Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The combined post-emergence treatment gave the highest wheat grain yield in 2021–22.

A claim from Metribuzin-based herbicide combination for management of dominant weed flora to enhance wheat productivity and profitability under Indo-Gangetic plains · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined post-emergence treatment gave the highest wheat grain yield in 2021–22.

Treatment
post-emergence (POE) application of MTZ at 350 g ha-1, mixed with urea and broadcasted at 35 days after sowing (DAS) in conjunction with PDN as spray at 50 g ha-1e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
6,140e0
Qualifier
2021-22e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest grain yield (6,140 and 5,804 kg ha-1 during 2021-22 and 2022-23, respectively.) and Benefit-Cost Ratio (1.96 and 1.83, respectively) was achieved with post-emergence (POE) application of MTZ at 350 g ha-1, mixed with urea and broadcasted at 35 days after sowing (DAS) in conjunction with PDN as spray at 50 g ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–1007
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93

Title

Metribuzin-based herbicide combination for management of dominant weed flora to enhance wheat productivity and profitability under Indo-Gangetic plains

I. Ahlawat; B.R. Kamboj; D.B. Yadav Journal of Environmental Biology 2025. doi:10.22438/jeb/46/3/mrn-5523

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-d6558f83191d3a542e492037e72502bc8dd431d9db48b9d053a8f114d293f118 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

pinoxaden · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

30 papers: 26 positive, 4 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

metribuzin · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

75 papers: 45 positive, 30 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this claim · 27 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

66 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

transplanting · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

176 papers: 129 positive, 47 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this claim · 35 in the opposite direction · 12 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

167 papers more in this group

See all 176 papers →

3 of 6 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.