Paper · 2025 · Journal of Environmental Biology

Metribuzin-based herbicide combination for management of dominant weed flora to enhance wheat productivity and profitability under Indo-Gangetic plains

I. Ahlawat; B.R. Kamboj; D.B. Yadav

11
claims
23
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Aim: A two-year ‘on-farm experimentation’ was conducted to estimate the efficacy of metribuzin (MTZ), applied alone and in combination with pinoxaden (PDN), at various application doses and timing for controlling diverse weed flora in rice-wheat cropping system. Methodology: The experiment was conducted over two consecutive cropping seasons, 2021–22 and 2022–23 at Rice Research Station, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Kaul (Kaithal), Haryana, India.The experiment with MTZ based herbicide combinations was planned out using factorial randomized block design for management of Phalaris minor in wheat under conventional tillage system. Results: The study results indicated that highest grain yield (6,140 and 5,804 kg ha-1 during 2021-22 and 2022-23, respectively.) and Benefit-Cost Ratio (1.96 and 1.83, respectively) was achieved with post-emergence (POE) application of MTZ at 350 g ha-1, mixed with urea and broadcasted at 35 days after sowing (DAS) in conjunction with PDN as spray at 50 g ha-1 demonstrating superior weed suppression in wheat crop. PDNat 50 g ha-1 exhibited significant control over Phalaris minor but demonstrated no effectiveness against broadleaf weeds (BLWs). Interpretation: POE application of MTZ at 350 g ha-1, broadcasted with urea and PDN at 50 g ha-1, provided highly effective control of Phalaris minor and BLWs viz. Medicago denticulata, Melilotus indica and Rumex dentatus. POE application of MTZ at 350 g ha-1 and PDN at 50 g ha-1 proved to be the most effective and economically viable strategy for weed control in conventional-till wheat. Key words: Metribuzin, Phalaris minor, Pinoxaden, Weed, Wheat

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined post-emergence treatment gave the highest wheat grain yield in 2021–22.

Treatment
post-emergence (POE) application of MTZ at 350 g ha-1, mixed with urea and broadcasted at 35 days after sowing (DAS) in conjunction with PDN as spray at 50 g ha-1e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
6,140e0
Qualifier
2021-22e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest grain yield (6,140 and 5,804 kg ha-1 during 2021-22 and 2022-23, respectively.) and Benefit-Cost Ratio (1.96 and 1.83, respectively) was achieved with post-emergence (POE) application of MTZ at 350 g ha-1, mixed with urea and broadcasted at 35 days after sowing (DAS) in conjunction with PDN as spray at 50 g ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–1007 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment gave the highest wheat grain yield in 2022–23, at 5,804 kg ha-1.

Treatment
post-emergence (POE) application of MTZ at 350 g ha-1, mixed with urea and broadcasted at 35 days after sowing (DAS) in conjunction with PDN as spray at 50 g ha-1e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
5,804 kg ha-1e0
Qualifier
2022-23e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest grain yield (6,140 and 5,804 kg ha-1 during 2021-22 and 2022-23, respectively.) and Benefit-Cost Ratio (1.96 and 1.83, respectively) was achieved with post-emergence (POE) application of MTZ at 350 g ha-1, mixed with urea and broadcasted at 35 days after sowing (DAS) in conjunction with PDN as spray at 50 g ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–1007 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment yielded a benefit-cost ratio of 1.96 in 2021–22.

Outcome
Benefit-Cost Ratioe0
Value
1.96e0
Qualifier
2021-22e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Benefit-Cost Ratio (1.96 and 1.83, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–826 · show in text ↑
e1

“during 2021-22 and 2022-23, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–772 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment yielded a benefit-cost ratio of 1.83 in 2022–23.

Outcome
Benefit-Cost Ratioe0
Value
1.83e0
Qualifier
2022-23e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Benefit-Cost Ratio (1.96 and 1.83, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–826 · show in text ↑
e1

“during 2021-22 and 2022-23, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–772 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pinoxaden at 50 g ha-1 significantly controlled Phalaris minor in wheat.

Treatment
PDNat 50 g ha-1e0
Interactor
Phalaris minorPhalaris minore0weed
Outcome
control over Phalaris minore0
Direction
controle0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PDNat 50 g ha-1 exhibited significant control over Phalaris minor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1128 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pinoxaden at 50 g ha-1 was ineffective against broadleaf weeds in wheat.

Treatment
PDNat 50 g ha-1e0
Interactor
broadleaf weedse0weed
Outcome
effectiveness against broadleaf weeds (BLWs)e0
Direction
no effectivenesse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PDNat 50 g ha-1 exhibited significant control over Phalaris minor but demonstrated no effectiveness against broadleaf weeds (BLWs)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1193 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment effectively controlled Phalaris minor in wheat.

Treatment
POE application of MTZ at 350 g ha-1, broadcasted with urea and PDN at 50 g ha-1e0
Interactor
Phalaris minorPhalaris minore0weed
Outcome
control of Phalaris minore0
Direction
highly effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“POE application of MTZ at 350 g ha-1, broadcasted with urea and PDN at 50 g ha-1, provided highly effective control of Phalaris minor and BLWs viz. Medicago denticulata, Melilotus indica and Rumex dentatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1211–1416 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment effectively controlled Medicago denticulata in wheat.

Treatment
POE application of MTZ at 350 g ha-1, broadcasted with urea and PDN at 50 g ha-1e0
Interactor
Medicago denticulatae0weed
Outcome
highly effective controle0
Direction
highly effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“POE application of MTZ at 350 g ha-1, broadcasted with urea and PDN at 50 g ha-1, provided highly effective control of Phalaris minor and BLWs viz. Medicago denticulata, Melilotus indica and Rumex dentatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1211–1416 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment effectively controlled Melilotus indica in wheat.

Treatment
POE application of MTZ at 350 g ha-1, broadcasted with urea and PDN at 50 g ha-1e0
Interactor
Melilotus indicaMelilotus indicuse0weed
Outcome
highly effective controle0
Direction
highly effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Melilotus indicus
Melilotus indicus · InteractorZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“POE application of MTZ at 350 g ha-1, broadcasted with urea and PDN at 50 g ha-1, provided highly effective control of Phalaris minor and BLWs viz. Medicago denticulata, Melilotus indica and Rumex dentatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1211–1416 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment effectively controlled Rumex dentatus in wheat.

Treatment
POE application of MTZ at 350 g ha-1, broadcasted with urea and PDN at 50 g ha-1e0
Interactor
Rumex dentatusRumex dentatuse0weed
Outcome
highly effective controle0
Direction
highly effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rumex dentatus
Rumex dentatus · InteractorDinesh Valke from Thane, India · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“POE application of MTZ at 350 g ha-1, broadcasted with urea and PDN at 50 g ha-1, provided highly effective control of Phalaris minor and BLWs viz. Medicago denticulata, Melilotus indica and Rumex dentatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1211–1416 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend the combined post-emergence treatment as the most effective and economically viable wheat weed-control strategy.

Outcome
POE application of MTZ at 350 g ha-1 and PDN at 50 g ha-1e0
Qualifier
conventional-tille0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“POE application of MTZ at 350 g ha-1 and PDN at 50 g ha-1 proved to be the most effective and economically viable strategy for weed control in conventional-till wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1418–1584 · show in text ↑

pinoxaden · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

30 papers: 26 positive, 4 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

metribuzin · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

75 papers: 45 positive, 30 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

pinoxaden · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

pinoxaden · Rumex dentatus · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

pinoxaden · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

metribuzin · Melilotus indicus · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

metribuzin · Rumex dentatus · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

metribuzin · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

8 of 19 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.