Paper · 2025 · Asian Journal of Current Research

Enhancing Wheat Yield by Controlling Phosphorus Availability and Physiological Reactions through the Integration of Organic Amendments and Silicon Supplement

Jyoti; Brijesh Shivhare

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

One of the primary problems with soil used for crop production worldwide is phosphorus (P) deficiency. Using bacteria and silicon (Si) as inoculants is one of the most effective and economical ways to increase phosphorus availability and improve phosphorus utilization rates in low phosphorus conditions. Few studies have examined how silicon and phosphate-solubilizing bacteria interact to influence wheat biological reactions and yield, despite the fact that their effects on crop performance are well established. A field experiment was conducted at the botany department of Baba Mastnath University in Rohtak between November 2023 and March 2024. The study aimed to examine the combined effects of NPK and Si at four levels (5 g added as silicic acid), PSB at two levels (7.5 and 10 grams of Bacillus megaterium), and SSB at four levels (2.5, 5, 7.5, and 10 g of Bacillus mycoides) on phosphorus uptake by wheat plants and on yield parameters like grain yield, biological yield, number of spikes per spikelet and filled spikelet number, harvest index, spike length, of two wheat varieties—Golden Sharbati 306 and HD 2967. Si, SSB, and PSB were found to be effective in this study across all wheat yield metrics. The quantity of grains per panicle in each wheat variety rose more in T4 when the concentration of Si supplementation, in addition to SSB and PSB, was higher. The greatest increase in the number of filled spikelet in T4 was 17.65% for the golden Sharbati 306 variety and 18.4% for the 2967 variety. In contrast, the grain yield of the HD 2967 and Golden Sharabati 306 varieties increased by 13.31% and 15.7%, respectively, when Si was added to SSB in the T2 treatment. In the T4 treatment of both wheat varieties, Si in conjunction with SSB and PSB enhanced biological yield by 11.63% and 14.55%, respectively. The results of the study show that Silicon, SSB and PSB increased the phosphorus uptake of both wheat varieties and enhanced their yields.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon, SSB and PSB were effective across wheat yield metrics.

Treatment
Si, SSB, and PSBe0
Outcome
wheat yield metricse0
Direction
effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Si, SSB, and PSB were found to be effective in this study across all wheat yield metrics.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1215 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–15 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grains per panicle rose more in T4 with higher silicon supplementation plus SSB and PSB in each wheat variety.

Treatment
T4e0
Outcome
quantity of grains per paniclee0
Direction
rose moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The quantity of grains per panicle in each wheat variety rose more in T4 when the concentration of Si supplementation, in addition to SSB and PSB, was higher.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1374 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 increased filled spikelets by 17.65% in Golden Sharbati 306.

Material
golden Sharbati 306e0
Treatment
T4e0
Outcome
number of filled spikelete0
Direction
increasee0
Value
17.65%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The greatest increase in the number of filled spikelet in T4 was 17.65% for the golden Sharbati 306 variety and 18.4% for the 2967 variety.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1375–1514 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–15 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 increased filled spikelets by 18.4% in the 2967 variety.

Material
2967e0
Treatment
T4e0
Outcome
number of filled spikelete0
Direction
increasee0
Value
18.4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The greatest increase in the number of filled spikelet in T4 was 17.65% for the golden Sharbati 306 variety and 18.4% for the 2967 variety.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1375–1514 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–15 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T2 with silicon added to SSB increased HD 2967 grain yield by 13.31%.

Material
HD 2967e0
Treatment
Si was added to SSB in the T2 treatmente0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
13.31%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the grain yield of the HD 2967 and Golden Sharabati 306 varieties increased by 13.31% and 15.7%, respectively, when Si was added to SSB in the T2 treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1528–1684 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–15 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T2 with silicon added to SSB increased Golden Sharabati 306 grain yield by 15.7%.

Material
Golden Sharabati 306e0
Treatment
Si was added to SSB in the T2 treatmente0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
15.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the grain yield of the HD 2967 and Golden Sharabati 306 varieties increased by 13.31% and 15.7%, respectively, when Si was added to SSB in the T2 treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1528–1684 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–15 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 silicon with SSB and PSB enhanced biological yield by 11.63% in the first listed wheat variety.

Material
Golden Sharbati 306e1
Treatment
Si in conjunction with SSB and PSBe0
Outcome
biological yielde0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
11.63%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the T4 treatment of both wheat varieties, Si in conjunction with SSB and PSB enhanced biological yield by 11.63% and 14.55%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1685–1826 · show in text ↑
e1

“two wheat varieties—Golden Sharbati 306 and HD 2967”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 silicon with SSB and PSB enhanced biological yield by 14.55% in the second listed wheat variety.

Material
HD 2967e1
Treatment
Si in conjunction with SSB and PSBe0
Outcome
biological yielde0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
14.55%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the T4 treatment of both wheat varieties, Si in conjunction with SSB and PSB enhanced biological yield by 11.63% and 14.55%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1685–1826 · show in text ↑
e1

“two wheat varieties—Golden Sharbati 306 and HD 2967”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon, SSB and PSB increased phosphorus uptake in both wheat varieties.

Treatment
Silicon, SSB and PSBe0
Outcome
phosphorus uptakee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Silicon, SSB and PSB increased the phosphorus uptake of both wheat varieties and enhanced their yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1862–1965 · show in text ↑

silicon atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

90 papers: 85 positive, 5 negative or no effect

84 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

86 papers more in this group

See all 90 papers →

silicon atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 58 positive, 3 negative or no effect

57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.