Abstract
Field experiment on determining the effect of seed presowing treatment by promising methods (ultraviolet radiation, ozonation, low-frequency electromagnetic field) on the state of crops and biological yield of winter wheat was carried out. The results obtained were compared with the results of conventional seed treatment with chemical agent. It was found that presowing treatment with ozone and UV radiation stimulated seed germination and increased their field germination. Biological yield of control plants was higher for plots where seeds were treated with UV radiation and ozone by 5.8 and 2.34%, respectively. Seed treatment with electromagnetic fields did not result in higher yields. Actual yield data confirmed this trend. Straw and grain weight and their ratio significantly exceeded the control value in the plots where seeds were treated with UV radiation and ozone. Chemical analysis showed that only grain from plots where seeds were treated with ozone had significant excess over the control value: protein and gluten content was higher by 4.2 and 5.2%, respectively. The results obtained in the field experiment are largely consistent with the results of previous published studies. The combination of exposure to ozone and UV radiation during presowing treatment of seeds will provide disinfection and stimulation of germination, increase field germination, plant density, yields, and improve grain quality. These methods have shown better results in comparison with the method of seed treatment by chemical agent and, therefore, they can be recommended for implementation in production. Their combined use will make it possible to carry out effective disinfection and stimulation of germination, as well as to increase the yield and quality of grain.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 14
Claim · model-written summary
Presowing treatment with ozone stimulated seed germination of winter wheat.
- Taxon
- winter wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- presowing treatment with ozonee1
- Outcome
- seed germinatione1
- Direction
- stimulatede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“winter wheat seeds”
e1“presowing treatment with ozone and UV radiation stimulated seed germination and increased their field germination”
Claim · model-written summary
Presowing treatment with ozone increased field germination of winter wheat.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- presowing treatment with ozonee1
- Outcome
- field germinatione1
- Direction
- increasede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“winter wheat seeds”
e1“presowing treatment with ozone and UV radiation stimulated seed germination and increased their field germination”
Claim · model-written summary
Presowing treatment with UV radiation stimulated seed germination of winter wheat.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- UV radiatione1
- Outcome
- seed germinatione1
- Direction
- stimulatede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“winter wheat seeds”
e1“presowing treatment with ozone and UV radiation stimulated seed germination and increased their field germination”
Claim · model-written summary
Presowing treatment with UV radiation increased field germination of winter wheat.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- UV radiatione1
- Outcome
- field germinatione1
- Direction
- increasede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“winter wheat seeds”
e1“presowing treatment with ozone and UV radiation stimulated seed germination and increased their field germination”
Claim · model-written summary
Biological yield of control plants was higher by 5.8 for plots treated with UV radiation.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- UV radiatione2
- Outcome
- Biological yielde2
- Direction
- highere2
- Value
- 5.8e2
- Comparator
- control plantse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“winter wheat seeds”
e2“Biological yield of control plants was higher for plots where seeds were treated with UV radiation and ozone by 5.8 and 2.34%, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Biological yield of control plants was higher by 2.34% for plots treated with ozone.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- ozonee2
- Outcome
- Biological yielde2
- Direction
- highere2
- Value
- 2.34%e2
- Comparator
- control plantse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“winter wheat seeds”
e2“Biological yield of control plants was higher for plots where seeds were treated with UV radiation and ozone by 5.8 and 2.34%, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed treatment with electromagnetic fields did not increase winter wheat yield.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Seed treatment with electromagnetic fieldse3
- Outcome
- yieldse3
- Direction
- did not result in highere3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“winter wheat seeds”
e3“Seed treatment with electromagnetic fields did not result in higher yields”
Claim · model-written summary
Actual yield data confirmed the earlier biological yield trend for winter wheat.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- Actual yielde4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“winter wheat seeds”
e4“Actual yield data confirmed this trend”
Claim · model-written summary
Straw weight, grain weight and their ratio significantly exceeded the control value in UV radiation plots.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- UV radiatione5
- Outcome
- Straw and grain weight and their ratioe5
- Direction
- significantly exceedede5
- Comparator
- control valuee5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“winter wheat seeds”
e5“Straw and grain weight and their ratio significantly exceeded the control value in the plots where seeds were treated with UV radiation and ozone”
Claim · model-written summary
Straw weight, grain weight and their ratio significantly exceeded the control value in ozone plots.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- ozonee5
- Outcome
- Straw and grain weight and their ratioe5
- Direction
- significantly exceedede5
- Comparator
- control valuee5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“winter wheat seeds”
e5“Straw and grain weight and their ratio significantly exceeded the control value in the plots where seeds were treated with UV radiation and ozone”
Claim · model-written summary
Grain protein content was higher by 4.2 for the ozone treatment, the only treatment with a significant grain excess.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- ozonee6
- Outcome
- proteine6
- Direction
- highere6
- Value
- 4.2e6
- Comparator
- control valuee6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“winter wheat seeds”
e6“only grain from plots where seeds were treated with ozone had significant excess over the control value: protein and gluten content was higher by 4.2 and 5.2%, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Gluten content was higher by 5.2% for the ozone treatment, the only treatment with a significant grain excess.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- ozonee6
- Outcome
- gluten contente6
- Direction
- highere6
- Value
- 5.2%e6
- Comparator
- control valuee6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“winter wheat seeds”
e6“only grain from plots where seeds were treated with ozone had significant excess over the control value: protein and gluten content was higher by 4.2 and 5.2%, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
The ozone and UV presowing methods can be recommended for implementation in winter wheat production.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- implementation in productione7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“winter wheat seeds”
e7“they can be recommended for implementation in production”
Claim · model-written summary
Presowing ozone and UV methods gave better results than chemical seed treatment in winter wheat.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- presowing treatment with ozone and UV radiatione1
- Outcome
- resultse7
- Direction
- bettere7
- Comparator
- seed treatment by chemical agente7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“winter wheat seeds”
e1“presowing treatment with ozone and UV radiation stimulated seed germination and increased their field germination”
e7“These methods have shown better results in comparison with the method of seed treatment by chemical agent”
The same questions in other papers
uv · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
21 papers more in this group
See all 25 papers →uv · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- negative
41 papers more in this group
See all 45 papers →ozone · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
54 papers more in this group
See all 58 papers →ozone · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 63 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
66 papers more in this group
See all 70 papers →ozone · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →seed treatment · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 270 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
297 papers more in this group
See all 301 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.