Paper · 2025 · Russian Journal of Plant Physiology

Zinc Oxide Nanoparticle Sustain Photosystem II Functionality and Specific Energy Fluxes in Two Cereal Crops under Hyper-Saline Environment

Z. S. Siddiqui; Z. Abideen; E. Radicetti; et al.

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Nanotechnology is an emerging tool which has the potential to stimulate photosynthetic process in stress related environment. Unfortunately, the role of nanotechnology on photosynthetic performance explaining photosystem II functionality and specific energy fluxes in crop plants are rather scarce. Photosystem II contributes 90% of the energy requirement in plants, therefore its participation in a sub-optimal environment cannot be ruled out. The current study not only elucidates the role of Zinc-NP on light harvesting efficiency of photosystem II and specific energy fluxes but also explains their subsequent involvement in physiological tolerance against salt stress in saline soil. Oryza sativa L. rice var. Diamond and Triticum aestivum L.wheat var. Benazir seeds were sown in plastic pots and were allowed to grow in natural condition. Fifteen-day-old plants were exposed to ZnO-NP at 0.02 g/L with or without salt stress (0, 75, and 150 mM) NaCl concentration. Application of nanoparticles in saline environment showed 22 to 36% increase in rice and 9 to 25% in wheat growth. Biomass accumulations and relative water content (RWC) were also increased from 10 and 111% in a suboptimal condition. Moreover, nanoparticles reduced the oxidative damages in both rice and wheat plants indicating –20.2 to –58.3% and −28.7 to –20.2% reduction in the MDA and H2O2 production under moderate to severe salt stress. Maximum quantum yield (Fv/Fm) was less affected in severe and moderate salt stress indicating –7 and –5.4% decrease in stress condition. Foliar application of ZnO-NP improves the size and number of active reaction centre of photosynthetic machinery (Fv/Fo) and performance index (PIabs) in saline soil. It was concluded that Zn-NP not only sustained light harvesting potential in both cereal plants under salinized soil but also increases the biomass accumulation and reduces oxidative damage in a sub-optimal environment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanoparticles increased rice growth by 22 to 36% in saline conditions.

Taxon
Oryza sativa L.Oryza sativae1
Material
Diamonde1
Treatment
nanoparticlese0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
22 to 36%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of nanoparticles in saline environment showed 22 to 36% increase in rice and 9 to 25% in wheat growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1093 · show in text ↑
e1

“Oryza sativa L. rice var. Diamond”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–731 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanoparticles increased wheat growth by 9 to 25% in saline conditions.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivume1
Material
Benazire1
Treatment
nanoparticlese0
Outcome
wheat growthe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
9 to 25%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of nanoparticles in saline environment showed 22 to 36% increase in rice and 9 to 25% in wheat growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1093 · show in text ↑
e1

“Triticum aestivum L.wheat var. Benazir”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–774 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanoparticles increased biomass accumulation under suboptimal conditions.

Treatment
nanoparticlese1
Outcome
Biomass accumulationse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biomass accumulations and relative water content (RWC) were also increased from 10 and 111% in a suboptimal condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1212 · show in text ↑
e1

“nanoparticles reduced the oxidative damages in both rice and wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1297 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanoparticles increased relative water content under suboptimal conditions.

Treatment
nanoparticlese1
Outcome
relative water content (RWC)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
111%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biomass accumulations and relative water content (RWC) were also increased from 10 and 111% in a suboptimal condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1212 · show in text ↑
e1

“nanoparticles reduced the oxidative damages in both rice and wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1297 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanoparticles reduced MDA production in rice and wheat under moderate to severe salinity.

Treatment
nanoparticlese0
Outcome
MDAe0
Direction
reductione0
Value
–20.2 to –58.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nanoparticles reduced the oxidative damages in both rice and wheat plants indicating –20.2 to –58.3% and −28.7 to –20.2% reduction in the MDA and H2O2 production under moderate to severe salt stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1422 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanoparticles reduced H2O2 production in rice and wheat under moderate to severe salinity.

Treatment
nanoparticlese0
Outcome
H2O2 productione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
−28.7 to –20.2%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nanoparticles reduced the oxidative damages in both rice and wheat plants indicating –20.2 to –58.3% and −28.7 to –20.2% reduction in the MDA and H2O2 production under moderate to severe salt stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1422 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum quantum yield decreased 7% in severe salt stress.

Outcome
Maximum quantum yield (Fv/Fm)e0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
–7e0
Qualifier
severee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum quantum yield (Fv/Fm) was less affected in severe and moderate salt stress indicating –7 and –5.4% decrease in stress condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1424–1559 · show in text ↑
e1

“both rice and wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1271–1297 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum quantum yield decreased 5.4% in moderate salt stress.

Outcome
Maximum quantum yield (Fv/Fm)e0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
–5.4%e0
Qualifier
moderate salt stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum quantum yield (Fv/Fm) was less affected in severe and moderate salt stress indicating –7 and –5.4% decrease in stress condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1424–1559 · show in text ↑
e1

“both rice and wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1271–1297 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar ZnO nanoparticles improved active reaction centre size and number, Fv/Fo and PIabs in saline soil.

Treatment
Foliar application of ZnO-NPe0
Outcome
size and number of active reaction centre of photosynthetic machinery (Fv/Fo) and performance index (PIabs)e0
Direction
improvese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application of ZnO-NP improves the size and number of active reaction centre of photosynthetic machinery (Fv/Fo) and performance index (PIabs) in saline soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1561–1725 · show in text ↑
e1

“both rice and wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1271–1297 · show in text ↑

zinc oxide · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

zinc oxide · physiology: photosynthesis · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

nanoparticle · physiology: oxidative · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 24 positive, 5 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

nanoparticle · physiology: photosynthesis · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 28 positive, 3 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

nanoparticle · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 35 positive, 6 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

nanoparticle · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

42 papers: 36 positive, 6 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

application · physiology: photosynthesis · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

47 papers: 46 positive, 1 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

application · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

72 papers: 70 positive, 2 negative or no effect

69 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

68 papers more in this group

See all 72 papers →

8 of 12 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.