Paper · 2025 · Plant Science Today

Influence of tillage and herbicide strategies on weed dynamics and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) performance in saline soils of Northern India

M Vaheed; C Bhushan; S K Verma; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during the rabi season of 2019-20 at the Agronomy Research Farm, Acharya Narendra Deva University of Agriculture and Technology, Kumarganj, Ayodhya, to assess the effects of tillage and herbicide combinations on weed dynamics, crop growth and wheat yield under saline soil conditions. The study involved 15 treatment combinations arranged in a splitplot design (SPD) with three replications. The main plots included three tillage operations: T0-zero tillage (ZT), T1-minimum tillage (MT) and T2-conventional tillage (CT). The sub-plots consisted of five weed management treatments: pendimethalin 1.5 kg active ingredient/ha (pre-emergence), pendimethalin 1.0 kg active ingredient/ha (pre-emergence) followed by sulfosulfuron (SFS) at 0.025 kg active ingredient/ha (post-emergence), SFS + metsulfuron-methyl (MSM) at 0.032 kg active ingredient/ha (post-emergence), a weedy check and a weed-free control. The results revealed that ZT significantly reduced weed density and dry weight while enhancing weedcontrol efficiency (WCE) compared to MT and CT. Among the herbicide treatments, the sequential application of pendimethalin (1.0 kg active ingredient/ha) followed by SFS (0.025 kg active ingredient/ha) was the most effective in suppressing weed growth and improving WCE and enhancing crop growth and yield. This treatment was statistically on par with the SFS + MSM application. The combination of ZT with pendimethalin followed by SFS (T0W2) recorded the lowest weed infestation and the highest values for plant height, dry matter accumulation, tillers per m row length and grain yield. This was closely followed by the ZT combined with SFS +MSM treatment (T0W3), highlighting the synergistic benefits of conservation tillage and sequential herbicide application.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage reduced weed density and dry weight versus minimum and conventional tillage.

Treatment
ZTe0
Outcome
weed density and dry weighte0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
MT and CTe0

Not reportedInteractor

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ZT significantly reduced weed density and dry weight while enhancing weedcontrol efficiency (WCE) compared to MT and CT.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1082 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage enhanced weed control efficiency.

Treatment
ZTe0
Outcome
weedcontrol efficiencye0
Direction
enhancinge0
Comparator
MT and CTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ZT significantly reduced weed density and dry weight while enhancing weedcontrol efficiency (WCE) compared to MT and CT.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1082 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sequential pendimethalin and SFS suppressed weed growth and improved weed control efficiency.

Treatment
sequential application of pendimethalin (1.0 kg active ingredient/ha) followed by SFS (0.025 kg active ingredient/ha)e0
Outcome
weed growth and improving WCEe0
Direction
suppressinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the sequential application of pendimethalin (1.0 kg active ingredient/ha) followed by SFS (0.025 kg active ingredient/ha) was the most effective in suppressing weed growth and improving WCE and enhancing crop growth and yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1341 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sequential pendimethalin and SFS enhanced crop growth and yield.

Treatment
sequential application of pendimethalin (1.0 kg active ingredient/ha) followed by SFS (0.025 kg active ingredient/ha)e0
Outcome
crop growth and yielde0
Direction
enhancinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the sequential application of pendimethalin (1.0 kg active ingredient/ha) followed by SFS (0.025 kg active ingredient/ha) was the most effective in suppressing weed growth and improving WCE and enhancing crop growth and yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1341 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sequential treatment performed statistically on par with SFS and MSM.

Treatment
This treatmente0
Outcome
statistically on pare0
Direction
on pare0
Comparator
SFS + MSM applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This treatment was statistically on par with the SFS + MSM application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1342–1413 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage plus sequential herbicide produced lowest weed infestation.

Treatment
ZT with pendimethalin followed by SFS (T0W2)e0
Outcome
weed infestatione0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combination of ZT with pendimethalin followed by SFS (T0W2) recorded the lowest weed infestation and the highest values for plant height, dry matter accumulation, tillers per m row length and grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1414–1622 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage plus sequential herbicide produced highest height, dry matter, tillers and yield.

Treatment
ZT with pendimethalin followed by SFS (T0W2)e0
Outcome
plant height, dry matter accumulation, tillers per m row length and grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combination of ZT with pendimethalin followed by SFS (T0W2) recorded the lowest weed infestation and the highest values for plant height, dry matter accumulation, tillers per m row length and grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1414–1622 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage plus SFS and MSM followed the best combination closely.

Treatment
ZT combined with SFS +MSM treatment (T0W3)e0
Outcome
closely followede0
Direction
closely followede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This was closely followed by the ZT combined with SFS +MSM treatment (T0W3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1623–1698 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑

pendimethalin · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

66 papers: 57 positive, 9 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

pendimethalin · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 46 positive, 2 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

tillage · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

183 papers: 126 positive, 57 negative or no effect

125 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

179 papers more in this group

See all 183 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.