Paper · 2025 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Silicon application enhances drought resilience in buckwheat: a comparative study of three varieties

Jiri Krucky; Vaclav Hejnak; Pavla Vachova; et al.

20
claims
45
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study evaluated the effects of foliar silicon (Si) application on physiological and biochemical traits in three buckwheat lines (La Harpe, Panda, Smuga) grown under optimal (control) and drought stress conditions. Plants were cultivated under controlled conditions with four treatments: Control (80% water availability), Drought (40%), Control + Si, and Drought + Si (0.5 mM Na 2 SiO 3 ·9H 2 O applied to foliage). Water stress significantly reduced relative leaf water content (RWC), osmotic potential (Ψ s ), photosynthetic pigments, and gas exchange parameters ( A , E , g s ) in all varieties. It also increased malondialdehyde (MDA), total flavonoid content (TFC), total antioxidant capacity (TAC), and 5-methylcytosine (5mC), while Fv/Fm remained unchanged, indicating sustained photosystem II activity. However, varietal differences were evident. La Harpe and Panda showed lower RWC, Ψ s , A , E , and g s under drought than Smuga. La Harpe had the highest MDA accumulation in roots, increased 5mC levels in leaves, and was the only line with decreased water use efficiency (WUE). Smuga exhibited the highest natural proline level and the strongest proline increase under drought. Foliar Si application reduced MDA and enhanced antioxidant activity (TFC, TAC) in both roots and leaves across all varieties, under both water regimes. The strongest antioxidant response was observed in La Harpe. Si also improved photosynthetic pigment levels, likely contributing to the protection of the photosynthetic apparatus under drought stress. Its effects on RWC, Ψ s , and gas exchange under drought were variety-specific: La Harpe and Panda responded positively, while Smuga showed minimal changes. Group correlation analysis under drought showed that Smuga had the strongest positive correlations between plant health traits and stress responses, suggesting effective physiological coordination. Panda showed moderate, and La Harpe negative, correlations. After Si application, these relationships improved most in Smuga, moderately in Panda, and least in La Harpe. Overall, the results reveal clear genotype-specific responses to foliar-applied Si in buckwheat. Silicon improved antioxidant defenses, mitigated drought-induced oxidative stress, and supported physiological functions, particularly in Smuga. These findings support using Si as a promising tool to enhance drought resilience in buckwheat cultivation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought significantly reduced leaf water status, pigments, and gas exchange across varieties.

Taxon
buckwheatt0
Treatment
Water stresse0
Outcome
relative leaf water content (RWC), osmotic potential (Ψ s ), photosynthetic pigments, and gas exchange parameters ( A , E , g s )e0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
optimal (control)e1

Verbatim

e0

“Water stress significantly reduced relative leaf water content (RWC), osmotic potential (Ψ s ), photosynthetic pigments, and gas exchange parameters ( A , E , g s ) in all varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–601 · show in text ↑
t0

“Silicon application enhances drought resilience in buckwheat: a comparative study of three varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–100 · show in text ↑
e1

“grown under optimal (control) and drought stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–217 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought increased MDA, TFC, TAC, and 5mC across varieties.

Taxon
buckwheatt0
Treatment
drought stresse1
Outcome
malondialdehyde (MDA), total flavonoid content (TFC), total antioxidant capacity (TAC), and 5-methylcytosine (5mC)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“It also increased malondialdehyde (MDA), total flavonoid content (TFC), total antioxidant capacity (TAC), and 5-methylcytosine (5mC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–735 · show in text ↑
t0

“Silicon application enhances drought resilience in buckwheat: a comparative study of three varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–100 · show in text ↑
e1

“grown under optimal (control) and drought stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–217 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fv/Fm remained unchanged under drought.

Taxon
buckwheatt0
Treatment
drought stresse1
Outcome
Fv/Fme0
Direction
unchangede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Fv/Fm remained unchanged, indicating sustained photosystem II activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–813 · show in text ↑
t0

“Silicon application enhances drought resilience in buckwheat: a comparative study of three varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–100 · show in text ↑
e1

“grown under optimal (control) and drought stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–217 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought, La Harpe had lower water status and gas exchange than Smuga.

Taxon
buckwheatt0
Material
La Harpee0
Outcome
RWC, Ψ s , A , E , and g se0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
Smugae0

Verbatim

e0

“La Harpe and Panda showed lower RWC, Ψ s , A , E , and g s under drought than Smuga”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–942 · show in text ↑
t0

“buckwheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–60 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought, Panda had lower water status and gas exchange than Smuga.

Taxon
buckwheatt0
Material
Pandae0
Outcome
RWC, Ψ s , A , E , and g se0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
Smugae0

Verbatim

e0

“La Harpe and Panda showed lower RWC, Ψ s , A , E , and g s under drought than Smuga”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–942 · show in text ↑
t0

“buckwheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–60 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

La Harpe had the highest root MDA accumulation.

Taxon
buckwheatt0
Material
La Harpee0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Outcome
MDA accumulatione0
Direction
higheste0

Verbatim

e0

“La Harpe had the highest MDA accumulation in roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–994 · show in text ↑
t0

“buckwheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–60 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

La Harpe showed increased leaf 5mC.

Taxon
buckwheatt0
Material
La Harpee1
Organ / stage
leavese0
Outcome
5mC levelse0
Direction
increasede0

Verbatim

e0

“increased 5mC levels in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1026 · show in text ↑
t0

“Silicon application enhances drought resilience in buckwheat: a comparative study of three varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–100 · show in text ↑
e1

“La Harpe had the highest MDA accumulation in roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–994 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

La Harpe was the only line with reduced WUE.

Taxon
buckwheatt0
Material
La Harpee1
Outcome
water use efficiency (WUE)e0
Direction
decreasede0

Verbatim

e0

“was the only line with decreased water use efficiency (WUE)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1091 · show in text ↑
t0

“Silicon application enhances drought resilience in buckwheat: a comparative study of three varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–100 · show in text ↑
e1

“La Harpe had the highest MDA accumulation in roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–994 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Smuga had the highest baseline proline level.

Taxon
buckwheatt0
Material
Smugae0
Outcome
natural proline levele0
Direction
higheste0

Verbatim

e0

“Smuga exhibited the highest natural proline level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1142 · show in text ↑
t0

“buckwheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Smuga had the strongest proline increase under drought.

Taxon
buckwheatt0
Material
Smugae0
Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
prolinee0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Smuga exhibited the highest natural proline level and the strongest proline increase under drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1191 · show in text ↑
t0

“buckwheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar silicon reduced MDA across tissues, varieties, and water regimes.

Taxon
buckwheatt0
Treatment
Foliar Si applicatione0
Outcome
MDAe0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
both roots and leaves across all varieties, under both water regimese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar Si application reduced MDA and enhanced antioxidant activity (TFC, TAC) in both roots and leaves across all varieties, under both water regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1343 · show in text ↑
t0

“buckwheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar silicon enhanced TFC and TAC antioxidant activity across tissues, varieties, and water regimes.

Taxon
buckwheatt0
Treatment
Foliar Si applicatione0
Outcome
antioxidant activity (TFC, TAC)e0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar Si application reduced MDA and enhanced antioxidant activity (TFC, TAC) in both roots and leaves across all varieties, under both water regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1343 · show in text ↑
t0

“buckwheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–60 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

La Harpe had the strongest antioxidant response to silicon.

Taxon
buckwheatt0
Material
La Harpee0
Outcome
antioxidant responsee0
Direction
strongeste0

Verbatim

e0

“The strongest antioxidant response was observed in La Harpe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1345–1404 · show in text ↑
t0

“buckwheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon improved photosynthetic pigment levels.

Taxon
buckwheatt0
Treatment
Sie0
Outcome
photosynthetic pigment levelse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Si also improved photosynthetic pigment levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1406–1452 · show in text ↑
t0

“buckwheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought, silicon improved water status and gas exchange in La Harpe.

Taxon
buckwheatt0
Material
La Harpee0
Treatment
Sit0
Outcome
RWC, Ψ s , and gas exchangee0
Direction
positivelye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Its effects on RWC, Ψ s , and gas exchange under drought were variety-specific: La Harpe and Panda responded positively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1546–1665 · show in text ↑
t0

“Silicon application enhances drought resilience in buckwheat: a comparative study of three varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought, silicon improved water status and gas exchange in Panda.

Taxon
buckwheatt0
Material
Pandae0
Treatment
Sit0
Outcome
RWC, Ψ s , and gas exchangee0
Direction
positivelye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Its effects on RWC, Ψ s , and gas exchange under drought were variety-specific: La Harpe and Panda responded positively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1546–1665 · show in text ↑
t0

“Silicon application enhances drought resilience in buckwheat: a comparative study of three varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought, silicon produced minimal changes in Smuga water status and gas exchange.

Taxon
buckwheatt0
Material
Smugae0
Treatment
Sit0
Outcome
RWC, Ψ s , and gas exchangee1
Direction
minimal changese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“while Smuga showed minimal changes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1667–1701 · show in text ↑
t0

“Silicon application enhances drought resilience in buckwheat: a comparative study of three varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–100 · show in text ↑
e1

“Its effects on RWC, Ψ s , and gas exchange under drought were variety-specific: La Harpe and Panda responded positively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1546–1665 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought, Smuga had the strongest positive trait correlations; Panda moderate and La Harpe negative.

Taxon
buckwheatt0
Material
Smugae0
Outcome
correlations between plant health traits and stress responsese0
Qualifier
strongest positive correlationse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Smuga had the strongest positive correlations between plant health traits and stress responses, suggesting effective physiological coordination. Panda showed moderate, and La Harpe negative, correlations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1756–1959 · show in text ↑
t0

“buckwheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After silicon, the trait correlations improved most in Smuga.

Taxon
buckwheatt0
Material
Smugae0
Treatment
Si applicatione0
Outcome
relationshipse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“After Si application, these relationships improved most in Smuga, moderately in Panda, and least in La Harpe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1961–2069 · show in text ↑
t0

“buckwheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–60 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors support silicon as a tool for improving drought resilience in buckwheat cultivation.

Taxon
buckwheate0
Treatment
Sie0
Outcome
enhance drought resiliencee0

Verbatim

e0

“These findings support using Si as a promising tool to enhance drought resilience in buckwheat cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2313–2419 · show in text ↑

silicon atom · physiology: oxidative · Fagopyrum esculentum (common buckwheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

silicon atom · physiology: water · Fagopyrum esculentum (common buckwheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

silicon atom · physiology: photosynthesis · Fagopyrum esculentum (common buckwheat)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

drought · physiology: water · Fagopyrum esculentum (common buckwheat)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Fagopyrum esculentum (common buckwheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 2 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

application · quality: phytochemicals · Fagopyrum esculentum (common buckwheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · physiology: oxidative · Fagopyrum esculentum (common buckwheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.