Abstract
Due to varietal variation in architecture, the conventional inter-row spacing of 75cm is not always applicable to all varieties in sorghum production. Similarly, the blanketfertilizer recommendation assumes equal fertility levels across all soil types, making itunsuitable. Thus, a field experiment was conducted to find the optimum rate of blendedNPS and inter-row spacing for sorghum in Southeast Ethiopia. The experiment consistedof a factorial combination of five NPS levels (0, 50, 100, 150 and 200 kg NPS ha-1) andthree inter-row spacing (55, 65 and 75cm). The treatments replicated thrice withrandomized complete block design. The results showed that NPS fertilizer and inter-rowspacing had significant (P<0.05) effect on various parameters, but their interaction effecthad no significant effect (P>0.05) on all parameters. Increased inter-row spacing and NPSrate prolonged days to flowering and maturity. The increase in the rate of NPS and interrow spacing significantly increased leaf area, leaf area index, panicle weight, and 1000- kernel weight. Similarly, plant height increased with increasing rate of NPS but decreasedwith increasing inter-row spacing. The maximum grain yield (3336.81 kg ha-1) andbiomass weight (7900.01 kg ha-1) were recorded with a rate of 150 kg NPS ha-1, while thelowest grain yield (1730.21 kg ha-1) and biomass (5660.44 kg ha-1) were obtained undernil-treated plots. The highest grain yield (2734.27 kg ha-1) and biomass (7490.12 kg ha-1)were recorded with spacing of 65 cm. The partial budget analysis showed that the highestnet benefit of 85,913 birr ha-1 with maximum marginal rate of return (2534.22%) wasobtained in the treatment that received 150 kg NPS ha-1 with 65 row-spacing. Therefore,150 kg ha-1 blended NPS with 65 cm inter-row spacing is recommended in the study areaand in dry and semi-arid regions with similar agro-ecological conditions
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing row spacing and NPS rate prolonged flowering and maturity time.
Not reportedComparatorSetting
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L) Moench)”
e0“Increased inter-row spacing and NPSrate prolonged days to flowering and maturity.”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing NPS rate and row spacing increased leaf area and leaf area index.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L) Moench)”
e0“The increase in the rate of NPS and interrow spacing significantly increased leaf area, leaf area index, panicle weight, and 1000- kernel weight.”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing NPS rate and row spacing increased panicle and thousand-kernel weight.
- Treatment
- NPS and interrow spacinge0
- Outcome
- panicle weight, and 1000- kernel weighte0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L) Moench)”
e0“The increase in the rate of NPS and interrow spacing significantly increased leaf area, leaf area index, panicle weight, and 1000- kernel weight.”
Claim · model-written summary
Plant height increased as NPS rate increased.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L) Moench)”
e0“plant height increased with increasing rate of NPS but decreasedwith increasing inter-row spacing.”
Claim · model-written summary
Plant height decreased as row spacing increased.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L) Moench)”
e0“plant height increased with increasing rate of NPS but decreasedwith increasing inter-row spacing.”
Claim · model-written summary
The 150 kg NPS rate produced maximum grain yield of 3336.81 kg ha-1.
- Treatment
- 150 kg NPS ha-1e0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 3336.81 kg ha-1e0
- Qualifier
- 1730.21 kg ha-1e0
- Comparator
- nil-treated plotse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L) Moench)”
e0“The maximum grain yield (3336.81 kg ha-1) andbiomass weight (7900.01 kg ha-1) were recorded with a rate of 150 kg NPS ha-1, while thelowest grain yield (1730.21 kg ha-1) and biomass (5660.44 kg ha-1) were obtained undernil-treated plots.”
Claim · model-written summary
The 150 kg NPS rate produced maximum biomass weight of 7900.01 kg ha-1.
- Treatment
- 150 kg NPS ha-1e0
- Outcome
- biomass weighte0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 7900.01 kg ha-1e0
- Qualifier
- 5660.44 kg ha-1e0
- Comparator
- nil-treated plotse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L) Moench)”
e0“The maximum grain yield (3336.81 kg ha-1) andbiomass weight (7900.01 kg ha-1) were recorded with a rate of 150 kg NPS ha-1, while thelowest grain yield (1730.21 kg ha-1) and biomass (5660.44 kg ha-1) were obtained undernil-treated plots.”
Claim · model-written summary
Spacing of 65 cm gave highest grain yield, 2734.27 kg ha-1.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L) Moench)”
e0“The highest grain yield (2734.27 kg ha-1) and biomass (7490.12 kg ha-1)were recorded with spacing of 65 cm.”
Claim · model-written summary
Spacing of 65 cm gave highest biomass, 7490.12 kg ha-1.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L) Moench)”
e0“The highest grain yield (2734.27 kg ha-1) and biomass (7490.12 kg ha-1)were recorded with spacing of 65 cm.”
Claim · model-written summary
The 150 kg NPS and 65 cm spacing treatment gave highest net benefit of 85,913 birr ha-1.
- Treatment
- 150 kg NPS ha-1 with 65 row-spacinge0
- Outcome
- net benefite0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 85,913 birr ha-1e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L) Moench)”
e0“the highestnet benefit of 85,913 birr ha-1 with maximum marginal rate of return (2534.22%) wasobtained in the treatment that received 150 kg NPS ha-1 with 65 row-spacing.”
Claim · model-written summary
The 150 kg NPS and 65 cm spacing treatment gave maximum marginal return of 2534.22%.
- Treatment
- 150 kg NPS ha-1 with 65 row-spacinge0
- Outcome
- marginal rate of returne0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 2534.22%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L) Moench)”
e0“the highestnet benefit of 85,913 birr ha-1 with maximum marginal rate of return (2534.22%) wasobtained in the treatment that received 150 kg NPS ha-1 with 65 row-spacing.”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend 150 kg ha-1 blended NPS with 65 cm spacing in comparable dry and semi-arid regions.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L) Moench)”
e0“150 kg ha-1 blended NPS with 65 cm inter-row spacing is recommended in the study areaand in dry and semi-arid regions with similar agro-ecological conditions”
The same questions in other papers
nanoparticle · growth · SorghumPositive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →nanoparticle · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results
28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
27 papers more in this group
See all 31 papers →density · growth · SorghumPositive and negative results
21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
30 papers more in this group
See all 34 papers →density · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results
82 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
94 papers more in this group
See all 98 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.