Paper · 2025 · Plants

Effects of Hydrogen Peroxide Soaking on the Seeds of Different Edible Bean Varieties

Ruili Dong; Zexiang Gao; Yapeng Gao; et al.

10
claims
31
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

To clarify the effects of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) seed soaking on the germination and stress resistance of different edible bean seeds, seeds of mung bean (Vigna radiata L. ‘Keda Green No. 2’), cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. ‘Keda Cowpea No. 1’), and red bean (Vigna umbellata Thunb. ‘Jihong 352’) were soaked in a 50 mmol/L H2O2 solution. The study examined the germination and growth-related physiological indices of seeds after soaking. The results showed that hydrogen-peroxide-primed seeds of mung bean (GBH), cowpea (CBH), and red bean (RBH) exhibited significant improvements in germination performance and physiological activity compared with their respective controls (GBCK, CBCK, and RBCK). The results indicated that H2O2 soaking significantly improved the germination ability of the seeds, with the germination rate of mung beans, cowpeas, and red beans increasing by 48.89%, 21.11%, and 18.89%, respectively, and the germination percentage increasing by 31.11%, 24.45%, and 17.77%. Additionally, H2O2 soaking enhanced the activity of α-amylase, protease, and the antioxidant enzymes peroxidase (POD), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and catalase (CAT); increased the soluble sugar and soluble protein content in the seeds; and reduced the malondialdehyde (MDA) content. The experiment demonstrated that H2O2 promotes the germination of mung bean, cowpea, and red bean seeds by influencing antioxidant enzyme activity, the breakdown of storage substances, and the regulation of germination-related substances, thereby improving seedling adaptation to environmental stress. This study aims to improve the germination rate of legume seeds using H2O2 treatment, providing a theoretical basis for techniques to enhance seed vigor, especially for seeds that perform poorly in germination under normal conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mung bean germination rate increased by 48.89% after H2O2 soaking.

Taxon
mung beansVigna radiatae0
Treatment
H2O2 soakinge1
Outcome
germination ratee0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
48.89%e0
Comparator
respective controlse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the germination rate of mung beans, cowpeas, and red beans increasing by 48.89%, 21.11%, and 18.89%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–919 · show in text ↑
e1

“H2O2 soaking significantly improved the germination ability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–786 · show in text ↑
e2

“respective controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–675 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea germination rate increased by 21.11% after H2O2 soaking.

Treatment
H2O2 soakinge1
Outcome
germination ratee0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
21.11%e0
Comparator
respective controlse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the germination rate of mung beans, cowpeas, and red beans increasing by 48.89%, 21.11%, and 18.89%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–919 · show in text ↑
e1

“H2O2 soaking significantly improved the germination ability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–786 · show in text ↑
e2

“respective controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–675 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Red bean germination rate increased by 18.89% after H2O2 soaking.

Taxon
red beanse0
Treatment
H2O2 soakinge1
Outcome
germination ratee0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
18.89%e0
Comparator
respective controlse2

Verbatim

e0

“the germination rate of mung beans, cowpeas, and red beans increasing by 48.89%, 21.11%, and 18.89%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–919 · show in text ↑
e1

“H2O2 soaking significantly improved the germination ability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–786 · show in text ↑
e2

“respective controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–675 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mung bean germination percentage increased by 31.11%.

Taxon
mung beansVigna radiatae2
Treatment
H2O2 soakinge1
Outcome
germination percentagee0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
31.11%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the germination percentage increasing by 31.11%, 24.45%, and 17.77%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–992 · show in text ↑
t0

“Different Edible Bean Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“H2O2 soaking significantly improved the germination ability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–786 · show in text ↑
e2

“the germination rate of mung beans, cowpeas, and red beans increasing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–875 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea germination percentage increased by 24.45%.

Treatment
H2O2 soakinge1
Outcome
germination percentagee0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
24.45%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the germination percentage increasing by 31.11%, 24.45%, and 17.77%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–992 · show in text ↑
t0

“Different Edible Bean Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“H2O2 soaking significantly improved the germination ability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–786 · show in text ↑
e2

“the germination rate of mung beans, cowpeas, and red beans increasing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–875 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Red bean germination percentage increased by 17.77%.

Taxon
red beanse2
Treatment
H2O2 soakinge1
Outcome
germination percentagee0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
17.77%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the germination percentage increasing by 31.11%, 24.45%, and 17.77%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–992 · show in text ↑
t0

“Different Edible Bean Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“H2O2 soaking significantly improved the germination ability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–786 · show in text ↑
e2

“the germination rate of mung beans, cowpeas, and red beans increasing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–875 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

H2O2 soaking enhanced seed hydrolase activity.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
H2O2 soakinge0
Outcome
activity of α-amylase, proteasee0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“H2O2 soaking enhanced the activity of α-amylase, protease, and the antioxidant enzymes peroxidase (POD), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and catalase (CAT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1159 · show in text ↑
t0

“seeds of mung bean (Vigna radiata L. ‘Keda Green No. 2’), cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. ‘Keda Cowpea No. 1’), and red bean (Vigna umbellata Thunb. ‘Jihong 352’)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 137–296 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

H2O2 soaking enhanced antioxidant enzyme activity.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
H2O2 soakinge0
Outcome
peroxidase (POD), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and catalase (CAT)e0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“H2O2 soaking enhanced the activity of α-amylase, protease, and the antioxidant enzymes peroxidase (POD), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and catalase (CAT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1159 · show in text ↑
t0

“seeds of mung bean (Vigna radiata L. ‘Keda Green No. 2’), cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. ‘Keda Cowpea No. 1’), and red bean (Vigna umbellata Thunb. ‘Jihong 352’)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 137–296 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

H2O2 soaking increased soluble sugar and protein content.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
H2O2 soakingt1
Outcome
soluble sugar and soluble protein contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased the soluble sugar and soluble protein content in the seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1229 · show in text ↑
t0

“seeds of mung bean (Vigna radiata L. ‘Keda Green No. 2’), cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. ‘Keda Cowpea No. 1’), and red bean (Vigna umbellata Thunb. ‘Jihong 352’)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 137–296 · show in text ↑
t1

“Additionally, H2O2 soaking”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1020 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

H2O2 soaking reduced seed malondialdehyde content.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
H2O2 soakingt1
Outcome
malondialdehyde (MDA) contente0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduced the malondialdehyde (MDA) content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1276 · show in text ↑
t0

“seeds of mung bean (Vigna radiata L. ‘Keda Green No. 2’), cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. ‘Keda Cowpea No. 1’), and red bean (Vigna umbellata Thunb. ‘Jihong 352’)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 137–296 · show in text ↑
t1

“Additionally, H2O2 soaking”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1020 · show in text ↑

hydrogen peroxide · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

hydrogen peroxide · physiology: oxidative · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

hydrogen peroxide · physiology: osmolytes · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

hydrogen peroxide · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

hydrogen peroxide · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

application · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

59 papers: 53 positive, 6 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

55 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

application · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

98 papers: 94 positive, 4 negative or no effect

93 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

94 papers more in this group

See all 98 papers →

application · physiology: osmolytes · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.