Paper · 2025 · Irrigation and Drainage

Effects of Deficit Irrigation and Growth Regulators on Physio‐Biochemical Changes, Yield, Fruit Quality and Water Productivity in Pomegranate ( Punica granatum ) Growing in Shallow Basaltic Soils

Goutam Guruprasad Jena; D. D. Nangare; V. D. Kakade; et al.

11
claims
21
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT A field study was conducted (2021–2022) that evaluated the effects of deficit irrigation (DI) strategies [60% and 80% of crop evapotranspiration (ETc)] and plant growth regulators [PGRs; salicylic acid (SA) and naphthalene acetic acid (NAA)] on fruit yield, water use efficiency (WUE) and physiological responses of pomegranate grown in shallow basaltic soils. Irrigation at 80% ETc combined with SA and NAA significantly increased fruit yield by 32% and 40% and improved WUE by 65% and 75% under DI and partial root‐zone drying (PRD), respectively. PRD outperformed DI, producing 8.56% higher yield and 6.25% higher WUE at the same irrigation level without PGRs. Physiological parameters such as the relative water content, membrane stability index (MSI), normalized difference vegetation index, photosystem II efficiency, chlorophyll content and photosynthetic rate were strongly correlated with fruit yield ( r = 0.90–0.97). Under stress conditions, SA application increased the photosynthetic rate and MSI while reducing the leaf surface temperature by 6%, 8% and 2%, respectively, compared with those of untreated plants. Foliar application of SA (300 ppm) + NAA (45 ppm) under DI‐80 or PRD‐80 enhanced water productivity and fruit yield in pomegranates in challenging soil conditions in semiarid regions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under DI at 80% ETc, SA and NAA increased fruit yield by 32%.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
80% ETc combined with SA and NAAe0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
32%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation at 80% ETc combined with SA and NAA significantly increased fruit yield by 32% and 40% and improved WUE by 65% and 75% under DI and partial root‐zone drying (PRD), respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–558 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–141 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under PRD at 80% ETc, SA and NAA increased fruit yield by 40%.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
80% ETc combined with SA and NAAe0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
40%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation at 80% ETc combined with SA and NAA significantly increased fruit yield by 32% and 40% and improved WUE by 65% and 75% under DI and partial root‐zone drying (PRD), respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–558 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–141 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under DI, the combined treatment improved WUE by 65%.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
80% ETc combined with SA and NAAe0
Outcome
WUEe0
Direction
improvede0
Value
65%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation at 80% ETc combined with SA and NAA significantly increased fruit yield by 32% and 40% and improved WUE by 65% and 75% under DI and partial root‐zone drying (PRD), respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–558 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–141 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under PRD, the combined treatment improved WUE by 75%.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
80% ETc combined with SA and NAAe0
Outcome
WUEe0
Direction
improvede0
Value
75%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation at 80% ETc combined with SA and NAA significantly increased fruit yield by 32% and 40% and improved WUE by 65% and 75% under DI and partial root‐zone drying (PRD), respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–558 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–141 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PRD produced 8.56% higher yield than DI at equal irrigation without PGRs.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
PRDe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
8.56%e0
Qualifier
at the same irrigation level without PGRse0
Comparator
DIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PRD outperformed DI, producing 8.56% higher yield and 6.25% higher WUE at the same irrigation level without PGRs.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–672 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–141 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PRD produced 6.25% higher WUE than DI at equal irrigation without PGRs.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
PRDe0
Outcome
WUEe0
Direction
highere0
Value
6.25%e0
Comparator
DIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PRD outperformed DI, producing 8.56% higher yield and 6.25% higher WUE at the same irrigation level without PGRs.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–672 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–141 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water status, canopy indices, chlorophyll and photosynthesis correlated strongly with fruit yield.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Qualifier
r = 0.90–0.97e0

Not reportedOrgan / stageDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Physiological parameters such as the relative water content, membrane stability index (MSI), normalized difference vegetation index, photosystem II efficiency, chlorophyll content and photosynthetic rate were strongly correlated with fruit yield ( r = 0.90–0.97).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–936 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–141 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SA raised photosynthetic rate by 6% under stress.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
SA applicatione0
Outcome
photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
6%e0
Comparator
untreated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under stress conditions, SA application increased the photosynthetic rate and MSI while reducing the leaf surface temperature by 6%, 8% and 2%, respectively, compared with those of untreated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1135 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–141 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SA raised MSI by 8% under stress.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
SA applicatione0
Outcome
MSIe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
8%e0
Comparator
untreated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under stress conditions, SA application increased the photosynthetic rate and MSI while reducing the leaf surface temperature by 6%, 8% and 2%, respectively, compared with those of untreated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1135 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–141 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SA reduced leaf surface temperature by 2% under stress.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
SA applicatione0
Outcome
leaf surface temperaturee0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
2%e0
Comparator
untreated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under stress conditions, SA application increased the photosynthetic rate and MSI while reducing the leaf surface temperature by 6%, 8% and 2%, respectively, compared with those of untreated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1135 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–141 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors identify SA plus NAA under DI-80 or PRD-80 as enhancing water productivity and fruit yield.

Taxon
pomegranatesPunica granatume0
Treatment
SA (300 ppm) + NAA (45 ppm)e0
Outcome
water productivity and fruit yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application of SA (300 ppm) + NAA (45 ppm) under DI‐80 or PRD‐80 enhanced water productivity and fruit yield in pomegranates in challenging soil conditions in semiarid regions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1319 · show in text ↑

salicylic acid · physiology: oxidative · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results differ

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

salicylic acid · soil: physics · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

salicylic acid · yield · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · yield · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

irrigation · yield · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 26 positive, 8 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.