19 negative or no effect

77 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

93 papers more in this group

See all 97 papers →

irrigation · soil: chemistry · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

irrigation · quality: postharvest · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

irrigation · soil: physics · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

mulching · soil: physics · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.