Paper · 2025 · International Journal of Plant & Soil Science

Modelling the Impact of Regulated Water Management on Growth and Yield Parameters of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Saroj Kumari; Garima Chauhan; Anil Kumar; et al.

12
claims
25
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Wheat is one of the most important cereal crops providing food to one fifth of the world population. Wheat cultivation faces numerous challenges, including climate change impacts like heat stress and water scarcity, biotic stresses such as diseases and pest and soil degradation. The food security under limited resources and global climate change has become a major challenge for sustainability. Therefore, the present field investigation was conducted in wheat crop during rabi 2021-22 at Irrigation and Water Management Farm of Department of Soil Science, CSK HPKV, Palampur to study the effect of regulated deficit irrigation on the growth and yield attributes of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). The treatments consisted of selected combination of four deficit levels viz. high (50% ETC), medium (70% ETC), low (90% ETC) and free from deficit (100% ETC) and three phases of application viz. phase I (CRI and jointing), phase II (flowering) and phase III (dough stage). A total of eight combinations viz. FFF: Free from deficit at all three phases; LLL: Low deficit at all three phases; MMM: Medium deficit at all three phases; FMM: Free from deficit at phase I, Medium at phase II, Medium at phase III; HFM: High at phase I, Free from deficit at phase II, Medium at phase III; MFH: Medium at phase I, Free from deficit at phase II, High at phase III; MFM: Medium at phase I, Free from deficit at phase II, Medium at phase III; HFH: High at phase I, Free from deficit at phase II and High at phase III, were tested under randomized block design, replicated thrice. The soil of the experimental site was silty clay loam in texture, acidic in reaction, medium in organic carbon, available potassium, high in available phosphorus and low in available nitrogen. Results revealed that among all regulated water deficit schemes the low deficit LLL scheme of 90% ETC application at CRI and jointing, flowering and dough stage resulted in higher plant height (105.4 cm), higher dry matter accumulation (763.1 gm-2), more no. of tillers per meter square (236.4), more no. of ears per meter square (224.0), more no. of grains per ear (38.3), higher 1000 grain weight (42.6 g), higher grain yield (3129 kg ha-1), higher straw yield (4558 kg ha-1), higher values of biological yield (7687 kg ha-1) and harvest index (40.8) that was statistically similar to the wheat cultivation under water deficit free condition at all critical stages of growth (FFF) having values (107.0 cm, 780.3 gm-2, 242.7, 231.0, 39.5, 43.3 (g), 3320 kg ha-1, 4785 kg ha-1, 8105 kg ha-1, 41.0 g for plant height, dry matter accumulation, no. of tillers per meter square, no. of ears per meter square, no. of grains per ear, 1000 grain weight, grain yield, straw yield, biological yield and harvest index, respectively). Any water deficit below 90% ETC especially a high deficit of 50% ETC at phase I (CRI and jointing) and phase III (dough) (HFH) resulted in significant decrease in yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The LLL scheme (90% ETC at all three phases) gave higher plant height than the other regulated deficit schemes.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
90% ETC application at CRI and jointing, flowering and dough stagee1
Outcome
plant heighte1
Direction
highere1
Value
105.4 cme1
Comparator
regulated water deficit schemese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–113 · show in text ↑
e1

“among all regulated water deficit schemes the low deficit LLL scheme of 90% ETC application at CRI and jointing, flowering and dough stage resulted in higher plant height (105.4 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1781–1962 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The LLL scheme (90% ETC at all three phases) gave higher dry matter accumulation than the other regulated deficit schemes.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
90% ETC application at CRI and jointing, flowering and dough stagee1
Outcome
dry matter accumulatione1
Direction
highere1
Value
763.1 gm-2e1
Comparator
regulated water deficit schemese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–113 · show in text ↑
e1

“among all regulated water deficit schemes the low deficit LLL scheme of 90% ETC application at CRI and jointing, flowering and dough stage resulted in higher plant height (105.4 cm), higher dry matter accumulation (763.1 gm-2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1781–2007 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The LLL scheme (90% ETC at all three phases) gave more tillers per meter square than the other regulated deficit schemes.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
90% ETC application at CRI and jointing, flowering and dough stagee1
Outcome
no. of tillers per meter squaree1
Direction
moree1
Value
236.4e1
Comparator
regulated water deficit schemese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–113 · show in text ↑
e1

“among all regulated water deficit schemes the low deficit LLL scheme of 90% ETC application at CRI and jointing, flowering and dough stage resulted in higher plant height (105.4 cm), higher dry matter accumulation (763.1 gm-2), more no. of tillers per meter square (236.4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1781–2053 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The LLL scheme (90% ETC at all three phases) gave more ears per meter square than the other regulated deficit schemes.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
90% ETC application at CRI and jointing, flowering and dough stagee1
Outcome
no. of ears per meter squaree1
Direction
moree1
Value
224.0e1
Comparator
regulated water deficit schemese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–113 · show in text ↑
e1

“among all regulated water deficit schemes the low deficit LLL scheme of 90% ETC application at CRI and jointing, flowering and dough stage resulted in higher plant height (105.4 cm), higher dry matter accumulation (763.1 gm-2), more no. of tillers per meter square (236.4), more no. of ears per meter square (224.0)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1781–2096 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The LLL scheme (90% ETC at all three phases) gave more grains per ear than the other regulated deficit schemes.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
90% ETC application at CRI and jointing, flowering and dough stagee1
Outcome
no. of grains per eare1
Direction
moree1
Value
38.3e1
Comparator
regulated water deficit schemese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–113 · show in text ↑
e1

“among all regulated water deficit schemes the low deficit LLL scheme of 90% ETC application at CRI and jointing, flowering and dough stage resulted in higher plant height (105.4 cm), higher dry matter accumulation (763.1 gm-2), more no. of tillers per meter square (236.4), more no. of ears per meter square (224.0), more no. of grains per ear (38.3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1781–2131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The LLL scheme (90% ETC at all three phases) gave higher 1000 grain weight than the other regulated deficit schemes.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
90% ETC application at CRI and jointing, flowering and dough stagee1
Outcome
1000 grain weighte1
Direction
highere1
Value
42.6 ge1
Comparator
regulated water deficit schemese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–113 · show in text ↑
e1

“among all regulated water deficit schemes the low deficit LLL scheme of 90% ETC application at CRI and jointing, flowering and dough stage resulted in higher plant height (105.4 cm), higher dry matter accumulation (763.1 gm-2), more no. of tillers per meter square (236.4), more no. of ears per meter square (224.0), more no. of grains per ear (38.3), higher 1000 grain weight (42.6 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1781–2166 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The LLL scheme (90% ETC at all three phases) gave higher grain yield than the other regulated deficit schemes.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
90% ETC application at CRI and jointing, flowering and dough stagee1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
3129 kg ha-1e1
Comparator
regulated water deficit schemese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–113 · show in text ↑
e1

“among all regulated water deficit schemes the low deficit LLL scheme of 90% ETC application at CRI and jointing, flowering and dough stage resulted in higher plant height (105.4 cm), higher dry matter accumulation (763.1 gm-2), more no. of tillers per meter square (236.4), more no. of ears per meter square (224.0), more no. of grains per ear (38.3), higher 1000 grain weight (42.6 g), higher grain yield (3129 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1781–2201 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The LLL scheme (90% ETC at all three phases) gave higher straw yield than the other regulated deficit schemes.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
90% ETC application at CRI and jointing, flowering and dough stagee1
Outcome
straw yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
4558 kg ha-1e1
Comparator
regulated water deficit schemese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–113 · show in text ↑
e1

“among all regulated water deficit schemes the low deficit LLL scheme of 90% ETC application at CRI and jointing, flowering and dough stage resulted in higher plant height (105.4 cm), higher dry matter accumulation (763.1 gm-2), more no. of tillers per meter square (236.4), more no. of ears per meter square (224.0), more no. of grains per ear (38.3), higher 1000 grain weight (42.6 g), higher grain yield (3129 kg ha-1), higher straw yield (4558 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1781–2236 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The LLL scheme (90% ETC at all three phases) gave higher biological yield than the other regulated deficit schemes.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
90% ETC application at CRI and jointing, flowering and dough stagee1
Outcome
biological yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
7687 kg ha-1e1
Comparator
regulated water deficit schemese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–113 · show in text ↑
e1

“among all regulated water deficit schemes the low deficit LLL scheme of 90% ETC application at CRI and jointing, flowering and dough stage resulted in higher plant height (105.4 cm), higher dry matter accumulation (763.1 gm-2), more no. of tillers per meter square (236.4), more no. of ears per meter square (224.0), more no. of grains per ear (38.3), higher 1000 grain weight (42.6 g), higher grain yield (3129 kg ha-1), higher straw yield (4558 kg ha-1), higher values of biological yield (7687 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1781–2286 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The LLL scheme (90% ETC at all three phases) gave higher harvest index than the other regulated deficit schemes.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
90% ETC application at CRI and jointing, flowering and dough stagee1
Outcome
harvest indexe1
Direction
highere1
Value
40.8e1
Comparator
regulated water deficit schemese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–113 · show in text ↑
e1

“among all regulated water deficit schemes the low deficit LLL scheme of 90% ETC application at CRI and jointing, flowering and dough stage resulted in higher plant height (105.4 cm), higher dry matter accumulation (763.1 gm-2), more no. of tillers per meter square (236.4), more no. of ears per meter square (224.0), more no. of grains per ear (38.3), higher 1000 grain weight (42.6 g), higher grain yield (3129 kg ha-1), higher straw yield (4558 kg ha-1), higher values of biological yield (7687 kg ha-1) and harvest index (40.8)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1781–2311 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The LLL regulated deficit scheme was statistically similar to the water-deficit-free FFF scheme for growth and yield attributes.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
regulated deficit irrigatione2
Outcome
growth and yield attributese2
Direction
statistically similare3
Comparator
water deficit free condition at all critical stages of growthe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–113 · show in text ↑
e2

“regulated deficit irrigation on the growth and yield attributes of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–673 · show in text ↑
e3

“statistically similar to the wheat cultivation under water deficit free condition at all critical stages of growth (FFF)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2321–2441 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Any water deficit below 90% ETC, especially HFH, significantly decreased wheat yield.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
water deficit below 90% ETC especially a high deficit of 50% ETCe1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
decreasee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–113 · show in text ↑
e1

“Any water deficit below 90% ETC especially a high deficit of 50% ETC at phase I (CRI and jointing) and phase III (dough) (HFH) resulted in significant decrease in yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2783–2951 · show in text ↑

stage · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 24 positive, 13 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

stage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

160 papers: 95 positive, 65 negative or no effect

94 papers in the same direction as this paper · 63 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

156 papers more in this group

See all 160 papers →

drought · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

632 papers: 95 positive, 537 negative or no effect

536 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

628 papers more in this group

See all 632 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

190 papers in the same direction as this paper · 798 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.