Paper · 2025 · Al-Azhar Journal of Agricultural Research

Efficacy of elicitors and conventional insecticides against insect pests on common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) crop

Esmael Mohamed; Mohamed Fawzy Eltawil; Hassan Sobhy Khalifa; et al.

9
claims
23
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is a vital crop for food security and export in Egypt, yet its productivity is heavily constrained by infestations of aphids (Aphis craccivora) and leaf miners (Liriomyza trifolii). This study investigated the comparative efficacy of three plant defense elicitors—salicylic acid (SA), chitosan (CH), and pyroligneous acid (PA)—and three conventional insecticides—chlorpyrifos, imidacloprid, and emamectin benzoate—applied individually and in combination under laboratory and field conditions during the 2022 and 2023 growing seasons.Laboratory assays using the leaf-dip method were performed to determine LC₅₀ and LC₉₀ values, while field experiments were arranged in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with 11 treatments and one untreated control, replicated three times. Treatments were evaluated for their impact on pest suppression, sublethal effects (aphid fecundity and leaf miner tunnel length), and crop performance (biological, seed, and straw yields).Results demonstrated that combinations, especially chlorpyrifos + SA, imidacloprid + SA, and emamectin + SA, achieved the lowest LC₅₀ values and produced the highest pest suppression. Under field conditions, pest reduction reached 77.2%, with emamectin + SA and chlorpyrifos + SA being most effective. These treatments significantly reduced aphid reproduction and tunneling activity of leaf miners. Yield improvements were also observed, with seed yields reaching 6.15 kg per 21 m² plot (≈1230 kg/feddan).In conclusion, integrating systemic insecticides with biochemical elicitors enhanced pest control efficacy, minimized chemical reliance, and improved crop productivity. This approach offers a sustainable and resilient integrated pest management (IPM) framework suitable for Egyptian legume cultivation systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorpyrifos plus SA yielded among the lowest LC₅₀ values and highest pest suppression.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
chlorpyrifos + SAe0
Outcome
LC₅₀ values and produced the highest pest suppressione0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedInteractorComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combinations, especially chlorpyrifos + SA, imidacloprid + SA, and emamectin + SA, achieved the lowest LC₅₀ values and produced the highest pest suppression.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1191 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid plus SA yielded among the lowest LC₅₀ values and highest pest suppression.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
imidacloprid + SAe0
Outcome
LC₅₀ values and produced the highest pest suppressione0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combinations, especially chlorpyrifos + SA, imidacloprid + SA, and emamectin + SA, achieved the lowest LC₅₀ values and produced the highest pest suppression.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1191 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Emamectin plus SA yielded among the lowest LC₅₀ values and highest pest suppression.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
emamectin + SAe0
Outcome
LC₅₀ values and produced the highest pest suppressione0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combinations, especially chlorpyrifos + SA, imidacloprid + SA, and emamectin + SA, achieved the lowest LC₅₀ values and produced the highest pest suppression.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1191 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field pest reduction reached 77.2%; emamectin plus SA was among the most effective treatments.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
emamectin + SAe0
Outcome
pest reductione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
77.2%e0
Setting
field conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under field conditions, pest reduction reached 77.2%, with emamectin + SA and chlorpyrifos + SA being most effective.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1192–1309 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field pest reduction reached 77.2%; chlorpyrifos plus SA was among the most effective treatments.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
chlorpyrifos + SAe0
Outcome
pest reductione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
77.2%e0
Setting
field conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under field conditions, pest reduction reached 77.2%, with emamectin + SA and chlorpyrifos + SA being most effective.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1192–1309 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The most effective treatments significantly reduced aphid reproduction.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
emamectin + SA and chlorpyrifos + SAe1
Interactor
Aphis craccivoraAphis craccivorae2pest
Outcome
aphid reproductione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aphis craccivora
Aphis craccivora · InteractorSimon Hinkley & Ken Walker Museum Victoria · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These treatments significantly reduced aphid reproduction and tunneling activity of leaf miners.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1310–1406 · show in text ↑
e1

“emamectin + SA and chlorpyrifos + SA being most effective.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1309 · show in text ↑
e2

“aphids (Aphis craccivora)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–183 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The most effective treatments significantly reduced leaf-miner tunneling.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
emamectin + SA and chlorpyrifos + SAe1
Interactor
Liriomyza trifoliiLiriomyza trifoliie2pest
Outcome
tunneling activity of leaf minerse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Liriomyza trifolii
Liriomyza trifolii · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLonsdale O, Murphy ST, Scheffer SJ · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These treatments significantly reduced aphid reproduction and tunneling activity of leaf miners.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1310–1406 · show in text ↑
e1

“emamectin + SA and chlorpyrifos + SA being most effective.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1309 · show in text ↑
e2

“leaf miners (Liriomyza trifolii)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 188–220 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments improved seed yield, which reached 6.15 kg per 21 m² plot.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Outcome
seed yieldse0
Direction
improvementse0
Value
6.15 kg per 21 m² plote0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield improvements were also observed, with seed yields reaching 6.15 kg per 21 m² plot (≈1230 kg/feddan).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1407–1513 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–111 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose insecticide and elicitor integration as an integrated pest management approach for Egyptian legumes.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
integrating systemic insecticides with biochemical elicitorse1
Outcome
integrated pest management (IPM) frameworke0
Setting
Egyptian legume cultivation systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This approach offers a sustainable and resilient integrated pest management (IPM) framework suitable for Egyptian legume cultivation systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1682–1823 · show in text ↑
e1

“integrating systemic insecticides with biochemical elicitors enhanced pest control efficacy, minimized chemical reliance, and improved crop productivity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1528–1681 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–111 · show in text ↑

imidacloprid · control · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

emamectin · Liriomyza trifolii · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

chlorpyrifos · Liriomyza trifolii · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

chlorpyrifos · control · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.