Abstract
A pot experiment was conducted during rabi season of 2019-20 at the Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Bundelkhand University, Jhansi U.P, to find out the suitable doses of Zn and Mo for chickpea crop. The experiment was carried out in CRD with 3 replication having nine treatments as T0- RDF (20:40: 20 kg ha-1), T1- Zn 20 kg ha-1 + Mo 0 kg ha-1, T2- Zn 30 kg ha-1 + Mo 0 kg ha-1, T3- Zn 0 kg ha-1 + Mo 1 kg ha-1, T4- Zn 20 kg ha-1 + Mo 1 kg ha-1, T5- Zn 30 kg ha-1 + Mo 1 kg ha-1, T6- Zn 0 kg ha-1 + Mo 2 kg ha-1, T7- Zn 20 kg ha-1 + Mo 2 kg ha-1 , T8- Zn 30 kg ha-1 + Mo 2 kg ha-1. The results indicated that growth, yield attributes and yield viz. plant height, branches plant-1, dry weight of plant, No. of pods plant-1, No. of seeds pod-1, grain yield, biological yield and stover yield were increased significantly and found better all treatments, over control, except T1. The highest values in respect to plant height (33.86cm, 34.09%), branches plant-1 (8.00, 60%), dry weight of plant(19.74 g plant-1, 38.52%) , No. of pods plant-1 (50.33, 14.39%), No. of seeds pod-1 (1.50, 150%) grain yield (32.27 g plant-1, 39.51%), stover yield (72.95 g plant-1, 45.54%) and biological yield (40.68 g plant-1, 42.81%) recorded in T5 followed by T3 and T8. The maximum nutrient concentration and its corresponding uptake of N,P,K content in grain (3.66 %N, 0.59%P, 0.72%K) and in straw (2.20 %N, 0.34%P, 1.57%K) recorded in T5, followed by T4 and T8. The Zinc and molybdenum concentration in grain (58.09 mg kg-1 and 1.59 mg kg-1) and in straw (56.56 mg kg-1 and 1.02 mg kg-1) were registered in T8. The highest uptake of NPK and Zn (0.208 g pot-1, 0.033 g pot-1,0.087 g pot-1 and 4.13 mg pot-1, respectively) in T5 and Mo uptake (0.086 mg pot-1) in T8. Maximum protein content in seed (22.88%) was observed in (T5) followed by T4 and T8. The T5 (Zn 30 kg ha-1 + Mo 1 kg ha-1) treatment was proved most superior in respect to growth, yield, nutrient concentration and corresponding uptake among treatments. The application of Zn and Mo with different doses enhanced the soil quality and increase the nutrient availability in soil.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 20
Claim · model-written summary
T5 gave the highest chickpea plant height, 33.86cm and 34.09%; all treatments except T1 significantly increased height over control, with T3 and T8 following T5.
- Taxon
- Cicer arietinum L.
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- Zn 30 kg ha-1 + Mo 1 kg ha-1e3
- Outcome
- plant heighte0
- Direction
- increasede2
- Value
- 33.86cm, 34.09%e0
- Qualifier
- followed by T3 and T8e1
- Comparator
- controle2
- Setting
- Bundelkhand University, Jhansi U.Pe4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
e0“plant height (33.86cm, 34.09%)”
e1“recorded in T5 followed by T3 and T8.”
e2“were increased significantly and found better all treatments, over control, except T1.”
e3“T5- Zn 30 kg ha-1 + Mo 1 kg ha-1”
e4“Bundelkhand University, Jhansi U.P”
Claim · model-written summary
T5 gave the highest chickpea branch count, 8.00 and 60%; treatments except T1 significantly increased branches over control.
- Taxon
- Cicer arietinum L.Cicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Zn 30 kg ha-1 + Mo 1 kg ha-1e3
- Outcome
- branches plant-1e0
- Direction
- increasede2
- Value
- 8.00, 60%e0
- Qualifier
- followed by T3 and T8e1
- Comparator
- controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
e0“branches plant-1 (8.00, 60%)”
e1“recorded in T5 followed by T3 and T8.”
e2“were increased significantly and found better all treatments, over control, except T1.”
e3“T5- Zn 30 kg ha-1 + Mo 1 kg ha-1”
Claim · model-written summary
T5 gave the highest chickpea dry weight, 19.74 g plant-1 and 38.52%; treatments except T1 significantly increased dry weight over control.
- Taxon
- Cicer arietinum L.Cicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Zn 30 kg ha-1 + Mo 1 kg ha-1e3
- Outcome
- dry weight of plante0
- Direction
- increasede2
- Value
- 19.74 g plant-1, 38.52%e0
- Qualifier
- followed by T3 and T8e1
- Comparator
- controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
e0“dry weight of plant(19.74 g plant-1, 38.52%)”
e1“recorded in T5 followed by T3 and T8.”
e2“were increased significantly and found better all treatments, over control, except T1.”
e3“T5- Zn 30 kg ha-1 + Mo 1 kg ha-1”
Claim · model-written summary
T5 gave the highest chickpea pod count, 50.33 and 14.39%; treatments except T1 significantly increased pods per plant over control.
- Taxon
- Cicer arietinum L.Cicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Zn 30 kg ha-1 + Mo 1 kg ha-1e3
- Outcome
- No. of pods plant-1e0
- Direction
- increasede2
- Value
- 50.33, 14.39%e0
- Qualifier
- followed by T3 and T8e1
- Comparator
- controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
e0“No. of pods plant-1 (50.33, 14.39%)”
e1“recorded in T5 followed by T3 and T8.”
e2“were increased significantly and found better all treatments, over control, except T1.”
e3“T5- Zn 30 kg ha-1 + Mo 1 kg ha-1”
Claim · model-written summary
T5 gave the highest chickpea seeds per pod, 1.50 and 150%; treatments except T1 significantly increased seeds per pod over control.
- Taxon
- Cicer arietinum L.Cicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Zn 30 kg ha-1 + Mo 1 kg ha-1e3
- Outcome
- No. of seeds pod-1e0
- Direction
- increasede2
- Value
- 1.50, 150%e0
- Qualifier
- followed by T3 and T8e1
- Comparator
- controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
e0“No. of seeds pod-1 (1.50, 150%)”
e1“recorded in T5 followed by T3 and T8.”
e2“were increased significantly and found better all treatments, over control, except T1.”
e3“T5- Zn 30 kg ha-1 + Mo 1 kg ha-1”
Claim · model-written summary
T5 gave the highest chickpea grain yield, 32.27 g plant-1 and 39.51%; treatments except T1 significantly increased grain yield over control.
- Taxon
- Cicer arietinum L.Cicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Zn 30 kg ha-1 + Mo 1 kg ha-1e3
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasede2
- Value
- 32.27 g plant-1, 39.51%e0
- Qualifier
- followed by T3 and T8e1
- Comparator
- controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
e0“grain yield (32.27 g plant-1, 39.51%)”
e1“recorded in T5 followed by T3 and T8.”
e2“were increased significantly and found better all treatments, over control, except T1.”
e3“T5- Zn 30 kg ha-1 + Mo 1 kg ha-1”
Claim · model-written summary
T5 gave the highest chickpea stover yield, 72.95 g plant-1 and 45.54%; treatments except T1 significantly increased stover yield over control.
- Taxon
- Cicer arietinum L.Cicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Zn 30 kg ha-1 + Mo 1 kg ha-1e3
- Outcome
- stover yielde0
- Direction
- increasede2
- Value
- 72.95 g plant-1, 45.54%e0
- Qualifier
- followed by T3 and T8e1
- Comparator
- controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
e0“stover yield (72.95 g plant-1, 45.54%)”
e1“recorded in T5 followed by T3 and T8.”
e2“were increased significantly and found better all treatments, over control, except T1.”
e3“T5- Zn 30 kg ha-1 + Mo 1 kg ha-1”
Claim · model-written summary
T5 gave the highest chickpea biological yield, 40.68 g plant-1 and 42.81%; treatments except T1 significantly increased biological yield over control.
- Taxon
- Cicer arietinum L.Cicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Zn 30 kg ha-1 + Mo 1 kg ha-1e3
- Outcome
- biological yielde0
- Direction
- increasede2
- Value
- 40.68 g plant-1, 42.81%e0
- Qualifier
- followed by T3 and T8e1
- Comparator
- controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
e0“biological yield (40.68 g plant-1, 42.81%)”
e1“recorded in T5 followed by T3 and T8.”
e2“were increased significantly and found better all treatments, over control, except T1.”
e3“T5- Zn 30 kg ha-1 + Mo 1 kg ha-1”
Claim · model-written summary
T5 had maximum grain N, P and K concentrations of 3.66 %N, 0.59%P and 0.72%K, with corresponding uptake also maximal, followed by T4 and T8.
- Taxon
- Cicer arietinum L.Cicer arietinumt0
- Organ / stage
- graine0
- Treatment
- Zn 30 kg ha-1 + Mo 1 kg ha-1e1
- Outcome
- nutrient concentration and its corresponding uptake of N,P,Ke0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 3.66 %N, 0.59%P, 0.72%Ke0
- Qualifier
- followed by T4 and T8e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Schema note from the model: Related nutrient results grouped to retain coverage within the 20-claim budget.
Verbatim
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
e0“The maximum nutrient concentration and its corresponding uptake of N,P,K content in grain (3.66 %N, 0.59%P, 0.72%K) and in straw (2.20 %N, 0.34%P, 1.57%K) recorded in T5, followed by T4 and T8.”
e1“T5- Zn 30 kg ha-1 + Mo 1 kg ha-1”
Claim · model-written summary
T5 had maximum straw N, P and K concentrations of 2.20 %N, 0.34%P and 1.57%K, with corresponding uptake also maximal, followed by T4 and T8.
- Taxon
- Cicer arietinum L.Cicer arietinumt0
- Organ / stage
- strawe0
- Treatment
- Zn 30 kg ha-1 + Mo 1 kg ha-1e1
- Outcome
- nutrient concentration and its corresponding uptake of N,P,Ke0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 2.20 %N, 0.34%P, 1.57%Ke0
- Qualifier
- followed by T4 and T8e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Schema note from the model: Related nutrient results grouped to retain coverage within the 20-claim budget.
Verbatim
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
e0“The maximum nutrient concentration and its corresponding uptake of N,P,K content in grain (3.66 %N, 0.59%P, 0.72%K) and in straw (2.20 %N, 0.34%P, 1.57%K) recorded in T5, followed by T4 and T8.”
e1“T5- Zn 30 kg ha-1 + Mo 1 kg ha-1”
Claim · model-written summary
T8 had grain zinc concentration of 58.09 mg kg-1.
- Taxon
- Cicer arietinum L.Cicer arietinumt0
- Organ / stage
- graine0
- Treatment
- Zn 30 kg ha-1 + Mo 2 kg ha-1e1
- Outcome
- Zince0
- Value
- 58.09 mg kg-1e0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
e0“The Zinc and molybdenum concentration in grain (58.09 mg kg-1 and 1.59 mg kg-1) and in straw (56.56 mg kg-1 and 1.02 mg kg-1) were registered in T8.”
e1“T8- Zn 30 kg ha-1 + Mo 2 kg ha-1”
Claim · model-written summary
T8 had grain molybdenum concentration of 1.59 mg kg-1.
- Taxon
- Cicer arietinum L.Cicer arietinumt0
- Organ / stage
- graine0
- Treatment
- Zn 30 kg ha-1 + Mo 2 kg ha-1e1
- Outcome
- molybdenum concentratione0
- Value
- 1.59 mg kg-1e0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
e0“The Zinc and molybdenum concentration in grain (58.09 mg kg-1 and 1.59 mg kg-1) and in straw (56.56 mg kg-1 and 1.02 mg kg-1) were registered in T8.”
e1“T8- Zn 30 kg ha-1 + Mo 2 kg ha-1”
Claim · model-written summary
T8 had straw zinc concentration of 56.56 mg kg-1.
- Taxon
- Cicer arietinum L.Cicer arietinumt0
- Organ / stage
- strawe0
- Treatment
- Zn 30 kg ha-1 + Mo 2 kg ha-1e1
- Outcome
- Zince0
- Value
- 56.56 mg kg-1e0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
e0“The Zinc and molybdenum concentration in grain (58.09 mg kg-1 and 1.59 mg kg-1) and in straw (56.56 mg kg-1 and 1.02 mg kg-1) were registered in T8.”
e1“T8- Zn 30 kg ha-1 + Mo 2 kg ha-1”
Claim · model-written summary
T8 had straw molybdenum concentration of 1.02 mg kg-1.
- Taxon
- Cicer arietinum L.Cicer arietinumt0
- Organ / stage
- strawe0
- Treatment
- Zn 30 kg ha-1 + Mo 2 kg ha-1e1
- Outcome
- molybdenum concentratione0
- Value
- 1.02 mg kg-1e0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
e0“The Zinc and molybdenum concentration in grain (58.09 mg kg-1 and 1.59 mg kg-1) and in straw (56.56 mg kg-1 and 1.02 mg kg-1) were registered in T8.”
e1“T8- Zn 30 kg ha-1 + Mo 2 kg ha-1”
Claim · model-written summary
T5 had the highest N, P and K uptake, respectively 0.208, 0.033 and 0.087 g pot-1.
- Taxon
- Cicer arietinum L.Cicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Zn 30 kg ha-1 + Mo 1 kg ha-1e1
- Outcome
- uptake of NPKe0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 0.208 g pot-1, 0.033 g pot-1,0.087 g pot-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Schema note from the model: Related nutrient uptake results grouped to retain coverage within the 20-claim budget.
Verbatim
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
e0“The highest uptake of NPK and Zn (0.208 g pot-1, 0.033 g pot-1,0.087 g pot-1 and 4.13 mg pot-1, respectively) in T5”
e1“T5- Zn 30 kg ha-1 + Mo 1 kg ha-1”
Claim · model-written summary
T5 had the highest zinc uptake, 4.13 mg pot-1.
- Taxon
- Cicer arietinum L.Cicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Zn 30 kg ha-1 + Mo 1 kg ha-1e1
- Outcome
- Zne0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 4.13 mg pot-1e0
- Qualifier
- uptakee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
e0“The highest uptake of NPK and Zn (0.208 g pot-1, 0.033 g pot-1,0.087 g pot-1 and 4.13 mg pot-1, respectively) in T5”
e1“T5- Zn 30 kg ha-1 + Mo 1 kg ha-1”
Claim · model-written summary
T8 had the highest molybdenum uptake, 0.086 mg pot-1.
- Taxon
- Cicer arietinum L.Cicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Zn 30 kg ha-1 + Mo 2 kg ha-1e1
- Outcome
- Mo uptakee0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 0.086 mg pot-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
e0“The highest uptake of NPK and Zn (0.208 g pot-1, 0.033 g pot-1,0.087 g pot-1 and 4.13 mg pot-1, respectively) in T5 and Mo uptake (0.086 mg pot-1) in T8.”
e1“T8- Zn 30 kg ha-1 + Mo 2 kg ha-1”
Claim · model-written summary
T5 had maximum seed protein content of 22.88%, followed by T4 and T8.
- Taxon
- Cicer arietinum L.Cicer arietinumt0
- Organ / stage
- seede0
- Treatment
- Zn 30 kg ha-1 + Mo 1 kg ha-1e1
- Outcome
- protein contente0
- Direction
- Maximume0
- Value
- 22.88%e0
- Qualifier
- followed by T4 and T8e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
e0“Maximum protein content in seed (22.88%) was observed in (T5) followed by T4 and T8.”
e1“T5- Zn 30 kg ha-1 + Mo 1 kg ha-1”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors concluded T5 was the most superior treatment for chickpea growth, yield, nutrient concentration and corresponding uptake.
- Taxon
- Cicer arietinum L.Cicer arietinumt0
- Outcome
- T5 (Zn 30 kg ha-1 + Mo 1 kg ha-1) treatmente0
- Direction
- most superiore0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
e0“The T5 (Zn 30 kg ha-1 + Mo 1 kg ha-1) treatment was proved most superior in respect to growth, yield, nutrient concentration and corresponding uptake among treatments.”
Claim · model-written summary
Applying different zinc and molybdenum doses enhanced soil quality and increased soil nutrient availability.
- Treatment
- application of Zn and Mo with different dosese0
- Outcome
- soil quality and increase the nutrient availability in soile0
- Direction
- enhancede0
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“The application of Zn and Mo with different doses enhanced the soil quality and increase the nutrient availability in soil.”
The same questions in other papers
molybdenum atom · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →zinc atom · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ
11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →molybdenum atom · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ
28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- positive
27 papers more in this group
See all 31 papers →zinc atom · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ
34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
34 papers more in this group
See all 38 papers →zinc atom · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ
66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
67 papers more in this group
See all 71 papers →molybdenum atom · quality: general · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- negative
molybdenum atom · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →molybdenum atom · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.