Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Effect of biostimulants and biofertilizers on growth, flowering and quality of gladiolus (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) Cv. American beauty under greenhouse conditions

PB Pansuriya; D. K. Varu; R. R. Viradia

3
claims
3
verbatim quotes
13
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present experiment entitled “Effect of biostimulants and biofertilizers on growth, flowering and quality of gladiolus (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) cv. American Beauty under greenhouse conditions” was carried out at High Tech Horticulture Park, Department of Horticulture, College of Agriculture, Junagadh Agricultural University, Junagadh during 2015-2017. The experiment was laid out in Factorial Completely Randomized Block Design (FCRD) consisting two factors with three repitations. Four treatments of biostimulants and three treatments of biofertilizers were considered as treatment combinations. The results indicated that application of humic acid 0.2% with Azotobacter @ 2.5 ml/plant + PSB @ 2.5 ml/plant + KSB @ 2.5 ml/plant at first spray at 30 DAP, second spray at 45 DAP and third spray at 60 DAP of biostimulants and soil application of biofertilizers at the time of planting and two month after planting gives higher vegetative growth, flowering and quality parameters in gladiolus.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid plus Azotobacter, PSB and KSB produced higher vegetative growth in gladiolus.

Taxon
gladiolusGladioluse0
Treatment
humic acid 0.2% with Azotobacter @ 2.5 ml/plant + PSB @ 2.5 ml/plant + KSB @ 2.5 ml/plante0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Second interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Outcome
vegetative growthe0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
KSBe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of humic acid 0.2% with Azotobacter @ 2.5 ml/plant + PSB @ 2.5 ml/plant + KSB @ 2.5 ml/plant at first spray at 30 DAP, second spray at 45 DAP and third spray at 60 DAP of biostimulants and soil application of biofertilizers at the time of planting and two month after planting gives higher vegetative growth, flowering and quality parameters in gladiolus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–998 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same humic acid and biofertilizer combination produced higher flowering in gladiolus.

Taxon
gladiolusGladioluse0
Treatment
humic acid 0.2% with Azotobacter @ 2.5 ml/plant + PSB @ 2.5 ml/plant + KSB @ 2.5 ml/plante0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Second interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Outcome
floweringe0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
KSBe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of humic acid 0.2% with Azotobacter @ 2.5 ml/plant + PSB @ 2.5 ml/plant + KSB @ 2.5 ml/plant at first spray at 30 DAP, second spray at 45 DAP and third spray at 60 DAP of biostimulants and soil application of biofertilizers at the time of planting and two month after planting gives higher vegetative growth, flowering and quality parameters in gladiolus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–998 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same humic acid and biofertilizer combination produced higher quality parameters in gladiolus.

Taxon
gladiolusGladioluse0
Treatment
humic acid 0.2% with Azotobacter @ 2.5 ml/plant + PSB @ 2.5 ml/plant + KSB @ 2.5 ml/plante0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Second interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Outcome
quality parameterse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
KSBe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of humic acid 0.2% with Azotobacter @ 2.5 ml/plant + PSB @ 2.5 ml/plant + KSB @ 2.5 ml/plant at first spray at 30 DAP, second spray at 45 DAP and third spray at 60 DAP of biostimulants and soil application of biofertilizers at the time of planting and two month after planting gives higher vegetative growth, flowering and quality parameters in gladiolus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–998 · show in text ↑

Azotobacter · phenology · GladiolusResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Azotobacter · growth · GladiolusResults agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

other · phenology · GladiolusResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

other · growth · GladiolusResults agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.