Paper · 2025 · Egyptian Academic Journal of Biological Sciences, H. Botany/Egyptian Academic Journal of Biological Sciences, H. Botany

Evaluation of Bacillus subtilis As a Biocontrol Agent Against Viral Pathogens in Faba Bean (Vicia faba)

Ibrahim N. A. M. Noah; Ahmed H. Zeid; Hosny A. Younis; et al.

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Two field experiments were carried out at The Faculty of Agriculture (Saba Basha), Alexandria University, Egypt during 2023/2024 and 2024/2025 seasons to assess the effectiveness of Bacillus subtilis as a biological control agent in reducing the incidence and severity of viral infections (BYMV) in faba bean and its effects on vegetative growth. The experiment was conducted in a greenhouse over two consecutive seasons using a randomized complete block design (RCBD) in three replicates, with foliar application of B. subtilis at concentrations of 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 g/L, along with a control significantly improved the vegetative growth and yield of faba bean, especially when applied before viral infection. The 1.5 g/L pre-infection treatment resulted in the highest level of effectiveness among all treatments. The results indicated that foliar application of B. subtilis extract increased values in plant height, number of pods, and pod weight during both seasons, suggesting strong preventive effects. In contrast, virus-infected plants without treatment had the lowest performance across all traits. Treatments applied for post- infection gave moderate improvements but were less effective than preventive applications. These findings highlight the role of B. subtilis as a biocontrol agent that enhances plant immunity and growth under stress. It is recommended to apply B. subtilis preventively at 1.5 g/L for optimal protection and productivity in faba bean cultivation. ELISA is a sensitive and reliable technique used to detect viral infections in plants by measuring viral protein concentrations. It helps evaluate the effectiveness of biological treatments in reducing virus presence

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar application of Bacillus subtilis at 0.5 to 2.0 g/L compared with a control improved the vegetative growth and yield of faba bean, especially when applied before viral infection.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae1
Treatment
foliar application of B. subtilis at concentrations of 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 g/Le2
Interactor
BYMVBean yellow mosaic viruse3pathogen
Second interactor
B. subtilisBacillus subtilise2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
vegetative growth and yielde1
Direction
improvede1
Comparator
a controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bean yellow mosaic virus
Bean yellow mosaic virus · InteractorDr. Parthasarathy Seethapathy, Amrita School of Agricultural Sciences, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · Second interactorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Faba Bean (Vicia faba)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“along with a control significantly improved the vegetative growth and yield of faba bean, especially when applied before viral infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–714 · show in text ↑
e2

“foliar application of B. subtilis at concentrations of 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 g/L”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–576 · show in text ↑
e3

“viral infections (BYMV)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–295 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1.5 g/L pre-infection treatment resulted in the highest level of effectiveness among all treatments in faba bean.

Taxon
Faba BeanVicia fabat0
Treatment
1.5 g/L pre-infection treatmente1
Outcome
level of effectivenesse1
Direction
higheste1
Comparator
all treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Faba Bean (Vicia faba)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“The 1.5 g/L pre-infection treatment resulted in the highest level of effectiveness among all treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–819 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar application of B. subtilis extract increased plant height, number of pods and pod weight of faba bean during both seasons.

Taxon
Faba BeanVicia fabat0
Treatment
foliar application of B. subtilis extracte1
Interactor
B. subtilisBacillus subtilise1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
plant height, number of pods, and pod weighte1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Faba Bean (Vicia faba)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“foliar application of B. subtilis extract increased values in plant height, number of pods, and pod weight during both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–974 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Virus-infected faba bean plants without treatment had the lowest performance across all traits.

Taxon
Faba BeanVicia fabat0
Outcome
performance across all traitse1
Direction
loweste1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Faba Bean (Vicia faba)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“virus-infected plants without treatment had the lowest performance across all traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Post-infection treatments gave moderate improvements in faba bean but were less effective than preventive applications.

Taxon
Faba BeanVicia fabat0
Treatment
Treatments applied for post- infectione1
Outcome
moderate improvementse1
Direction
less effectivee1
Comparator
preventive applicationse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Faba Bean (Vicia faba)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“Treatments applied for post- infection gave moderate improvements but were less effective than preventive applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1231 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend applying B. subtilis preventively at 1.5 g/L for optimal protection and productivity in faba bean cultivation.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae1
Outcome
optimal protection and productivitye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Faba Bean (Vicia faba)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“It is recommended to apply B. subtilis preventively at 1.5 g/L for optimal protection and productivity in faba bean cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1358–1485 · show in text ↑

Bacillus subtilis · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

116 papers: 110 positive, 6 negative or no effect

109 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

application · Bean yellow mosaic virus · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

botanical · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

28 papers: 28 positive, 0 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.