Paper · 2025 · The Crop Journal

Integrated physiological and transcriptomic analyses reveal the mechanism of reduction in wheat fertile floret number under spring low-temperature stress

Ying Weng; Zhiwei Tang; Weixiang Huang; et al.

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

With the intensification of climate change, spring low-temperature stress (SLTS) leads to floret degeneration and a decrease in grain number. This study investigated the physiological mechanisms underlying SLTS-induced floret degeneration using two wheat varieties with contrasting cold sensitivity. SLTS caused yellowing and shrinkage of floret primordia, increasing floret degradation and fertile floret abortion, ultimately reducing grains per spike by 12.2%–26.1%. SLTS disrupted nutrient supply, impairing dry matter accumulation in young spikes. At 0–15 DALTS, SLTS caused a brief increase in the sugar content of young spikes (0–3 DALTS), followed by a rapid decrease (6–15 DALTS), while the total nitrogen content keeps decreasing. SLTS altered key enzyme activities, enhancing sucrose synthase and sucrose phosphate synthase but suppressing nitrate reductase and glutamine synthetase. Transcriptomic analysis revealed that SLTS perturbed starch and sucrose metabolism, carbon and nitrogen metabolism, and amino sugar pathways, altering soluble sugars, sucrose, fructose, and protein levels. SLTS disrupted carbon–nitrogen metabolic homeostasis, thereby reducing the number of fertile florets and ultimately leading to a decrease in grain number per spike. These findings enhance understanding of SLTS impacts on wheat floret development and provide insights for improving low-temperature tolerance and yield stability in wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SLTS caused yellowing and shrinkage of floret primordia in wheat.

Organ / stage
floret primordiae1
Treatment
SLTSe1
Outcome
yellowing and shrinkage of floret primordiae1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“SLTS caused yellowing and shrinkage of floret primordia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 300–355 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SLTS increased floret degradation and fertile floret abortion in wheat.

Treatment
SLTSe1
Outcome
floret degradation and fertile floret abortione1
Direction
increasinge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“SLTS caused yellowing and shrinkage of floret primordia, increasing floret degradation and fertile floret abortion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 300–414 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SLTS reduced grains per spike in wheat by 12.2%-26.1%.

Treatment
SLTSe1
Outcome
grains per spikee1
Direction
reducinge1
Value
12.2%–26.1%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“SLTS caused yellowing and shrinkage of floret primordia, increasing floret degradation and fertile floret abortion, ultimately reducing grains per spike by 12.2%–26.1%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 300–467 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SLTS disrupted nutrient supply, impairing dry matter accumulation in young spikes.

Organ / stage
young spikese1
Treatment
SLTSe1
Outcome
dry matter accumulatione1
Direction
impairinge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“SLTS disrupted nutrient supply, impairing dry matter accumulation in young spikes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–550 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SLTS caused a brief increase in sugar content of young spikes at 0-3 DALTS.

Organ / stage
young spikese1
Treatment
SLTSe1
Outcome
sugar contente1
Direction
increasee1
Qualifier
0–3 DALTSe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“At 0–15 DALTS, SLTS caused a brief increase in the sugar content of young spikes (0–3 DALTS), followed by a rapid decrease (6–15 DALTS), while the total nitrogen content keeps decreasing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–738 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SLTS caused a rapid decrease in sugar content of young spikes at 6-15 DALTS.

Organ / stage
young spikese1
Treatment
SLTSe1
Outcome
sugar contente1
Direction
decreasee1
Qualifier
6–15 DALTSe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“At 0–15 DALTS, SLTS caused a brief increase in the sugar content of young spikes (0–3 DALTS), followed by a rapid decrease (6–15 DALTS), while the total nitrogen content keeps decreasing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–738 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total nitrogen content of wheat young spikes kept decreasing under SLTS during 0-15 DALTS.

Treatment
SLTSe1
Outcome
total nitrogen contente1
Direction
decreasinge1
Qualifier
At 0–15 DALTSe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“At 0–15 DALTS, SLTS caused a brief increase in the sugar content of young spikes (0–3 DALTS), followed by a rapid decrease (6–15 DALTS), while the total nitrogen content keeps decreasing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–738 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SLTS enhanced the activities of sucrose synthase and sucrose phosphate synthase.

Treatment
SLTSe1
Gene
sucrose synthase and sucrose phosphate synthasee1
Outcome
key enzyme activitiese1
Direction
enhancinge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“SLTS altered key enzyme activities, enhancing sucrose synthase and sucrose phosphate synthase but suppressing nitrate reductase and glutamine synthetase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–892 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SLTS suppressed the activities of nitrate reductase and glutamine synthetase.

Treatment
SLTSe1
Gene
nitrate reductase and glutamine synthetasee1
Outcome
key enzyme activitiese1
Direction
suppressinge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“SLTS altered key enzyme activities, enhancing sucrose synthase and sucrose phosphate synthase but suppressing nitrate reductase and glutamine synthetase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–892 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transcriptomic analysis showed that SLTS perturbed starch and sucrose metabolism, carbon and nitrogen metabolism, and amino sugar pathways.

Treatment
SLTSe1
Outcome
starch and sucrose metabolism, carbon and nitrogen metabolism, and amino sugar pathwayse1
Direction
perturbede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Transcriptomic analysis revealed that SLTS perturbed starch and sucrose metabolism, carbon and nitrogen metabolism, and amino sugar pathways”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1034 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SLTS altered soluble sugar, sucrose and fructose levels.

Treatment
SLTSe1
Outcome
soluble sugars, sucrose, fructosee1
Direction
alteringe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Transcriptomic analysis revealed that SLTS perturbed starch and sucrose metabolism, carbon and nitrogen metabolism, and amino sugar pathways, altering soluble sugars, sucrose, fructose, and protein levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1098 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SLTS altered protein levels.

Treatment
SLTSe1
Outcome
protein levelse1
Direction
alteringe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Transcriptomic analysis revealed that SLTS perturbed starch and sucrose metabolism, carbon and nitrogen metabolism, and amino sugar pathways, altering soluble sugars, sucrose, fructose, and protein levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1098 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that SLTS disrupted carbon-nitrogen metabolic homeostasis, thereby reducing fertile floret number and grain number per spike.

Treatment
SLTSe1
Outcome
number of fertile floretse1
Qualifier
disrupted carbon–nitrogen metabolic homeostasise1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“SLTS disrupted carbon–nitrogen metabolic homeostasis, thereby reducing the number of fertile florets and ultimately leading to a decrease in grain number per spike”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1263 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑

cold · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

67 papers: 21 positive, 46 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

63 papers more in this group

See all 67 papers →

cold · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 17 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.