Paper · 2025 · Agriculture Association of Textile Chemical and Critical Reviews

Sustainable production and pest management of okra[Abelmoschus esculentus(L.)Moench] through intercropping

Rishav Banerjee; Partha Choudhuri; Ranodip majumder; et al.

12
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field trial was conducted during pre kharif season of 2022-23 at the Horticultural Research Station,Mondouri,Bidhan Chandra KrishiViswavidyalaya, West Bengal,India to assess the impact of intercropping on sustainable production and eco-friendly management of major insect pests of okra under maize border crop. The trial was laid out in a Randomized block design with seven different treatment combinations.Jassids and whitefly,specially the white flies,vector of Yellow Vein Mosiac Disease, have become one of the major challenges for the commercial okra growers of this area mainly in rainy season.The preswnt work has been carried out with an aim to manage these notorious pests of okra in a sustainable manner. The results showed that intercropping had a significant effect on variousgrowth,yield,quality, economics and major pest complexes of okra.Trial result revealed that okra and cowpea combination recorded the highest okra equivalent yield (26.15 ton/ha),closely followed by okra and marigold (22.89 ton/ha). Regarding pest control, significantly maximum reduction of jassid and whitefly were noticed in okra and marigold association (35.06% and 27.12 % respectively).intercropping also showed a notable effect on the quality parameter of the main crop. Intercropping okra with cowpea produced a significantly maximum concentration of ascorbic acid(22.5mg/100g) than other treatments.From an economic standpoint, the intercropping system of okra and cowpea system exhibited highest net return(Rs.2,35,038.50) and benefit-cost ratio (B:C ratio3.98). The intercropping system of okra and cowpea was an efficient user of biological resources showing maximum values for land equivalent ratio(1.50), relative crowding coefficient (2.22) and lowest aggressivity value (-0.12). Okra and amaranthus combination recorded lowest values for the above – mentioned parameters. So it can be concluded that intercropping okra with cowpea might be a sustainableproductionsystemfor farmers in the gangetic plains of West Bengal.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Okra–cowpea gave the highest okra equivalent yield of 26.15 ton/ha.

Treatment
okra and cowpea combinatione0
Outcome
okra equivalent yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
26.15 ton/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“okra and cowpea combination recorded the highest okra equivalent yield (26.15 ton/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–967 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Okra–marigold yielded 22.89 ton/ha okra equivalent yield, second to cowpea.

Treatment
okra and marigolde0
Outcome
okra equivalent yielde1
Direction
closely followede1
Value
22.89 ton/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“okra and marigold (22.89 ton/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1020 · show in text ↑
e1

“okra equivalent yield (26.15 ton/ha),closely followed by okra and marigold (22.89 ton/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1020 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Okra–marigold reduced jassids by 35.06%.

Treatment
okra and marigold associatione0
Interactor
jasside0pest
Outcome
jasside0
Direction
reductione0
Value
35.06%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly maximum reduction of jassid and whitefly were noticed in okra and marigold association (35.06% and 27.12 % respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1180 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Okra–marigold reduced whitefly by 27.12%.

Treatment
okra and marigold associatione0
Interactor
whiteflye0pest
Outcome
whiteflye0
Direction
reductione0
Value
27.12 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly maximum reduction of jassid and whitefly were noticed in okra and marigold association (35.06% and 27.12 % respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1180 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Okra–cowpea produced the highest ascorbic acid concentration, 22.5mg/100g, among treatments.

Treatment
Intercropping okra with cowpeae0
Outcome
concentration of ascorbic acide0
Direction
maximume0
Value
22.5mg/100ge0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping okra with cowpea produced a significantly maximum concentration of ascorbic acid(22.5mg/100g) than other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1396 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Okra–cowpea had the highest net return of Rs.2,35,038.50.

Treatment
okra and cowpea systeme0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
higheste0
Value
Rs.2,35,038.50e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“okra and cowpea system exhibited highest net return(Rs.2,35,038.50) and benefit-cost ratio (B:C ratio3.98)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1454–1560 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Okra–cowpea had the highest benefit-cost ratio, 3.98.

Treatment
okra and cowpea systeme0
Outcome
benefit-cost ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3.98e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“okra and cowpea system exhibited highest net return(Rs.2,35,038.50) and benefit-cost ratio (B:C ratio3.98)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1454–1560 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Okra–cowpea had maximum land equivalent ratio of 1.50.

Treatment
okra and cowpeae0
Outcome
land equivalent ratioe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
1.50e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“okra and cowpea was an efficient user of biological resources showing maximum values for land equivalent ratio(1.50), relative crowding coefficient (2.22) and lowest aggressivity value (-0.12)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1590–1782 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Okra–cowpea had maximum relative crowding coefficient of 2.22.

Treatment
okra and cowpeae0
Outcome
relative crowding coefficiente0
Direction
maximume0
Value
2.22e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“okra and cowpea was an efficient user of biological resources showing maximum values for land equivalent ratio(1.50), relative crowding coefficient (2.22) and lowest aggressivity value (-0.12)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1590–1782 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Okra–cowpea had the lowest aggressivity value, -0.12.

Treatment
okra and cowpeae0
Outcome
aggressivity valuee0
Direction
loweste0
Value
-0.12e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“okra and cowpea was an efficient user of biological resources showing maximum values for land equivalent ratio(1.50), relative crowding coefficient (2.22) and lowest aggressivity value (-0.12)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1590–1782 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Okra–amaranthus had the lowest values for the listed resource-use parameters.

Treatment
Okra and amaranthus combinatione0
Outcome
the above – mentioned parameterse0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Okra and amaranthus combination recorded lowest values for the above – mentioned parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1784–1875 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend okra–cowpea as a sustainable production system for farmers in the Gangetic plains of West Bengal.

Outcome
intercropping okra with cowpea might be a sustainableproductionsysteme0
Setting
gangetic plains of West Bengale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping okra with cowpea might be a sustainableproductionsystemfor farmers in the gangetic plains of West Bengal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1905–2023 · show in text ↑

Vigna unguiculata · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

intercropping · quality: phytochemicals · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.