Abstract
The continuous application of chemical fertilizer mainly nitrogen has bad influence to soil.On the other hand the expensive price of fertilizer should be solved by maximized affect to plant productivity.The ordinary Nitrogen fertilizer has bad influence to soil water with high nitrogen content around the plantation mainly..The Slow release Nitrogen Fertilizer has possibility to reduce the production cost of plant and more circumstance friendly.This Research was conducted in order to find out the influence of Slow Release Nitrogen Fertilizer and Nitrogen Fertilizer for sugarcane plant as the raw materials of green energy bioethanol.The Sugarcane plant needs fertilizer in order to improve plant productivity.The chemical fertilizer usually not circumctance friendly but the slow release chemical fertlilizer may have something different.The application of slow release chemical fertilizer may be better for soil fertility The application of slow release nitrogen fertilizer in GMP 2 and Kidang Kencana sugarcane plant seemed better rather than ordinary nitogen fertilizer in Yellow -Red Podzolic Soil in Negara Bumi Ilir, Center of Lampung, Indonesia.. Results of a field experiment with sugarcane showed that the treatment of urea with slow release nitrogen fertilizer (coated nitrogen fertilizer) increased its efficiency by preventing N losses, resulting in significantly higher cane yields.In one of the years, sulphur-coated urea at 300 kg N/ha gave higher total sugar content in the juice and significantly more commercial cane sugar (CCS) than uncoated urea.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
Slow-release (coated) urea gave significantly higher sugarcane cane yields than the comparator.
- Taxon
- sugarcanee1
- Treatment
- slow release nitrogen fertilizer (coated nitrogen fertilizer)e1
- Outcome
- cane yieldse1
- Direction
- highere1
- Qualifier
- by preventing N lossese1
- Setting
- field experimente1
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e1“Results of a field experiment with sugarcane showed that the treatment of urea with slow release nitrogen fertilizer (coated nitrogen fertilizer) increased its efficiency by preventing N losses, resulting in significantly higher cane yields”
Claim · model-written summary
In one season, sulphur-coated urea at 300 kg N/ha gave higher total sugar content in the juice than uncoated urea.
Verbatim
e1“Results of a field experiment with sugarcane showed that the treatment of urea with slow release nitrogen fertilizer (coated nitrogen fertilizer) increased its efficiency by preventing N losses, resulting in significantly higher cane yields”
e2“In one of the years, sulphur-coated urea at 300 kg N/ha gave higher total sugar content in the juice and significantly more commercial cane sugar (CCS) than uncoated urea”
Claim · model-written summary
In one season, sulphur-coated urea at 300 kg N/ha gave significantly more commercial cane sugar (CCS) than uncoated urea.
Verbatim
e1“Results of a field experiment with sugarcane showed that the treatment of urea with slow release nitrogen fertilizer (coated nitrogen fertilizer) increased its efficiency by preventing N losses, resulting in significantly higher cane yields”
e2“In one of the years, sulphur-coated urea at 300 kg N/ha gave higher total sugar content in the juice and significantly more commercial cane sugar (CCS) than uncoated urea”
The same questions in other papers
nitrogen · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ
117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
133 papers more in this group
See all 137 papers →nitrogen · molecular: metabolites · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- negative
17 papers more in this group
See all 21 papers →nitrogen · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- negative
36 papers more in this group
See all 40 papers →fertilization · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
311 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
342 papers more in this group
See all 346 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.