Paper · 2025 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Optimizing Inter-row Spacing and Blended NPS Fertilizer to Boost Production of Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L) Moench) and Ensure its Economic Feasibility

Abas, Aden Ahmed; Bayou, Walelign Demisie

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Due to varietal variation in architecture, the conventional inter-row spacing of 75cm is not always applicable to all varieties in sorghum production. Similarly, the blanketfertilizer recommendation assumes equal fertility levels across all soil types, making itunsuitable. Thus, a field experiment was conducted to find the optimum rate of blendedNPS and inter-row spacing for sorghum in Southeast Ethiopia. The experiment consistedof a factorial combination of five NPS levels (0, 50, 100, 150 and 200 kg NPS ha-1) andthree inter-row spacing (55, 65 and 75cm). The treatments replicated thrice withrandomized complete block design. The results showed that NPS fertilizer and inter-rowspacing had significant (P<0.05) effect on various parameters, but their interaction effecthad no significant effect (P>0.05) on all parameters. Increased inter-row spacing and NPSrate prolonged days to flowering and maturity. The increase in the rate of NPS and interrow spacing significantly increased leaf area, leaf area index, panicle weight, and 1000- kernel weight. Similarly, plant height increased with increasing rate of NPS but decreasedwith increasing inter-row spacing. The maximum grain yield (3336.81 kg ha-1) andbiomass weight (7900.01 kg ha-1) were recorded with a rate of 150 kg NPS ha-1, while thelowest grain yield (1730.21 kg ha-1) and biomass (5660.44 kg ha-1) were obtained undernil-treated plots. The highest grain yield (2734.27 kg ha-1) and biomass (7490.12 kg ha-1)were recorded with spacing of 65 cm. The partial budget analysis showed that the highestnet benefit of 85,913 birr ha-1 with maximum marginal rate of return (2534.22%) wasobtained in the treatment that received 150 kg NPS ha-1 with 65 row-spacing. Therefore,150 kg ha-1 blended NPS with 65 cm inter-row spacing is recommended in the study areaand in dry and semi-arid regions with similar agro-ecological conditions

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing row spacing and NPS rate prolonged flowering and maturity time.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
inter-row spacing and NPSratee0
Outcome
days to flowering and maturitye0
Direction
prolongede0

Not reportedComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L) Moench)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–115 · show in text ↑
e0

“Increased inter-row spacing and NPSrate prolonged days to flowering and maturity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–912 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing NPS rate and row spacing increased leaf area and leaf area index.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
NPS and interrow spacinge0
Outcome
leaf area, leaf area indexe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L) Moench)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–115 · show in text ↑
e0

“The increase in the rate of NPS and interrow spacing significantly increased leaf area, leaf area index, panicle weight, and 1000- kernel weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1058 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing NPS rate and row spacing increased panicle and thousand-kernel weight.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
NPS and interrow spacinge0
Outcome
panicle weight, and 1000- kernel weighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L) Moench)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–115 · show in text ↑
e0

“The increase in the rate of NPS and interrow spacing significantly increased leaf area, leaf area index, panicle weight, and 1000- kernel weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1058 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height increased as NPS rate increased.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
NPSe0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L) Moench)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–115 · show in text ↑
e0

“plant height increased with increasing rate of NPS but decreasedwith increasing inter-row spacing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1168 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height decreased as row spacing increased.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
inter-row spacinge0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
decreasedwithe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L) Moench)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–115 · show in text ↑
e0

“plant height increased with increasing rate of NPS but decreasedwith increasing inter-row spacing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1168 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 150 kg NPS rate produced maximum grain yield of 3336.81 kg ha-1.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
150 kg NPS ha-1e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
3336.81 kg ha-1e0
Qualifier
1730.21 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
nil-treated plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L) Moench)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–115 · show in text ↑
e0

“The maximum grain yield (3336.81 kg ha-1) andbiomass weight (7900.01 kg ha-1) were recorded with a rate of 150 kg NPS ha-1, while thelowest grain yield (1730.21 kg ha-1) and biomass (5660.44 kg ha-1) were obtained undernil-treated plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1406 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 150 kg NPS rate produced maximum biomass weight of 7900.01 kg ha-1.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
150 kg NPS ha-1e0
Outcome
biomass weighte0
Direction
maximume0
Value
7900.01 kg ha-1e0
Qualifier
5660.44 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
nil-treated plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L) Moench)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–115 · show in text ↑
e0

“The maximum grain yield (3336.81 kg ha-1) andbiomass weight (7900.01 kg ha-1) were recorded with a rate of 150 kg NPS ha-1, while thelowest grain yield (1730.21 kg ha-1) and biomass (5660.44 kg ha-1) were obtained undernil-treated plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1406 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spacing of 65 cm gave highest grain yield, 2734.27 kg ha-1.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
spacing of 65 cme0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2734.27 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L) Moench)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–115 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest grain yield (2734.27 kg ha-1) and biomass (7490.12 kg ha-1)were recorded with spacing of 65 cm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1407–1514 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spacing of 65 cm gave highest biomass, 7490.12 kg ha-1.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
spacing of 65 cme0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
7490.12 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L) Moench)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–115 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest grain yield (2734.27 kg ha-1) and biomass (7490.12 kg ha-1)were recorded with spacing of 65 cm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1407–1514 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 150 kg NPS and 65 cm spacing treatment gave highest net benefit of 85,913 birr ha-1.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
150 kg NPS ha-1 with 65 row-spacinge0
Outcome
net benefite0
Direction
higheste0
Value
85,913 birr ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L) Moench)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–115 · show in text ↑
e0

“the highestnet benefit of 85,913 birr ha-1 with maximum marginal rate of return (2534.22%) wasobtained in the treatment that received 150 kg NPS ha-1 with 65 row-spacing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1555–1725 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 150 kg NPS and 65 cm spacing treatment gave maximum marginal return of 2534.22%.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
150 kg NPS ha-1 with 65 row-spacinge0
Outcome
marginal rate of returne0
Direction
maximume0
Value
2534.22%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L) Moench)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–115 · show in text ↑
e0

“the highestnet benefit of 85,913 birr ha-1 with maximum marginal rate of return (2534.22%) wasobtained in the treatment that received 150 kg NPS ha-1 with 65 row-spacing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1555–1725 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 150 kg ha-1 blended NPS with 65 cm spacing in comparable dry and semi-arid regions.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
150 kg ha-1 blended NPS with 65 cm inter-row spacinge0
Setting
dry and semi-arid regionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L) Moench)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–115 · show in text ↑
e0

“150 kg ha-1 blended NPS with 65 cm inter-row spacing is recommended in the study areaand in dry and semi-arid regions with similar agro-ecological conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1736–1893 · show in text ↑

nanoparticle · growth · SorghumPositive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

31 papers: 29 positive, 2 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

density · growth · SorghumPositive and negative results

34 papers: 22 positive, 12 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

density · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

98 papers: 83 positive, 15 negative or no effect

82 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

94 papers more in this group

See all 98 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.