Abstract
The present study depicts the effects of different surge flow irrigations on water flow speed and the quality of irrigation under the universal siphon device and explores the feasibility of replacing surge flow irrigation in wheat.Four irrigation treatments were implemented in wheat: surge irrigation group (S), alternating surge irrigation group (AS), fixed surge irrigation group (FS), and continuous irrigation group (C).In each treatment, we measured water flow speed, irrigation uniformity, water use efficiency (WUE) and the yield of wheat.The results revealed that under the universal siphon device, the water flow speed of surge flow irrigation was faster than that of continuous irrigation.Among the four kinds of irrigation, surge irrigation was more effective in enhancing irrigation uniformity.The irrigation uniformity of S treatment and AS treatment was 3.01% and 2.04% higher than C treatment, respectively.And AS treatment has better effect to increase the yield of winter wheat compared with the S and FS treatment.AS treatment has a better potential to improve water use efficiency, followed by FS treatment.They were 94.74 and 73.68% higher than C, respectively.Therefore, the use of alternating surge irrigation for winter wheat in Tai'an, can achieve significant water saving and yield-increasing effects.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Surge irrigation water flowed faster than continuous irrigation under the siphon device.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- surge flow irrigatione0
- Outcome
- water flow speede0
- Direction
- fastere0
- Comparator
- continuous irrigatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wheat”
e0“under the universal siphon device, the water flow speed of surge flow irrigation was faster than that of continuous irrigation”
Claim · model-written summary
Surge irrigation improved irrigation uniformity relative to other treatments.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- surge irrigatione0
- Outcome
- irrigation uniformitye0
- Direction
- enhancinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wheat”
e0“surge irrigation was more effective in enhancing irrigation uniformity”
Claim · model-written summary
S treatment improved irrigation uniformity 3.01% over C.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- S treatmente0
- Outcome
- irrigation uniformitye0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 3.01%e0
- Comparator
- C treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wheat”
e0“The irrigation uniformity of S treatment and AS treatment was 3.01% and 2.04% higher than C treatment, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
AS treatment improved irrigation uniformity 2.04% over C.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- AS treatmente0
- Outcome
- irrigation uniformitye0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 2.04%e0
- Comparator
- C treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wheat”
e0“The irrigation uniformity of S treatment and AS treatment was 3.01% and 2.04% higher than C treatment, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
AS treatment increased winter wheat yield compared with S and FS.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- AS treatmente0
- Outcome
- yield of winter wheate0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Comparator
- S and FS treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“AS treatment has better effect to increase the yield of winter wheat compared with the S and FS treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
AS treatment improved water use efficiency 94.74% over C.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- AS treatmente0
- Outcome
- water use efficiencye0
- Direction
- improvee0
- Value
- 94.74e0
- Comparator
- Ce0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wheat”
e0“AS treatment has a better potential to improve water use efficiency, followed by FS treatment.They were 94.74 and 73.68% higher than C, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
FS treatment improved water use efficiency 73.68% over C.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- FS treatmente0
- Outcome
- water use efficiencye0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 73.68%e0
- Comparator
- Ce0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wheat”
e0“AS treatment has a better potential to improve water use efficiency, followed by FS treatment.They were 94.74 and 73.68% higher than C, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend alternating surge irrigation for winter wheat in Tai’an to save water and raise yield.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Outcome
- use of alternating surge irrigatione0
- Setting
- Tai'ane0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the use of alternating surge irrigation for winter wheat in Tai'an, can achieve significant water saving and yield-increasing effects”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
252 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
299 papers more in this group
See all 303 papers →irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
985 papers more in this group
See all 989 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.