Paper · 2025 · Plant Soil and Environment

Genotypic variation in physiological, biochemical, and transcriptional responses to drought stress in spring barley at an early growth stage

Šarlota Kaňuková; Marcela Gubišová; Martina Hudcovicová; et al.

18
claims
45
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Drought is a major abiotic stress limiting barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) productivity. We evaluated 17 spring barley genotypes at the early leaf development stage under controlled laboratory conditions with optimal and drought treatments, integrating physiological, biochemical, and molecular traits. Drought reduced relative water content (–1.3% to –3.2%), plant height (–14.7% to –29.6%), and dry biomass (–2.3% to –24.9%), while inducing strong proline accumulation (+23.6% to +454%) and pigment loss (chlorophyll a –10.1% to –79.5%; carotenoids –6.2% to –70.9%). Principal component and discriminant analyses identified plant height and chlorophyll a as the most reliable discriminators, whereas relative water content was less predictive of the species. Multivariate stratification separated tolerant (Argument, Exalis, Slaven, Malz, Valis), intermediate (Laudis 550, Tango, Kompakt, LG Belcanto, SK Levitus), and sensitive (Kangoo, LG Tosca, LG Flamenco, Karmel, Bojos, Nitran, Tadmor) groups of genotypes. Gene expression profiling of 12 genotypes revealed a modest induction of HvABF2 (1.77-fold), moderate upregulation of HvSOD1 (1.82-fold) and HvAPX1 (2.28-fold), and the strongest response in HvP5CS (3.29-fold), which did not consistently correlate with tolerance. Tolerant genotypes combined growth stability, pigment retention, and moderate osmotic adjustment, whereas sensitive genotypes relied on excessive proline accumulation, resulting in severe pigment and growth penalties. Overall, drought tolerance in barley at the early growth stage emerged from the coordinated regulation of growth, photoprotection, and stress-gene activation, providing a foundation that can guide the selection of genotypes for subsequent validation under field conditions and future breeding programmes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced relative water content by 1.3% to 3.2% in barley.

Taxon
Hordeum vulgareHordeum vulgaree2
Treatment
Droughte0
Outcome
relative water contente0
Direction
reducede0
Value
–1.3% to –3.2%e0
Comparator
optimale1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“limiting barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–83 · show in text ↑
e0

“Drought reduced relative water content (–1.3% to –3.2%), plant height (–14.7% to –29.6%), and dry biomass (–2.3% to –24.9%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 299–422 · show in text ↑
e1

“under controlled laboratory conditions with optimal and drought treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–235 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced plant height by 14.7% to 29.6% in barley.

Taxon
Hordeum vulgareHordeum vulgaree2
Treatment
Droughte0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
reducede0
Value
–14.7% to –29.6%e0
Comparator
optimale1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“limiting barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–83 · show in text ↑
e0

“Drought reduced relative water content (–1.3% to –3.2%), plant height (–14.7% to –29.6%), and dry biomass (–2.3% to –24.9%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 299–422 · show in text ↑
e1

“under controlled laboratory conditions with optimal and drought treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–235 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced dry biomass by 2.3% to 24.9% in barley.

Taxon
Hordeum vulgareHordeum vulgaree2
Treatment
Droughte0
Outcome
dry biomasse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
–2.3% to –24.9%e0
Comparator
optimale1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“limiting barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–83 · show in text ↑
e0

“Drought reduced relative water content (–1.3% to –3.2%), plant height (–14.7% to –29.6%), and dry biomass (–2.3% to –24.9%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 299–422 · show in text ↑
e1

“under controlled laboratory conditions with optimal and drought treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–235 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought strongly increased proline accumulation by 23.6% to 454% in barley.

Taxon
Hordeum vulgareHordeum vulgaree2
Treatment
Droughte4
Outcome
proline accumulatione4
Direction
increaseinferrede4
Value
+23.6% to +454%e4
Comparator
optimale1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“limiting barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–83 · show in text ↑
e4

“Drought reduced relative water content (–1.3% to –3.2%), plant height (–14.7% to –29.6%), and dry biomass (–2.3% to –24.9%), while inducing strong proline accumulation (+23.6% to +454%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 299–484 · show in text ↑
e1

“under controlled laboratory conditions with optimal and drought treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–235 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought decreased chlorophyll a by 10.1% to 79.5% in barley.

Taxon
Hordeum vulgareHordeum vulgaree2
Treatment
Droughte0
Outcome
chlorophyll ae5
Direction
decreaseinferrede5
Value
–10.1% to –79.5%e5
Comparator
optimale1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“limiting barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–83 · show in text ↑
e0

“Drought reduced relative water content (–1.3% to –3.2%), plant height (–14.7% to –29.6%), and dry biomass (–2.3% to –24.9%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 299–422 · show in text ↑
e1

“under controlled laboratory conditions with optimal and drought treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–235 · show in text ↑
e5

“pigment loss (chlorophyll a –10.1% to –79.5%; carotenoids –6.2% to –70.9%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–563 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought decreased carotenoids by 6.2% to 70.9% in barley.

Taxon
Hordeum vulgareHordeum vulgaree2
Treatment
Droughte0
Outcome
carotenoidse5
Direction
decreaseinferrede5
Value
–6.2% to –70.9%e5
Comparator
optimale1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“limiting barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–83 · show in text ↑
e0

“Drought reduced relative water content (–1.3% to –3.2%), plant height (–14.7% to –29.6%), and dry biomass (–2.3% to –24.9%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 299–422 · show in text ↑
e1

“under controlled laboratory conditions with optimal and drought treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–235 · show in text ↑
e5

“pigment loss (chlorophyll a –10.1% to –79.5%; carotenoids –6.2% to –70.9%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–563 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height and chlorophyll a were the most reliable discriminators of barley genotype tolerance.

Taxon
Hordeum vulgareHordeum vulgaree2
Outcome
most reliable discriminatorse6
Qualifier
plant height and chlorophyll ae6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“limiting barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–83 · show in text ↑
e6

“Principal component and discriminant analyses identified plant height and chlorophyll a as the most reliable discriminators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–688 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative water content was less predictive of the species than the other traits.

Taxon
Hordeum vulgareHordeum vulgaree2
Outcome
relative water contente7
Qualifier
less predictivee7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“limiting barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–83 · show in text ↑
e7

“whereas relative water content was less predictive of the species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–755 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Multivariate stratification separated barley genotypes into tolerant, intermediate and sensitive groups.

Taxon
Hordeum vulgareHordeum vulgaree2
Outcome
Multivariate stratificatione3
Qualifier
tolerant (Argument, Exalis, Slaven, Malz, Valis)e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“limiting barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–83 · show in text ↑
e3

“Multivariate stratification separated tolerant (Argument, Exalis, Slaven, Malz, Valis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–843 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HvABF2 gene expression was induced 1.77-fold under drought.

Taxon
Hordeum vulgareHordeum vulgaree2
Gene
HvABF2e3
Outcome
Gene expressione3
Value
1.77-folde3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“limiting barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–83 · show in text ↑
e3

“Gene expression profiling of 12 genotypes revealed a modest induction of HvABF2 (1.77-fold)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1102 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HvSOD1 was moderately upregulated 1.82-fold.

Taxon
Hordeum vulgareHordeum vulgaree2
Gene
HvSOD1e3
Outcome
upregulatione3
Value
1.82-folde3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“limiting barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–83 · show in text ↑
e3

“moderate upregulation of HvSOD1 (1.82-fold)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1147 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HvAPX1 was upregulated 2.28-fold.

Taxon
Hordeum vulgareHordeum vulgaree2
Gene
HvAPX1e3
Outcome
upregulatione3
Value
2.28-folde3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“limiting barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–83 · show in text ↑
e3

“upregulation of HvSOD1 (1.82-fold) and HvAPX1 (2.28-fold)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1170 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HvP5CS had the strongest response (3.29-fold).

Taxon
Hordeum vulgareHordeum vulgaree2
Gene
HvP5CSe3
Outcome
responsee3
Value
3.29-folde3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“limiting barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–83 · show in text ↑
e3

“the strongest response in HvP5CS (3.29-fold)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1220 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HvP5CS induction did not consistently correlate with tolerance.

Taxon
Hordeum vulgareHordeum vulgaree2
Gene
HvP5CSe3
Outcome
tolerancee4
Qualifier
did not consistently correlate with tolerancee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“limiting barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–83 · show in text ↑
e3

“the strongest response in HvP5CS (3.29-fold)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1220 · show in text ↑
e4

“which did not consistently correlate with tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1273 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Sensitive genotypes suffered severe pigment and growth penalties from excessive proline accumulation.

Taxon
Hordeum vulgareHordeum vulgaree2
Outcome
pigment and growth penaltiese3
Qualifier
excessive proline accumulatione3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“limiting barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–83 · show in text ↑
e3

“sensitive genotypes relied on excessive proline accumulation, resulting in severe pigment and growth penalties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1381–1491 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tolerant genotypes combined growth stability, pigment retention and moderate osmotic adjustment.

Taxon
Hordeum vulgareHordeum vulgaree2
Outcome
growth stability, pigment retention, and moderate osmotic adjustmente3
Qualifier
Tolerant genotypese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“limiting barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–83 · show in text ↑
e3

“Tolerant genotypes combined growth stability, pigment retention, and moderate osmotic adjustment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1371 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Drought tolerance in barley at the early growth stage emerged from coordinated regulation of growth, photoprotection and stress-gene activation.

Taxon
Hordeum vulgareHordeum vulgaree2
Outcome
drought tolerancee3
Qualifier
coordinated regulation of growth, photoprotection, and stress-gene activatione3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“limiting barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–83 · show in text ↑
e3

“drought tolerance in barley at the early growth stage emerged from the coordinated regulation of growth, photoprotection, and stress-gene activation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1502–1650 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The early-stage genotype selection can guide validation under field conditions and breeding.

Taxon
Hordeum vulgareHordeum vulgaree2
Outcome
selection of genotypes for subsequent validation under field conditionse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“limiting barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–83 · show in text ↑
e3

“can guide the selection of genotypes for subsequent validation under field conditions and future breeding programmes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1680–1796 · show in text ↑