Paper · 2025 · Communications Earth & Environment

Size-engineered magnetite nanoparticles protect rice from Fusarium graminearum via direct antifungal activity and immune activation

Mengmeng Kong; Hairong Jing; Jing Yang; et al.

7
claims
19
verbatim quotes
6
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Fusarium diseases threaten global food security through crop losses and toxin contamination, exacerbated by fungicide resistance and climate change. Here we demonstrate that magnetite (iron oxide) nanoparticles provide size-dependent protection against Fusarium graminearum in rice through dual antifungal and immunity mechanisms. Using antifungal assays, root iron layer analysis, and pathogen challenges under controlled and soil-based conditions, we evaluated 5 and 10 nanometer magnetite nanoparticles. Results reveal pronounced size-dependent activity, with 5 nanometer particles achieving 67.4% fungal inhibition in vitro versus 44.6% for 10 nanometer particles. In agricultural trials, 5 nanometer nanoparticles at 1.0 milligrams per liter reduced disease area by 82.7%, outperforming 10 nanometer particles (67.5%) and ionic iron (43.8%). The nanoparticles enhanced protective iron layers on roots and activated plant defense, increasing defense hormones 2.8–3.5-fold. Gene expression analysis revealed upregulation of plant immunity and antimicrobial compound pathways. Size-engineered magnetite nanoparticles offer promising sustainable alternatives to conventional fungicides. Custom-designed magnetite nanoparticles effectively reduce fungal growth and stimulate plant defense strategy against Fusarium graminearum in rice through dual antifungal and immunity mechanisms.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five nanometer particles inhibited fungal growth 67.4% in vitro versus 44.6% for ten nanometer particles.

Treatment
5 nanometer particlese0
Interactor
Fusarium graminearumFusarium graminearumt0pathogen
Outcome
fungal inhibitione0
Direction
achievinge0
Value
67.4%e0
Qualifier
44.6%e0
Comparator
10 nanometer particlese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“5 nanometer particles achieving 67.4% fungal inhibition in vitro versus 44.6% for 10 nanometer particles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–667 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice from Fusarium graminearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five nanometer nanoparticles at 1.0 milligrams per liter reduced rice disease area by 82.7%.

Treatment
5 nanometer nanoparticles at 1.0 milligrams per litere0
Interactor
Fusarium graminearumFusarium graminearumt0pathogen
Outcome
disease areae0
Direction
reducede0
Value
82.7%e0
Qualifier
67.5%e0
Comparator
10 nanometer particlese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“5 nanometer nanoparticles at 1.0 milligrams per liter reduced disease area by 82.7%, outperforming 10 nanometer particles (67.5%) and ionic iron (43.8%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–845 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fusarium graminearum via direct antifungal activity and immune activation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–131 · show in text ↑
t1

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ten nanometer nanoparticles reduced rice disease area by 67.5%.

Treatment
10 nanometer particlese0
Interactor
Fusarium graminearumFusarium graminearumt0pathogen
Outcome
disease areat1
Direction
reducedt1
Value
67.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“10 nanometer particles (67.5%) and ionic iron (43.8%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–845 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice from Fusarium graminearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–78 · show in text ↑
t1

“reduced disease area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–767 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ionic iron reduced rice disease area by 43.8%.

Treatment
ionic irone0
Interactor
Fusarium graminearumFusarium graminearumt0pathogen
Outcome
disease areat1
Direction
reducedt1
Value
43.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ionic iron (43.8%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–845 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice from Fusarium graminearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–78 · show in text ↑
t1

“reduced disease area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–767 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanoparticles enhanced protective iron layers on rice roots.

Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
nanoparticlese0
Outcome
protective iron layers on rootse0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The nanoparticles enhanced protective iron layers on roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–905 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanoparticles increased rice defense hormones 2.8–3.5-fold.

Treatment
nanoparticlest1
Outcome
defense hormonese0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
2.8–3.5-folde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“activated plant defense, increasing defense hormones 2.8–3.5-fold”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–975 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–52 · show in text ↑
t1

“The nanoparticles enhanced protective iron layers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–896 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanoparticles upregulated plant immunity and antimicrobial compound pathways.

Treatment
nanoparticlest1
Outcome
plant immunity and antimicrobial compound pathwayse0
Direction
upregulatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gene expression analysis revealed upregulation of plant immunity and antimicrobial compound pathways”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1077 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–52 · show in text ↑
t1

“The nanoparticles enhanced protective iron layers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–896 · show in text ↑

nanoparticle · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

80 papers: 76 positive, 4 negative or no effect

75 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

76 papers more in this group

See all 80 papers →

nanoparticle · physiology: hormones · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

nanoparticle · disease · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

25 papers: 25 positive, 0 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.