Abstract
The experiment was carried out inside a canopy of green saran at the research station of the Department of Horticulture and Garden Engineering - Faculty of Agriculture - University of Tikrit for the period from February 28, 2023 to August 6, 2023, for the purpose of studying the effect of adding humic acid at four levels 0, 3, 5, 7 mg anvil-1 and three types of irrigation water: irrigation with river water, irrigation with well water and alternating irrigation. And the overlap between them in the characteristics of vegetative growth and cormat yield of the Gladiolus hybrid plant Amsterdam. Treatment with irrigation water types began from the first day after planting corms in plastic anvils. The first addition of humic acid began 30 days after planting, the second addition 15 days after the first addition and the third addition 15 days after the second addition. The experiment was designed with a splinter cutting system with a complete random sector design and three repeaters. The results showed that the treatment of irrigation with river water achieved a statistically significant superiority in the following studied characteristics: vegetative plant height 66.33 cm, leaf length 46.956 cm, leaf area 106.074 cm2, dry weight of leaves 0.752 g plant-1, Relative content of chlorophyll 17.063 Spad Unit, number of corms 3.297 corm-1, diameter of corms 33.690 mm. Treatment with humic acid at a concentration of 5 mg anvil-1 achieved statistically significant superiority in vegetative plant height 64.118 cm, leaf length 47.331 cm, leaf area 104.750 cm2, dry leaf weight 0.681 g plant-1, relative chlorophyll content 16.814 Spad Unit, number of corms 3.556 corm-1. Treatment with humic acid at a concentration of 7 mg anvil-1 also achieved a significant superiority in the characteristic of a cormate diameter of 33.690 mm.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 14
Claim · model-written summary
River water irrigation significantly improved plant height to 66.33 cm.
- Treatment
- irrigation with river watere0
- Outcome
- vegetative plant heighte0
- Direction
- superioritye0
- Value
- 66.33 cme0
GladiolusNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the treatment of irrigation with river water achieved a statistically significant superiority in the following studied characteristics: vegetative plant height 66.33 cm”
t0“Gladiolus”
Claim · model-written summary
River water irrigation significantly improved leaf length to 46.956 cm.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the treatment of irrigation with river water achieved a statistically significant superiority in the following studied characteristics: vegetative plant height 66.33 cm, leaf length 46.956 cm”
t0“Gladiolus”
Claim · model-written summary
River water irrigation significantly improved leaf area to 106.074 cm2.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the treatment of irrigation with river water achieved a statistically significant superiority”
e1“leaf area 106.074 cm2”
t0“Gladiolus”
Claim · model-written summary
River water irrigation significantly improved leaf dry weight to 0.752 g plant-1.
- Treatment
- irrigation with river watere0
- Outcome
- dry weight of leavese1
- Direction
- superioritye0
- Value
- 0.752 g plant-1e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the treatment of irrigation with river water achieved a statistically significant superiority”
e1“dry weight of leaves 0.752 g plant-1”
t0“Gladiolus”
Claim · model-written summary
River water irrigation significantly improved relative chlorophyll content to 17.063 Spad Unit.
- Treatment
- irrigation with river watere0
- Outcome
- Relative content of chlorophylle1
- Direction
- superioritye0
- Value
- 17.063 Spad Unite1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the treatment of irrigation with river water achieved a statistically significant superiority”
e1“Relative content of chlorophyll 17.063 Spad Unit”
t0“Gladiolus”
Claim · model-written summary
River water irrigation significantly improved corm number to 3.297 corm-1.
- Treatment
- irrigation with river watere0
- Outcome
- number of cormse1
- Direction
- superioritye0
- Value
- 3.297 corm-1e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the treatment of irrigation with river water achieved a statistically significant superiority”
e1“number of corms 3.297 corm-1”
t0“Gladiolus”
Claim · model-written summary
River water irrigation significantly improved corm diameter to 33.690 mm.
- Treatment
- irrigation with river watere0
- Outcome
- diameter of cormse1
- Direction
- superioritye0
- Value
- 33.690 mme1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the treatment of irrigation with river water achieved a statistically significant superiority”
e1“diameter of corms 33.690 mm”
t0“Gladiolus”
Claim · model-written summary
Humic acid at 5 mg anvil-1 significantly improved plant height to 64.118 cm.
- Treatment
- humic acid at a concentration of 5 mg anvil-1e0
- Outcome
- vegetative plant heighte0
- Direction
- superioritye0
- Value
- 64.118 cme0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Treatment with humic acid at a concentration of 5 mg anvil-1 achieved statistically significant superiority in vegetative plant height 64.118 cm”
t0“Gladiolus”
Claim · model-written summary
Humic acid at 5 mg anvil-1 significantly improved leaf length to 47.331 cm.
- Treatment
- humic acid at a concentration of 5 mg anvil-1e0
- Outcome
- leaf lengthe1
- Direction
- superioritye0
- Value
- 47.331 cme1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Treatment with humic acid at a concentration of 5 mg anvil-1 achieved statistically significant superiority”
e1“leaf length 47.331 cm”
t0“Gladiolus”
Claim · model-written summary
Humic acid at 5 mg anvil-1 significantly improved leaf area to 104.750 cm2.
- Treatment
- humic acid at a concentration of 5 mg anvil-1e0
- Outcome
- leaf areae1
- Direction
- superioritye0
- Value
- 104.750 cm2e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Treatment with humic acid at a concentration of 5 mg anvil-1 achieved statistically significant superiority”
e1“leaf area 104.750 cm2”
t0“Gladiolus”
Claim · model-written summary
Humic acid at 5 mg anvil-1 significantly improved leaf dry weight to 0.681 g plant-1.
- Treatment
- humic acid at a concentration of 5 mg anvil-1e0
- Outcome
- dry leaf weighte1
- Direction
- superioritye0
- Value
- 0.681 g plant-1e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Treatment with humic acid at a concentration of 5 mg anvil-1 achieved statistically significant superiority”
e1“dry leaf weight 0.681 g plant-1”
t0“Gladiolus”
Claim · model-written summary
Humic acid at 5 mg anvil-1 significantly improved chlorophyll content to 16.814 Spad Unit.
- Treatment
- humic acid at a concentration of 5 mg anvil-1e0
- Outcome
- relative chlorophyll contente1
- Direction
- superioritye0
- Value
- 16.814 Spad Unite1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Treatment with humic acid at a concentration of 5 mg anvil-1 achieved statistically significant superiority”
e1“relative chlorophyll content 16.814 Spad Unit”
t0“Gladiolus”
Claim · model-written summary
Humic acid at 5 mg anvil-1 significantly improved corm number to 3.556 corm-1.
- Treatment
- humic acid at a concentration of 5 mg anvil-1e0
- Outcome
- number of cormse1
- Direction
- superioritye0
- Value
- 3.556 corm-1e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Treatment with humic acid at a concentration of 5 mg anvil-1 achieved statistically significant superiority”
e1“number of corms 3.556 corm-1”
t0“Gladiolus”
Claim · model-written summary
Humic acid at 7 mg anvil-1 significantly improved cormate diameter to 33.690 mm.
- Treatment
- humic acid at a concentration of 7 mg anvil-1e0
- Outcome
- cormate diametere0
- Direction
- superioritye0
- Value
- 33.690 mme0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Treatment with humic acid at a concentration of 7 mg anvil-1 also achieved a significant superiority in the characteristic of a cormate diameter of 33.690 mm.”
t0“Gladiolus”
The same questions in other papers
other · physiology: pigments · GladiolusResults agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
irrigation · physiology: pigments · GladiolusResults agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
irrigation · growth · GladiolusResults agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
other · growth · GladiolusResults agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.