Paper · 2025 · International Journal of Plant & Soil Science

Assessment of Biochar Effects on Essential Nutrient Uptake in Chickpea Under Field Conditions

ANAND NAIK; MALLIKARJUN REDDY; MEGHARANI; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during the rabi season of 2021–22 at ICAR-Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Kalaburagi, to assess the effects of biochar on essential nutrient uptake in chickpea under field conditions. The study employed a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with eight treatments: absolute control, recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) alone, biochar at 2 t ha⁻¹, biochar at 4 t ha⁻¹, 50% RDF + biochar at 2 t ha⁻¹, 50% RDF + biochar at 4 t ha⁻¹, 100% RDF + biochar at 2 t ha⁻¹, and 100% RDF + biochar at 4 t ha⁻¹. Significant differences in nutrient concentrations were observed among the treatments. The application of 100% RDF combined with biochar at 4 t ha⁻¹ resulted in the highest nutrient concentrations in both grain and stover—nitrogen at 3.62% and 1.25%, phosphorus at 0.51% and 0.30%, and potassium at 1.31% and 1.69%, respectively. In contrast, the absolute control recorded the lowest nutrient concentrations. The same treatment (100% RDF + biochar at 4 t ha⁻¹) also resulted in the highest nutrient uptake, with nitrogen uptake of 52.01 kg ha⁻¹ in grain and 22.10 kg ha⁻¹ in stover, phosphorus uptake of 7.32 kg ha⁻¹ in grain and 5.26 kg ha⁻¹ in stover, and potassium uptake of 18.80 kg ha⁻¹ in grain and 29.88 kg ha⁻¹ in stover.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient concentrations differed significantly among treatments.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
nutrient concentrationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–70 · show in text ↑
e0

“Significant differences in nutrient concentrations were observed among the treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–612 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined 100% RDF and 4 t ha⁻¹ biochar treatment gave the highest grain and stover nitrogen concentrations, 3.62% and 1.25%, respectively.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Organ / stage
grain and stovere0
Treatment
100% RDF combined with biochar at 4 t ha⁻¹e0
Outcome
nitrogene0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3.62% and 1.25%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 62–70 · show in text ↑
e0

“The application of 100% RDF combined with biochar at 4 t ha⁻¹ resulted in the highest nutrient concentrations in both grain and stover—nitrogen at 3.62% and 1.25%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–775 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment gave the highest grain and stover phosphorus concentrations, 0.51% and 0.30%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Organ / stage
grain and stovere0
Treatment
100% RDF combined with biochar at 4 t ha⁻¹e0
Outcome
phosphoruse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.51% and 0.30%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 62–70 · show in text ↑
e0

“The application of 100% RDF combined with biochar at 4 t ha⁻¹ resulted in the highest nutrient concentrations in both grain and stover—nitrogen at 3.62% and 1.25%, phosphorus at 0.51% and 0.30%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–806 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment gave the highest grain and stover potassium concentrations, 1.31% and 1.69%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Organ / stage
grain and stovere0
Treatment
100% RDF combined with biochar at 4 t ha⁻¹e0
Outcome
potassiume0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.31% and 1.69%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 62–70 · show in text ↑
e0

“The application of 100% RDF combined with biochar at 4 t ha⁻¹ resulted in the highest nutrient concentrations in both grain and stover—nitrogen at 3.62% and 1.25%, phosphorus at 0.51% and 0.30%, and potassium at 1.31% and 1.69%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–840 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The absolute control had the lowest nutrient concentrations.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
absolute controle0
Outcome
nutrient concentrationse0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 62–70 · show in text ↑
e0

“In contrast, the absolute control recorded the lowest nutrient concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–934 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment gave the highest nitrogen uptake, 52.01 kg ha⁻¹ in grain and 22.10 kg ha⁻¹ in stover.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
100% RDF + biochar at 4 t ha⁻¹e0
Outcome
nitrogen uptakee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
52.01 kg ha⁻¹ in grain and 22.10 kg ha⁻¹ in stovere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 62–70 · show in text ↑
e0

“The same treatment (100% RDF + biochar at 4 t ha⁻¹) also resulted in the highest nutrient uptake, with nitrogen uptake of 52.01 kg ha⁻¹ in grain and 22.10 kg ha⁻¹ in stover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment gave the highest phosphorus uptake, 7.32 kg ha⁻¹ in grain and 5.26 kg ha⁻¹ in stover.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
100% RDF + biochar at 4 t ha⁻¹e0
Outcome
phosphorus uptakee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
7.32 kg ha⁻¹ in grain and 5.26 kg ha⁻¹ in stovere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 62–70 · show in text ↑
e0

“The same treatment (100% RDF + biochar at 4 t ha⁻¹) also resulted in the highest nutrient uptake, with nitrogen uptake of 52.01 kg ha⁻¹ in grain and 22.10 kg ha⁻¹ in stover, phosphorus uptake of 7.32 kg ha⁻¹ in grain and 5.26 kg ha⁻¹ in stover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1178 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment gave the highest potassium uptake, 18.80 kg ha⁻¹ in grain and 29.88 kg ha⁻¹ in stover.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
100% RDF + biochar at 4 t ha⁻¹e0
Outcome
potassium uptakee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
18.80 kg ha⁻¹ in grain and 29.88 kg ha⁻¹ in stovere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 62–70 · show in text ↑
e0

“The same treatment (100% RDF + biochar at 4 t ha⁻¹) also resulted in the highest nutrient uptake, with nitrogen uptake of 52.01 kg ha⁻¹ in grain and 22.10 kg ha⁻¹ in stover, phosphorus uptake of 7.32 kg ha⁻¹ in grain and 5.26 kg ha⁻¹ in stover, and potassium uptake of 18.80 kg ha⁻¹ in grain and 29.88 kg ha⁻¹ in stover.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1255 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

81 papers: 80 positive, 1 negative or no effect

79 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

77 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

biochar · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.