Paper · 2026 · Journal of Environmental Management

Deciphering silicon-induced resilience to drought and waterlogging stress in Fagopyrum esculentum Moench: Physiological adaptations during stress and recovery

Md. Rakib Hossain Raihan; Mar Albert-Saiz; Marian Brestic; et al.

20
claims
42
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study explored the mitigating effect of silicon (Si) on drought- and waterlogging-induced stresses in common buckwheat. Twenty-day-old plants were subjected to 15 days of drought or waterlogging followed by a 15-day recovery. Silicon was applied twice via foliar spray. Both stresses significantly reduced plant growth: height, fresh weight, and dry weight decreased by 54–62% under drought and 46–74% under waterlogging. Silicon supplementation significantly mitigated these reductions. During recovery, Si-treated plants exhibited further improvements: with height increasing by 5–7%, fresh weight by 18–34%, and dry weight by 30–33% under drought and waterlogging, respectively. Stress also impaired physiological status. Relative water content (RWC) decreased by 33% (drought) and 37% (waterlogging), while electrolyte leakage (EL) increased by 44% and 39%, respectively. Silicon maintained higher RWC (by 23–25%) and reduced EL (by 23–36%), indicating improved cellular integrity. Gas exchange parameters declined sharply with photosynthetic rate (P n ) decreasing by 84–98%, stomatal conductance (g s ) by 66–75%, and transpiration rate (T r ) by 65–86% under both stresses but improved with Si application during recovery (P n by 4–65%, g s by 60–65%, T r by 96–245%). Fluorescence transients revealed higher PSII disruption under waterlogging (evidenced by positive K-band) than drought. Silicon application suppressed K-band formation and restored PSII efficiency. Overall, Si alleviated drought- and waterlogging-induced stress, accelerated recovery, and enhanced photosynthetic performance in buckwheat. These findings indicate that Si supplementation could serve as a valuable approach for strengthening plant resilience in environments prone to extreme moisture fluctuations. • Silicon improves plants gas exchange, water balance, and photosynthetic efficiency. • Silicon protects photosystem II function and enhances chlorophyll fluorescence. • Silicon supplementation boosts drought and waterlogging stress tolerance in plants. • Silicon-treated plants show faster post-stress recovery and improved growth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced buckwheat height, fresh weight, and dry weight by 54–62%.

Taxon
common buckwheatFagopyrum esculentume1
Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
height, fresh weight, and dry weighte0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
54–62%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagopyrum esculentum
Fagopyrum esculentum · TaxonSAplants · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both stresses significantly reduced plant growth: height, fresh weight, and dry weight decreased by 54–62% under drought and 46–74% under waterlogging.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 275–426 · show in text ↑
e1

“common buckwheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging reduced buckwheat height, fresh weight, and dry weight by 46–74%.

Taxon
common buckwheatFagopyrum esculentume1
Treatment
waterlogginge0
Outcome
height, fresh weight, and dry weighte0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
46–74%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagopyrum esculentum
Fagopyrum esculentum · TaxonSAplants · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both stresses significantly reduced plant growth: height, fresh weight, and dry weight decreased by 54–62% under drought and 46–74% under waterlogging.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 275–426 · show in text ↑
e1

“common buckwheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon significantly mitigated drought and waterlogging reductions in buckwheat growth.

Taxon
common buckwheatFagopyrum esculentume1
Treatment
Silicon supplementatione0
Outcome
these reductionse0
Direction
mitigatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagopyrum esculentum
Fagopyrum esculentum · TaxonSAplants · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Silicon supplementation significantly mitigated these reductions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–492 · show in text ↑
e1

“common buckwheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

During recovery with silicon, buckwheat height increased by 5–7%.

Taxon
common buckwheatFagopyrum esculentume1
Treatment
Si-treatede0
Outcome
heighte0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
5–7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagopyrum esculentum
Fagopyrum esculentum · TaxonSAplants · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During recovery, Si-treated plants exhibited further improvements: with height increasing by 5–7%, fresh weight by 18–34%, and dry weight by 30–33% under drought and waterlogging, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–686 · show in text ↑
e1

“common buckwheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

During recovery with silicon, buckwheat fresh weight increased by 18–34%.

Taxon
common buckwheatFagopyrum esculentume1
Treatment
Si-treatede0
Outcome
fresh weighte0
Direction
improvementse0
Value
18–34%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagopyrum esculentum
Fagopyrum esculentum · TaxonSAplants · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During recovery, Si-treated plants exhibited further improvements: with height increasing by 5–7%, fresh weight by 18–34%, and dry weight by 30–33% under drought and waterlogging, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–686 · show in text ↑
e1

“common buckwheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

During recovery with silicon, buckwheat dry weight increased by 30–33%.

Taxon
common buckwheatFagopyrum esculentume1
Treatment
Si-treatede0
Outcome
dry weighte0
Direction
improvementse0
Value
30–33%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagopyrum esculentum
Fagopyrum esculentum · TaxonSAplants · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During recovery, Si-treated plants exhibited further improvements: with height increasing by 5–7%, fresh weight by 18–34%, and dry weight by 30–33% under drought and waterlogging, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–686 · show in text ↑
e1

“common buckwheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced buckwheat relative water content by 33%.

Taxon
common buckwheatFagopyrum esculentume1
Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
Relative water content (RWC)e0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
33%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagopyrum esculentum
Fagopyrum esculentum · TaxonSAplants · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Relative water content (RWC) decreased by 33% (drought) and 37% (waterlogging)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–808 · show in text ↑
e1

“common buckwheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging reduced buckwheat relative water content by 37%.

Taxon
common buckwheatFagopyrum esculentume1
Treatment
waterlogginge0
Outcome
Relative water content (RWC)e0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
37%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagopyrum esculentum
Fagopyrum esculentum · TaxonSAplants · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Relative water content (RWC) decreased by 33% (drought) and 37% (waterlogging)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–808 · show in text ↑
e1

“common buckwheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought increased buckwheat electrolyte leakage by 44%.

Taxon
common buckwheatFagopyrum esculentume1
Treatment
droughte2
Outcome
electrolyte leakage (EL)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
44%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagopyrum esculentum
Fagopyrum esculentum · TaxonSAplants · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“electrolyte leakage (EL) increased by 44% and 39%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–880 · show in text ↑
e1

“common buckwheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–123 · show in text ↑
e2

“33% (drought) and 37% (waterlogging)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–808 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging increased buckwheat electrolyte leakage by 39%.

Taxon
common buckwheatFagopyrum esculentume1
Treatment
waterlogginge2
Outcome
electrolyte leakage (EL)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
39%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagopyrum esculentum
Fagopyrum esculentum · TaxonSAplants · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“electrolyte leakage (EL) increased by 44% and 39%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–880 · show in text ↑
e1

“common buckwheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–123 · show in text ↑
e2

“37% (waterlogging)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–808 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon maintained 23–25% higher relative water content in stressed buckwheat.

Taxon
common buckwheatFagopyrum esculentume1
Treatment
Silicone0
Outcome
RWCe0
Direction
highere0
Value
23–25%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagopyrum esculentum
Fagopyrum esculentum · TaxonSAplants · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Silicon maintained higher RWC (by 23–25%) and reduced EL (by 23–36%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–949 · show in text ↑
e1

“common buckwheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon reduced electrolyte leakage by 23–36% in stressed buckwheat.

Taxon
common buckwheatFagopyrum esculentume1
Treatment
Silicone0
Outcome
ELe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
23–36%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagopyrum esculentum
Fagopyrum esculentum · TaxonSAplants · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Silicon maintained higher RWC (by 23–25%) and reduced EL (by 23–36%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–949 · show in text ↑
e1

“common buckwheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought and waterlogging, buckwheat photosynthetic rate declined by 84–98%.

Taxon
common buckwheatFagopyrum esculentume1
Treatment
both stressese0
Outcome
photosynthetic rate (P n )e0
Direction
decreasinge0
Value
84–98%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagopyrum esculentum
Fagopyrum esculentum · TaxonSAplants · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gas exchange parameters declined sharply with photosynthetic rate (P n ) decreasing by 84–98%, stomatal conductance (g s ) by 66–75%, and transpiration rate (T r ) by 65–86% under both stresses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1184 · show in text ↑
e1

“common buckwheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought and waterlogging, buckwheat stomatal conductance declined by 66–75%.

Taxon
common buckwheatFagopyrum esculentume1
Treatment
both stressese0
Outcome
stomatal conductance (g s )e0
Direction
declinede0
Value
66–75%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagopyrum esculentum
Fagopyrum esculentum · TaxonSAplants · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gas exchange parameters declined sharply with photosynthetic rate (P n ) decreasing by 84–98%, stomatal conductance (g s ) by 66–75%, and transpiration rate (T r ) by 65–86% under both stresses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1184 · show in text ↑
e1

“common buckwheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought and waterlogging, buckwheat transpiration rate declined by 65–86%.

Taxon
common buckwheatFagopyrum esculentume1
Treatment
both stressese0
Outcome
transpiration rate (T r )e0
Direction
declinede0
Value
65–86%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagopyrum esculentum
Fagopyrum esculentum · TaxonSAplants · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gas exchange parameters declined sharply with photosynthetic rate (P n ) decreasing by 84–98%, stomatal conductance (g s ) by 66–75%, and transpiration rate (T r ) by 65–86% under both stresses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1184 · show in text ↑
e1

“common buckwheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

During recovery, silicon improved buckwheat photosynthetic rate by 4–65%.

Taxon
common buckwheatFagopyrum esculentume1
Treatment
Si applicatione0
Outcome
P ne0
Direction
improvede0
Value
4–65%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagopyrum esculentum
Fagopyrum esculentum · TaxonSAplants · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“improved with Si application during recovery (P n by 4–65%, g s by 60–65%, T r by 96–245%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1189–1279 · show in text ↑
e1

“common buckwheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

During recovery, silicon improved buckwheat stomatal conductance by 60–65%.

Taxon
common buckwheatFagopyrum esculentume1
Treatment
Si applicatione0
Outcome
g se0
Direction
improvede0
Value
60–65%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagopyrum esculentum
Fagopyrum esculentum · TaxonSAplants · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“improved with Si application during recovery (P n by 4–65%, g s by 60–65%, T r by 96–245%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1189–1279 · show in text ↑
e1

“common buckwheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

During recovery, silicon improved buckwheat transpiration rate by 96–245%.

Taxon
common buckwheatFagopyrum esculentume1
Treatment
Si applicatione0
Outcome
T re0
Direction
improvede0
Value
96–245%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagopyrum esculentum
Fagopyrum esculentum · TaxonSAplants · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“improved with Si application during recovery (P n by 4–65%, g s by 60–65%, T r by 96–245%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1189–1279 · show in text ↑
e1

“common buckwheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–123 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging disrupted buckwheat PSII more than drought, as indicated by a positive K-band.

Taxon
common buckwheatFagopyrum esculentume1
Treatment
waterlogginge0
Outcome
PSII disruptione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
droughte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagopyrum esculentum
Fagopyrum esculentum · TaxonSAplants · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fluorescence transients revealed higher PSII disruption under waterlogging (evidenced by positive K-band) than drought.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1281–1400 · show in text ↑
e1

“common buckwheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon suppressed K-band formation and restored buckwheat PSII efficiency.

Taxon
common buckwheatFagopyrum esculentume1
Treatment
Silicon applicatione0
Outcome
K-band formation and restored PSII efficiencye0
Direction
suppressede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagopyrum esculentum
Fagopyrum esculentum · TaxonSAplants · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Silicon application suppressed K-band formation and restored PSII efficiency.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1401–1478 · show in text ↑
e1

“common buckwheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–123 · show in text ↑

silicon atom · physiology: oxidative · Fagopyrum esculentum (common buckwheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

silicon atom · physiology: water · Fagopyrum esculentum (common buckwheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

silicon atom · physiology: photosynthesis · Fagopyrum esculentum (common buckwheat)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

silicon atom · growth · Fagopyrum esculentum (common buckwheat)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

drought · physiology: water · Fagopyrum esculentum (common buckwheat)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

drought · growth · Fagopyrum esculentum (common buckwheat)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 1 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

flooding · growth · Fagopyrum esculentum (common buckwheat)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

drought · physiology: oxidative · Fagopyrum esculentum (common buckwheat)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.