Paper · 2025 · Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi mitigated nitrogen leaching by enhancing soil nitrogen retention in Camellia oleifera Abel. soils

Fei Wu; Ziran Ma; Tuanjie Che; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

ABSTRACT Nitrogen leaching is a major pathway of nitrogen fertilizer loss. Although arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi are known to reduce nitrogen leaching by improving plant nitrogen uptake, the soil-based mechanisms remain unclear. A pot experiment was conducted using a randomized complete block design, with four nitrogen levels (0, 3.75, 7.5, and 15 mM) and two AM fungal inoculation treatments. The study evaluated plant nitrogen uptake, hyphal length density, glomalin-related soil protein (GRSP) content, soil aggregation, soil nitrogen content, and nitrogen leaching loss in Camellia oleifera soils. Results showed that both NH 4 + -N and NO 3 − -N in leachate increased with increasing nitrogen application. AM fungi reduced NH 4 + -N (by 19.04% and 44.96%) and total nitrogen (TN, by 20.74% and 24.70%) in the leachate under high nitrogen conditions (7.5 and 15 mM). Under high nitrogen levels, AM fungi significantly increased soil easily extractable and total GRSP contents, NO 3 − -N, TN, and the proportion of 0.05–1.00 mm aggregates, while reducing soil dissolved total nitrogen (DTN) content, and the proportion of 0.002–0.05 mm aggregates. Redundancy analysis (RDA) showed that hyphal length density, DTN, soil NH 4 + -N, NO 3 − -N, and aggregate distribution were strongly associated with nitrogen leaching. Partial least squares path modeling indicated that soil DTN explained 96% of the variation in nitrogen leaching; AM fungi likely reduce soil DTN through increased soil aggregation via GRSP secretion and direct nitrogen absorption by extraradical hyphae. These findings highlight that changes in soil structure play a key role in reducing nutrient loss mediated by AM fungi. IMPORTANCE Nitrogen fertilizers are essential for crop productivity, but low nitrogen use efficiency remains a major challenge in agriculture. Nitrogen leaching is a key contributor to nitrogen loss. Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi are known to reduce fertilizer loss by enhancing nitrogen uptake in host plants. This study explored how AM fungi affect nitrogen leaching, plant nitrogen uptake, hyphal development, glomalin-related soil protein (GRSP) production, soil aggregation, and soil nitrogen content in Camellia oleifera soils. The results show that AM fungi can reduce nitrogen in soluble form and subsequently decrease nitrogen leaching, not only by facilitating nitrogen uptake via extraradical hyphae but also by altering soil structure—especially by promoting aggregate formation through the secretion of GRSP. The findings underscore that the functional significance of AM fungi should not be limited to their interactions with plant components, as their role in soil amelioration is equally important.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM fungi reduced NH4+-N in leachate by 19.04% and 44.96% under high nitrogen (7.5 and 15 mM) in Camellia oleifera soils

Taxon
Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferae0
Treatment
AM fungie1
Interactor
AM fungiGlomeromycotae1symbiont
Outcome
NH 4 + -Ne1
Direction
reducede1
Value
19.04% and 44.96%e1
Qualifier
under high nitrogen conditions (7.5 and 15 mM)e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The study evaluated plant nitrogen uptake, hyphal length density, glomalin-related soil protein (GRSP) content, soil aggregation, soil nitrogen content, and nitrogen leaching loss in Camellia oleifera soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–607 · show in text ↑
e1

“AM fungi reduced NH 4 + -N (by 19.04% and 44.96%) and total nitrogen (TN, by 20.74% and 24.70%) in the leachate under high nitrogen conditions (7.5 and 15 mM)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–876 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM fungi reduced total nitrogen in leachate by 20.74% and 24.70% under high nitrogen (7.5 and 15 mM) in Camellia oleifera soils

Taxon
Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferae0
Treatment
AM fungie1
Interactor
AM fungiGlomeromycotae1symbiont
Outcome
total nitrogene1
Direction
reducede1
Value
20.74% and 24.70%e1
Qualifier
under high nitrogen conditions (7.5 and 15 mM)e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The study evaluated plant nitrogen uptake, hyphal length density, glomalin-related soil protein (GRSP) content, soil aggregation, soil nitrogen content, and nitrogen leaching loss in Camellia oleifera soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–607 · show in text ↑
e1

“AM fungi reduced NH 4 + -N (by 19.04% and 44.96%) and total nitrogen (TN, by 20.74% and 24.70%) in the leachate under high nitrogen conditions (7.5 and 15 mM)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–876 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under high nitrogen, AM fungi significantly increased soil easily extractable and total GRSP contents in Camellia oleifera soils

Taxon
Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferae0
Treatment
AM fungie2
Interactor
AM fungiGlomeromycotae2symbiont
Outcome
soil easily extractable and total GRSP contentse2
Direction
increasede2
Qualifier
Under high nitrogen levelse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The study evaluated plant nitrogen uptake, hyphal length density, glomalin-related soil protein (GRSP) content, soil aggregation, soil nitrogen content, and nitrogen leaching loss in Camellia oleifera soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–607 · show in text ↑
e2

“Under high nitrogen levels, AM fungi significantly increased soil easily extractable and total GRSP contents, NO 3 − -N, TN, and the proportion of 0.05–1.00 mm aggregates, while reducing soil dissolved total nitrogen (DTN) content, and the proportion of 0.002–0.05 mm aggregates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–1156 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under high nitrogen, AM fungi significantly increased the proportion of 0.05–1.00 mm soil aggregates

Taxon
Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferae0
Treatment
AM fungie2
Interactor
AM fungiGlomeromycotae2symbiont
Outcome
the proportion of 0.05–1.00 mm aggregatese2
Direction
increasede2
Qualifier
Under high nitrogen levelse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The study evaluated plant nitrogen uptake, hyphal length density, glomalin-related soil protein (GRSP) content, soil aggregation, soil nitrogen content, and nitrogen leaching loss in Camellia oleifera soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–607 · show in text ↑
e2

“Under high nitrogen levels, AM fungi significantly increased soil easily extractable and total GRSP contents, NO 3 − -N, TN, and the proportion of 0.05–1.00 mm aggregates, while reducing soil dissolved total nitrogen (DTN) content, and the proportion of 0.002–0.05 mm aggregates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–1156 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under high nitrogen, AM fungi reduced soil dissolved total nitrogen (DTN) content and the proportion of 0.002–0.05 mm aggregates in Camellia oleifera soils

Taxon
Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferae0
Treatment
AM fungie2
Interactor
AM fungiGlomeromycotae2symbiont
Outcome
soil dissolved total nitrogen (DTN) content, and the proportion of 0.002–0.05 mm aggregatese2
Direction
reducinge2
Qualifier
Under high nitrogen levelse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The study evaluated plant nitrogen uptake, hyphal length density, glomalin-related soil protein (GRSP) content, soil aggregation, soil nitrogen content, and nitrogen leaching loss in Camellia oleifera soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–607 · show in text ↑
e2

“Under high nitrogen levels, AM fungi significantly increased soil easily extractable and total GRSP contents, NO 3 − -N, TN, and the proportion of 0.05–1.00 mm aggregates, while reducing soil dissolved total nitrogen (DTN) content, and the proportion of 0.002–0.05 mm aggregates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–1156 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hyphal length density, DTN, soil NH4+-N, NO3--N and aggregate distribution were strongly associated with nitrogen leaching in Camellia oleifera soils

Taxon
Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferae0
Compound
DTNe3
Outcome
nitrogen leachinge3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The study evaluated plant nitrogen uptake, hyphal length density, glomalin-related soil protein (GRSP) content, soil aggregation, soil nitrogen content, and nitrogen leaching loss in Camellia oleifera soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–607 · show in text ↑
e3

“Redundancy analysis (RDA) showed that hyphal length density, DTN, soil NH 4 + -N, NO 3 − -N, and aggregate distribution were strongly associated with nitrogen leaching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1158–1325 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Soil DTN explained 96% of the variation in nitrogen leaching in a partial least squares path model

Taxon
Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferae0
Compound
DTNe4
Outcome
variation in nitrogen leachinge4
Value
96%e4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The study evaluated plant nitrogen uptake, hyphal length density, glomalin-related soil protein (GRSP) content, soil aggregation, soil nitrogen content, and nitrogen leaching loss in Camellia oleifera soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–607 · show in text ↑
e4

“Partial least squares path modeling indicated that soil DTN explained 96% of the variation in nitrogen leaching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1327–1438 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

AM fungi likely reduce soil DTN through increased soil aggregation via GRSP secretion and direct nitrogen absorption by extraradical hyphae

Taxon
Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferae0
Interactor
AM fungiGlomeromycotae5symbiont
Gene
GRSPe5
Outcome
soil DTNe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The study evaluated plant nitrogen uptake, hyphal length density, glomalin-related soil protein (GRSP) content, soil aggregation, soil nitrogen content, and nitrogen leaching loss in Camellia oleifera soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–607 · show in text ↑
e5

“AM fungi likely reduce soil DTN through increased soil aggregation via GRSP secretion and direct nitrogen absorption by extraradical hyphae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1440–1579 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both NH4+-N and NO3--N in leachate increased with increasing nitrogen application in Camellia oleifera soils

Taxon
Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferae0
Treatment
increasing nitrogen applicatione6
Outcome
NH 4 + -N and NO 3 − -N in leachatee6
Direction
increasede6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The study evaluated plant nitrogen uptake, hyphal length density, glomalin-related soil protein (GRSP) content, soil aggregation, soil nitrogen content, and nitrogen leaching loss in Camellia oleifera soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–607 · show in text ↑
e6

“Results showed that both NH 4 + -N and NO 3 − -N in leachate increased with increasing nitrogen application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–716 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · Glomeromycota · Camellia oleifera (tea-oil Camellia)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.