Paper · 2025 · Frontiers in Genetics

Effects of salinity stress on morphological structure, physiology, and mRNA expression in different wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars

Xiaohui Sun; Yuliu Tan; Yumei Zhang; et al.

8
claims
18
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Salinity is a major abiotic stress that threatens crop yield and food supply in saline soil areas. Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) is the most important cereal crop in arid and semiarid land areas, which are often adversely affected by soil salinity. Hence, creating salt tolerance wheat is of great value for utilizing saline soils. In this study, two wheat cultivars QingMai 6 (QM6, salt-tolerant) and Chinese Spring (CS, salt-sensitive) were subjected to salinity stress. Morphological analysis showed that the seedlings of QM6 grew better than CS under salt stress conditions, especially in roots. Electron microscopic studies revealed that salinity stress caused significantly more root hairs and less effect on normal chloroplast structure in QM6 than these in CS. Moreover, QM6 showed a higher photosynthetic activity under salt stress conditions compared to CS. Further investigation showed the salt-tolerant phenotypes of QM6 were accompanied by decreases of reactive oxygen species (ROS) content, and lower antioxidant enzyme activities after salt treatment compared with CS. Additionally, qRT-PCR analyses revealed that the expression level of ROS-scavenging genes ( TaSOD6 , TaCAT1/5/6 , TaPOD7, TaP5CS1 ) and stress-responsive genes ( TaDREB3 , TaWRKY19 , TaERF5a, TaLTP1, TaTIP2 ) displayed more transcripts in QM6 than CS. These results provide insight into the mechanisms underlying salt tolerance in wheat, and could be potentially used to develop salt tolerant wheat varieties.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

QM6 seedlings grew better than Chinese Spring under salt stress, especially in roots.

Material
QM6e0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
salt stress conditionse0
Outcome
seedlings of QM6 grew bettere0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
CSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the seedlings of QM6 grew better than CS under salt stress conditions, especially in roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 508–598 · show in text ↑
e1

“two wheat cultivars QingMai 6 (QM6, salt-tolerant) and Chinese Spring (CS, salt-sensitive)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 347–437 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity stress caused significantly more root hairs in QM6 than CS.

Material
QM6e0
Treatment
salinity stresse0
Outcome
root hairse0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
CSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“salinity stress caused significantly more root hairs and less effect on normal chloroplast structure in QM6 than these in CS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–767 · show in text ↑
e1

“two wheat cultivars QingMai 6 (QM6, salt-tolerant) and Chinese Spring (CS, salt-sensitive)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 347–437 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity stress affected normal chloroplast structure less in QM6 than CS.

Material
QM6e0
Treatment
salinity stresse0
Outcome
normal chloroplast structuree0
Direction
less effecte0
Comparator
CSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“salinity stress caused significantly more root hairs and less effect on normal chloroplast structure in QM6 than these in CS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–767 · show in text ↑
e1

“two wheat cultivars QingMai 6 (QM6, salt-tolerant) and Chinese Spring (CS, salt-sensitive)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 347–437 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

QM6 had higher photosynthetic activity than CS under salt stress.

Material
QM6e0
Treatment
salt stress conditionse0
Outcome
photosynthetic activitye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
CSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“QM6 showed a higher photosynthetic activity under salt stress conditions compared to CS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–866 · show in text ↑
e1

“two wheat cultivars QingMai 6 (QM6, salt-tolerant) and Chinese Spring (CS, salt-sensitive)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 347–437 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

QM6 had lower reactive oxygen species content than CS after salt treatment.

Material
QM6e1
Treatment
salt treatmente0
Outcome
reactive oxygen species (ROS) contente0
Direction
decreasese0
Comparator
CSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decreases of reactive oxygen species (ROS) content, and lower antioxidant enzyme activities after salt treatment compared with CS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1082 · show in text ↑
e1

“salt-tolerant phenotypes of QM6”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–932 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–128 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

QM6 had lower antioxidant enzyme activities than CS after salt treatment.

Material
QM6e1
Treatment
salt treatmente0
Outcome
antioxidant enzyme activitiese0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
CSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lower antioxidant enzyme activities after salt treatment compared with CS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1082 · show in text ↑
e1

“salt-tolerant phenotypes of QM6”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–932 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–128 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

QM6 had more transcripts of ROS scavenging genes than CS.

Material
QM6e0
Gene
TaSOD6 , TaCAT1/5/6 , TaPOD7, TaP5CS1e0
Outcome
expression level of ROS-scavenging genese0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
CSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“expression level of ROS-scavenging genes ( TaSOD6 , TaCAT1/5/6 , TaPOD7, TaP5CS1 ) and stress-responsive genes ( TaDREB3 , TaWRKY19 , TaERF5a, TaLTP1, TaTIP2 ) displayed more transcripts in QM6 than CS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1334 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–128 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

QM6 had more transcripts of stress responsive genes than CS.

Material
QM6e0
Gene
TaDREB3 , TaWRKY19 , TaERF5a, TaLTP1, TaTIP2e0
Outcome
stress-responsive genese0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
CSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“expression level of ROS-scavenging genes ( TaSOD6 , TaCAT1/5/6 , TaPOD7, TaP5CS1 ) and stress-responsive genes ( TaDREB3 , TaWRKY19 , TaERF5a, TaLTP1, TaTIP2 ) displayed more transcripts in QM6 than CS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1334 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–128 · show in text ↑

salinity · soil: physics · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 3 positive, 6 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

salinity · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

377 papers: 49 positive, 328 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 327 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

373 papers more in this group

See all 377 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.