Paper · 2025 · Soil & Environment

The impact of varying straw return rates and nitrogen application timings on winter wheat performance and soil nutrient availability

Kem Senou Pavel Daryl; Yuhang Yan; Gabriel Hopla Akwakwa; et al.

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Optimizing straw return and nitrogen (N) fertilizer management is critical for enhancing sustainable wheat production. A two-season field study investigated the synergistic effects of varying rice straw return rates (s₁ = full straw return, s₂ = 50% straw return, s₃ = no straw return) and split nitrogen fertilizer strategies (n₁ = conventional N, n₂ = 126 kg ha-1basal + 54 kg ha-1overwinter, n₃ = three-split N application; ck = control, no N fertilizer) on wheat yield, yield components, soil fertility, biomass accumulation, and photosynthetic efficiency. The results consistently demonstrated that the combined strategy had a significant impact on all measured parameters. The optimal treatment, 50% straw return (s₂) coupled with a two-split nitrogen application (n₂), maximized wheat grain yield at approximately 7,384±173 kg ha-1, representing a 15−19% increase over conventional practices (s₃-n₁). This yield advantage was primarily attributed to enhanced spike formation. Furthermore, full straw return (s₁) combined with a three-split nitrogen application (n₃) significantly improved soil fertility, achieving the highest soil organic carbon (SOC) content (22.1 g kg-1), which was 55.1−81.5% higher than conventional methods, alongside substantial increases in soil N, P, and K. The s₂-n₂ treatment also led to peak dry matter accumulation (31,604 kg ha-1 at maturity), a 158% increase over the control (ck). For photosynthetic performance, 50% straw return (s₂) with three-split nitrogen (n₃) consistently produced superior SPAD values (83.1) and LAI (4.65) at 14 days after flowering, sustaining active photosynthesis 50−100% longer than conventional practices. These research findings underscore that moderate straw retention combined with strategic split nitrogen application provides a balanced approach, enhancing both wheat productivity and soil health by optimizing nutrient availability and prolonged photosynthetic activity, while avoiding the yield penalties associated with excessive incorporation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Half straw return with two nitrogen splits raised wheat grain yield 15−19% above conventional practice.

Treatment
50% straw return (s₂) coupled with a two-split nitrogen application (n₂)e0
Outcome
wheat grain yielde0
Direction
maximizede0
Value
7,384±173 kg ha-1e0
Qualifier
15−19% increasee0
Comparator
conventional practices (s₃-n₁)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The optimal treatment, 50% straw return (s₂) coupled with a two-split nitrogen application (n₂), maximized wheat grain yield at approximately 7,384±173 kg ha-1, representing a 15−19% increase over conventional practices (s₃-n₁).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–907 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The yield advantage was attributed mainly to enhanced spike formation.

Outcome
yield advantagee0
Qualifier
enhanced spike formatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This yield advantage was primarily attributed to enhanced spike formation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–982 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Full straw return and three nitrogen splits raised soil organic carbon to 22.1 g kg-1, 55.1−81.5% above conventional methods.

Treatment
full straw return (s₁) combined with a three-split nitrogen application (n₃)e0
Outcome
soil organic carbon (SOC) contente0
Direction
higheste0
Value
22.1 g kg-1e0
Qualifier
55.1−81.5% highere0
Comparator
conventional methodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“full straw return (s₁) combined with a three-split nitrogen application (n₃) significantly improved soil fertility, achieving the highest soil organic carbon (SOC) content (22.1 g kg-1), which was 55.1−81.5% higher than conventional methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1236 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full straw return with three nitrogen splits increased soil nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium.

Treatment
full straw return (s₁) combined with a three-split nitrogen application (n₃)e0
Outcome
soil N, P, and Ke1
Direction
increasese1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“full straw return (s₁) combined with a three-split nitrogen application (n₃) significantly improved soil fertility”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1110 · show in text ↑
e1

“alongside substantial increases in soil N, P, and K”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1289 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Half straw return with two nitrogen splits increased dry matter accumulation 158% over the control.

Treatment
50% straw return (s₂) coupled with a two-split nitrogen application (n₂)e1
Outcome
dry matter accumulatione0
Direction
peake0
Value
31,604 kg ha-1e0
Qualifier
158% increasee0
Comparator
the control (ck)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The s₂-n₂ treatment also led to peak dry matter accumulation (31,604 kg ha-1 at maturity), a 158% increase over the control (ck).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1291–1420 · show in text ↑
e1

“50% straw return (s₂) coupled with a two-split nitrogen application (n₂)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–774 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Half straw return with three nitrogen splits yielded a superior SPAD value of 83.1.

Treatment
50% straw return (s₂) with three-split nitrogen (n₃)e0
Outcome
SPAD valuese0
Direction
superiore0
Value
83.1e0
Qualifier
14 days after floweringe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“50% straw return (s₂) with three-split nitrogen (n₃) consistently produced superior SPAD values (83.1) and LAI (4.65) at 14 days after flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1453–1597 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Half straw return with three nitrogen splits yielded superior leaf area index of 4.65.

Treatment
50% straw return (s₂) with three-split nitrogen (n₃)e0
Outcome
LAIe0
Direction
superiore0
Value
4.65e0
Qualifier
14 days after floweringe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“50% straw return (s₂) with three-split nitrogen (n₃) consistently produced superior SPAD values (83.1) and LAI (4.65) at 14 days after flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1453–1597 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Half straw return with three nitrogen splits sustained active photosynthesis 50−100% longer than conventional practice.

Treatment
50% straw return (s₂) with three-split nitrogen (n₃)e0
Outcome
active photosynthesise0
Direction
longere0
Value
50−100%e0
Comparator
conventional practicese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“50% straw return (s₂) with three-split nitrogen (n₃) consistently produced superior SPAD values (83.1) and LAI (4.65) at 14 days after flowering, sustaining active photosynthesis 50−100% longer than conventional practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1453–1674 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–101 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate straw retention and split nitrogen application were recommended to balance wheat productivity and soil health.

Outcome
moderate straw retention combined with strategic split nitrogen applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“moderate straw retention combined with strategic split nitrogen application provides a balanced approach, enhancing both wheat productivity and soil health by optimizing nutrient availability and prolonged photosynthetic activity, while avoiding the yield penalties associated with excessive incorporation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1716–2021 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–101 · show in text ↑

organic · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

71 papers: 60 positive, 11 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

67 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

organic · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

nitrogen · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 38 positive, 11 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

organic · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

57 papers: 53 positive, 4 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

organic · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

89 papers: 79 positive, 10 negative or no effect

78 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

85 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

nitrogen · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

101 papers: 92 positive, 9 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

97 papers more in this group

See all 101 papers →

nitrogen · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

120 papers: 98 positive, 22 negative or no effect

97 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

116 papers more in this group

See all 120 papers →

organic · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

322 papers: 281 positive, 41 negative or no effect

280 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

318 papers more in this group

See all 322 papers →

8 of 12 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.