Paper · 2025 · International Journal of Research in Agronomy

Influence of boron and iron applications on growth components, yield and yield components of wheat crop in Himachal Pradesh

Aniket .; Mohd Shah Alam

8
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present study titled “Influence of boron and iron applications on growth components, yield and yield components of wheat crop in Himachal Pradesh” was conducted during the Rabi season of 2023-2024 at the Research Farm of the School of Agriculture, Abhilashi University, Mandi (H.P.). The experiment was laid out in a randomized block design with eight treatments; each replicated three times. The treatments were: T₁ - Control (no fertilizer), T₂ - 100% recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF), T₃ - 100% RDF + 10 kg ha-1 boron, T₄ - 100% RDF + 20 kg ha-1 iron, T₅ - 75% RDF + 10 kg ha-1 boron, T₆ - 75% RDF + 20 kg ha-1 iron, T₇ - 100% RDF + 10 kg ha-1 boron + 20 kg ha-1 iron, and T₈ - 75% RDF + 10 kg ha-1 boron + 20 kg ha-1. The soils of the investigation field were moderately acidic in reaction, medium in electrical conductivity, low in organic carbon, available nitrogen, phosphorus and medium in potassium before the experimentation was started. The results showed that adding iron and boron along with RDF variation i.e., 100% & 75% significantly improved growth and yield of wheat compared to the control. The highest number of tillers, dry matter accumulation, and plant height were recorded under treatment T₇, which was statically at par with treatment T8. Yield attributes like effective tillers, spike length, grains per spike, grain yield, straw yield, and biological yield were also maximum under T₇. However, test weight and harvest index were not significantly affected by the treatments. The study found that the application of iron and boron together considerably boosts a variety of growth characteristics, yield attributes and yield in the wheat plant. Finally, the findings of this study also demonstrated the significance of iron and boron in enhancing grain output, and a thorough, large-scale investigation is a good goal for raising grain yield in cereals.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Before experimentation, field soils were moderately acidic, medium in electrical conductivity and low in organic carbon.

Outcome
moderately acidic in reaction, medium in electrical conductivity, low in organic carbone0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The soils of the investigation field were moderately acidic in reaction, medium in electrical conductivity, low in organic carbon, available nitrogen, phosphorus and medium in potassium before the experimentation was started.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–955 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Before experimentation, soils were low in available nitrogen and phosphorus and medium in potassium.

Outcome
available nitrogen, phosphorus and medium in potassiume0
Qualifier
low in organic carbon, available nitrogen, phosphoruse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The soils of the investigation field were moderately acidic in reaction, medium in electrical conductivity, low in organic carbon, available nitrogen, phosphorus and medium in potassium before the experimentation was started.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–955 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding iron and boron with 100% or 75% RDF significantly improved wheat growth and yield relative to control.

Treatment
adding iron and boron along with RDF variation i.e., 100% & 75%e0
Outcome
growth and yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that adding iron and boron along with RDF variation i.e., 100% & 75% significantly improved growth and yield of wheat compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T₇ produced the highest tiller number, dry matter accumulation and plant height, statistically at par with T8.

Treatment
T₇e0
Outcome
number of tillers, dry matter accumulation, and plant heighte0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
T8e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest number of tillers, dry matter accumulation, and plant height were recorded under treatment T₇, which was statically at par with treatment T8.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1271 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Effective tillers, spike length and grains per spike were maximum under T₇.

Treatment
T₇e0
Outcome
effective tillers, spike length, grains per spikee0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield attributes like effective tillers, spike length, grains per spike, grain yield, straw yield, and biological yield were also maximum under T₇.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1419 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain, straw and biological yields were maximum under T₇.

Treatment
T₇e0
Outcome
grain yield, straw yield, and biological yielde0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield attributes like effective tillers, spike length, grains per spike, grain yield, straw yield, and biological yield were also maximum under T₇.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1419 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments did not significantly affect test weight or harvest index.

Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
test weight and harvest indexe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, test weight and harvest index were not significantly affected by the treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1420–1509 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–98 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend thorough large-scale investigation to raise cereal grain yield.

Taxon
cerealse0
Outcome
a thorough, large-scale investigatione0

Verbatim

e0

“a thorough, large-scale investigation is a good goal for raising grain yield in cereals.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1798–1886 · show in text ↑

boron atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

76 papers: 62 positive, 14 negative or no effect

61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

72 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

iron atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

99 papers: 92 positive, 7 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

95 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.