Paper · 2025 · International Journal of Research in Agronomy

Impact of integrated nitrogen management on the nutritional quality of fodder maize

Padheriya DR; Patel HK; Raval CH; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A two-year field experiment on integrated nitrogen management on fodder maize and its residual effects on succeeding fodder cowpea was conducted at Main Forage Research Station, Anand Agricultural University, Anand during rabi-summer season of 2021-22 and 2022-23 at Forage Research Farm. Experiment consists of twelve integrated nitrogen management treatments with three replications. Two-year experiments data results revealed that application of 125% RDN (100 kg N/ha) + Micronutrient enriched FYM 0.5 t/ha reported significantly higher dry matter intake (1.88 and 1.82%), dry matter digestibility (69.22 and 70.00%), total digestible nutrient (68.73 and 70.02%), relative feed value (100.49 and 98.66%) and relative feed quality (104.55 and 103.55%). While application of Micronutrient enriched FYM 0.5 t/ha fb Jeevamrut drenching 500 L/ha at 15,30 and 45 DAS reported significantly lower feed quality like dry matter intake (1.49 and 4.49%), dry matter digestibility (62.21 and 62.47%), total digestible nutrient (57.11 and 57.54%), relative feed value (71.97 and 72.09%) and relative feed quality (69.29 and 69.71%) respectively 2021-22 and 2022-23.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nitrogen management gave significantly higher dry matter intake in fodder maize.

Taxon
fodder maizet0
Treatment
125% RDN (100 kg N/ha) + Micronutrient enriched FYM 0.5 t/hae0
Outcome
dry matter intakee0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.88 and 1.82%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Two-year experiments data results revealed that application of 125% RDN (100 kg N/ha) + Micronutrient enriched FYM 0.5 t/ha reported significantly higher dry matter intake (1.88 and 1.82%), dry matter digestibility (69.22 and 70.00%), total digestible nutrient (68.73 and 70.02%), relative feed value (100.49 and 98.66%) and relative feed quality (104.55 and 103.55%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–754 · show in text ↑
t0

“fodder maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nitrogen management gave significantly higher dry matter digestibility in fodder maize.

Taxon
fodder maizet0
Treatment
125% RDN (100 kg N/ha) + Micronutrient enriched FYM 0.5 t/hae0
Outcome
dry matter digestibilitye0
Direction
highere0
Value
69.22 and 70.00%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Two-year experiments data results revealed that application of 125% RDN (100 kg N/ha) + Micronutrient enriched FYM 0.5 t/ha reported significantly higher dry matter intake (1.88 and 1.82%), dry matter digestibility (69.22 and 70.00%), total digestible nutrient (68.73 and 70.02%), relative feed value (100.49 and 98.66%) and relative feed quality (104.55 and 103.55%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–754 · show in text ↑
t0

“fodder maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nitrogen management gave significantly higher total digestible nutrient in fodder maize.

Taxon
fodder maizet0
Treatment
125% RDN (100 kg N/ha) + Micronutrient enriched FYM 0.5 t/hae0
Outcome
total digestible nutriente0
Direction
highere0
Value
68.73 and 70.02%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Two-year experiments data results revealed that application of 125% RDN (100 kg N/ha) + Micronutrient enriched FYM 0.5 t/ha reported significantly higher dry matter intake (1.88 and 1.82%), dry matter digestibility (69.22 and 70.00%), total digestible nutrient (68.73 and 70.02%), relative feed value (100.49 and 98.66%) and relative feed quality (104.55 and 103.55%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–754 · show in text ↑
t0

“fodder maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nitrogen management gave significantly higher relative feed value in fodder maize.

Taxon
fodder maizet0
Treatment
125% RDN (100 kg N/ha) + Micronutrient enriched FYM 0.5 t/hae0
Outcome
relative feed valuee0
Direction
highere0
Value
100.49 and 98.66%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Two-year experiments data results revealed that application of 125% RDN (100 kg N/ha) + Micronutrient enriched FYM 0.5 t/ha reported significantly higher dry matter intake (1.88 and 1.82%), dry matter digestibility (69.22 and 70.00%), total digestible nutrient (68.73 and 70.02%), relative feed value (100.49 and 98.66%) and relative feed quality (104.55 and 103.55%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–754 · show in text ↑
t0

“fodder maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nitrogen management gave significantly higher relative feed quality in fodder maize.

Taxon
fodder maizet0
Treatment
125% RDN (100 kg N/ha) + Micronutrient enriched FYM 0.5 t/hae0
Outcome
relative feed qualitye0
Direction
highere0
Value
104.55 and 103.55%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Two-year experiments data results revealed that application of 125% RDN (100 kg N/ha) + Micronutrient enriched FYM 0.5 t/ha reported significantly higher dry matter intake (1.88 and 1.82%), dry matter digestibility (69.22 and 70.00%), total digestible nutrient (68.73 and 70.02%), relative feed value (100.49 and 98.66%) and relative feed quality (104.55 and 103.55%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–754 · show in text ↑
t0

“fodder maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronutrient enriched FYM with Jeevamrut gave significantly lower dry matter intake in fodder maize.

Taxon
fodder maizet0
Treatment
Micronutrient enriched FYM 0.5 t/ha fb Jeevamrut drenching 500 L/ha at 15,30 and 45 DASe0
Outcome
dry matter intakee0
Direction
lowere0
Value
1.49 and 4.49%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“While application of Micronutrient enriched FYM 0.5 t/ha fb Jeevamrut drenching 500 L/ha at 15,30 and 45 DAS reported significantly lower feed quality like dry matter intake (1.49 and 4.49%), dry matter digestibility (62.21 and 62.47%), total digestible nutrient (57.11 and 57.54%), relative feed value (71.97 and 72.09%) and relative feed quality (69.29 and 69.71%) respectively 2021-22 and 2022-23.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–1155 · show in text ↑
t0

“fodder maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronutrient enriched FYM with Jeevamrut gave significantly lower dry matter digestibility in fodder maize.

Taxon
fodder maizet0
Treatment
Micronutrient enriched FYM 0.5 t/ha fb Jeevamrut drenching 500 L/ha at 15,30 and 45 DASe0
Outcome
dry matter digestibilitye0
Direction
lowere0
Value
62.21 and 62.47%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“While application of Micronutrient enriched FYM 0.5 t/ha fb Jeevamrut drenching 500 L/ha at 15,30 and 45 DAS reported significantly lower feed quality like dry matter intake (1.49 and 4.49%), dry matter digestibility (62.21 and 62.47%), total digestible nutrient (57.11 and 57.54%), relative feed value (71.97 and 72.09%) and relative feed quality (69.29 and 69.71%) respectively 2021-22 and 2022-23.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–1155 · show in text ↑
t0

“fodder maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronutrient enriched FYM with Jeevamrut gave significantly lower total digestible nutrient in fodder maize.

Taxon
fodder maizet0
Treatment
Micronutrient enriched FYM 0.5 t/ha fb Jeevamrut drenching 500 L/ha at 15,30 and 45 DASe0
Outcome
total digestible nutriente0
Direction
lowere0
Value
57.11 and 57.54%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“While application of Micronutrient enriched FYM 0.5 t/ha fb Jeevamrut drenching 500 L/ha at 15,30 and 45 DAS reported significantly lower feed quality like dry matter intake (1.49 and 4.49%), dry matter digestibility (62.21 and 62.47%), total digestible nutrient (57.11 and 57.54%), relative feed value (71.97 and 72.09%) and relative feed quality (69.29 and 69.71%) respectively 2021-22 and 2022-23.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–1155 · show in text ↑
t0

“fodder maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronutrient enriched FYM with Jeevamrut gave significantly lower relative feed value in fodder maize.

Taxon
fodder maizet0
Treatment
Micronutrient enriched FYM 0.5 t/ha fb Jeevamrut drenching 500 L/ha at 15,30 and 45 DASe0
Outcome
relative feed valuee0
Direction
lowere0
Value
71.97 and 72.09%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“While application of Micronutrient enriched FYM 0.5 t/ha fb Jeevamrut drenching 500 L/ha at 15,30 and 45 DAS reported significantly lower feed quality like dry matter intake (1.49 and 4.49%), dry matter digestibility (62.21 and 62.47%), total digestible nutrient (57.11 and 57.54%), relative feed value (71.97 and 72.09%) and relative feed quality (69.29 and 69.71%) respectively 2021-22 and 2022-23.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–1155 · show in text ↑
t0

“fodder maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronutrient enriched FYM with Jeevamrut gave significantly lower relative feed quality in fodder maize.

Taxon
fodder maizet0
Treatment
Micronutrient enriched FYM 0.5 t/ha fb Jeevamrut drenching 500 L/ha at 15,30 and 45 DASe0
Outcome
relative feed qualitye0
Direction
lowere0
Value
69.29 and 69.71%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“While application of Micronutrient enriched FYM 0.5 t/ha fb Jeevamrut drenching 500 L/ha at 15,30 and 45 DAS reported significantly lower feed quality like dry matter intake (1.49 and 4.49%), dry matter digestibility (62.21 and 62.47%), total digestible nutrient (57.11 and 57.54%), relative feed value (71.97 and 72.09%) and relative feed quality (69.29 and 69.71%) respectively 2021-22 and 2022-23.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–1155 · show in text ↑
t0

“fodder maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–83 · show in text ↑

micronutrient · quality: grain · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

micronutrient · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

micronutrient · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 20 positive, 3 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

application · quality: grain · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 24 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

nitrogen · quality: grain · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

72 papers: 59 positive, 13 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

68 papers more in this group

See all 72 papers →

fertilization · quality: grain · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

106 papers: 89 positive, 17 negative or no effect

88 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

102 papers more in this group

See all 106 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

161 papers: 151 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 151 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

157 papers more in this group

See all 161 papers →

application · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

337 papers: 310 positive, 27 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 310 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

333 papers more in this group

See all 337 papers →

8 of 12 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.